Proactive Inhibition

2021 ◽  
pp. 3676-3676
Keyword(s):  
Proactive Inhibition

Proactive inhibition in short-term memory as a function of grammatical class

1964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delos D. Wickens ◽  
Roy D. Wittlinger ◽  
Frances A. Hill
Keyword(s):  
Short Term Memory ◽  
Proactive Inhibition ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Term Memory ◽  
Grammatical Class

Proactive Inhibition as a Function of Prior Learning in the Absence of List Differentiation

1969 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Cook ◽  
Richard C. Atkinson ◽  
Thomas D. Wickens
Keyword(s):  
Proactive Inhibition ◽  
Prior Learning

Proactive inhibition in free recall.

1970 ◽  
Vol 83 (3, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 495-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Shuell ◽  
Roger Koehler
Keyword(s):  
Free Recall ◽  
Proactive Inhibition

scholarly journals Preparing to React: A Behavioral Study on the Interplay between Proactive and Reactive Action Inhibition

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 680
Author(s):  
Stefania C. Ficarella ◽  
Andrea Desantis ◽  
Alexandre Zénon ◽  
Boris Burle
Keyword(s):  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Motor Preparation ◽  
Proactive Inhibition ◽  
False Alarms ◽  
Control Mechanisms ◽  
Reactive Inhibition ◽  
Inhibitory Mechanisms ◽  
Motor Activities ◽  
Errors Analysis ◽  
Action Inhibition

Motor preparation, based on one’s goals and expectations, allows for prompt reactions to stimulations from the environment. Proactive and reactive inhibitory mechanisms modulate this preparation and interact to allow a flexible control of responses. In this study, we investigate these two control mechanisms with an ad hoc cued Go/NoGo Simon paradigm in a within-subjects design, and by measuring subliminal motor activities through electromyographic recordings. Go cues instructed participants to prepare a response and wait for target onset to execute it (Go target) or inhibit it (NoGo target). Proactive inhibition keeps the prepared response in check, hence preventing false alarms. Preparing the cue-coherent effector in advance speeded up responses, even when it turned out to be the incorrect effector and reactive inhibition was needed to perform the action with the contralateral one. These results suggest that informative cues allow for the investigation of the interaction between proactive and reactive action inhibition. Partial errors’ analysis suggests that their appearance in compatible conflict-free trials depends on cue type and prior preparatory motor activity. Motor preparation plays a key role in determining whether proactive inhibition is needed to flexibly control behavior, and it should be considered when investigating proactive/reactive inhibition.

Children's Encoding of the Sense Impressions Evoked by Words

1976 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 963-966
Author(s):  
Robert V. Kail ◽  
Robert H. Jongeward ◽  
Barbara L. Daoust ◽  
Deborah L. Aaron
Keyword(s):  
Proactive Inhibition ◽  
Do So

Recall by 128 8- and 10-yr.-old children was tested on a release from proactive inhibition task. Each of five trials consisted of presentation of two words to be remembered, a distracting task, and an interval for recall. Words on Trials 1 to 4 were selected from one of two categories of sense impression: round, e.g., head, balloon, or white, e.g., snow, napkin. Words on Trial 5 were selected from the alternate category. In one condition the name of the sense-impression category was given immediately prior to the presentation of words to be remembered. In a second condition the category name was not provided. Recall on Trial 5 increased only for children who received the category cue. Thus, while children may not spontaneously encode the sense impressions evoked by words, they can be induced to do so.

scholarly journals Proactive inhibition: An element of inhibitory control in eating disorders

2016 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Savani Bartholdy ◽  
Iain C. Campbell ◽  
Ulrike Schmidt ◽  
Owen G. O’Daly
Keyword(s):  
Eating Disorders ◽  
Inhibitory Control ◽  
Proactive Inhibition

The role of response similarity in proactive inhibition.

1962 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 364-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kent M. Dallett
Keyword(s):  
Proactive Inhibition

Associative Inhibition: An Encoding Task Measuring Associative Interference (Proactive Type) during Learning

1974 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 863-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold J. Margolis
Keyword(s):  
School District ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Paired Associate ◽  
Proactive Inhibition ◽  
Psychological Services ◽  
Associative Interference ◽  
Inhibitory Processes ◽  
Special Cases ◽  
Paper And Pencil ◽  
Midwestern City

Two forms of a novel paper-and-pencil encoding task were developed to measure proactive inhibition during learning when given to children and adolescents. The 2 forms of the encoding task were administered individually to 63 students referred for psychological services throughout a school district from a midwestern city. Results indicated that proactive inhibitory processes were present throughout learning and suggested that this encoding task could substitute, in special cases, for the classical verbal presentation of paired-associate materials that typically require individual administration.

Proactive Inhibition as a Result of Activation

1984 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umur Talasli
Keyword(s):  
Memory Trace ◽  
Proactive Inhibition ◽  
Long Term Memory ◽  
Term Memory ◽  
Initial Recall ◽  
Significant Attenuation ◽  
Presence And Absence

A novel encoding hypothesis that explains proactive inhibition in the Brown-Peterson paradigm was developed and tested in three experiments. This hypothesis argues that initial recall on each trial activates a pool of associates and the encoding of the next trial occurs during such activation. The encoding is facilitated and leaves a weak long-term memory trace. Build-up and release of inhibition, as well as a number of other typical results, are parsimoniously accounted for by such a mechanism. In support of the hypothesis, Exps. 1 and 2 demonstrated significant accentuation of proactive inhibition with increased activation both in the presence and absence of inter-trial category relationship. Exp. 3 showed significant attenuation of proactive inhibition as activation decayed. Increase in latency of recall with increased activation was also noted.

scholarly journals Early changes in corticomotor excitability underlie proactive inhibitory control of error correction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Borja Rodriguez Herreros ◽  
Julia L Amengual ◽  
Jimena Lucrecia Vazquez-Anguiano ◽  
Silvio Ionta ◽  
Carlo Miniussi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inhibitory Control ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Decisive Role ◽  
Neural Correlates ◽  
Proactive Inhibition ◽  
Conclusive Evidence ◽  
Inhibitory Mechanism ◽  
Neural Basis ◽  
Corticomotor Excitability ◽  
Control Of Error

Converging evidence indicates that response inhibition may arise from the interaction of effortful proactive and reflexive reactive mechanisms. However, the distinction between the neural basis sustaining proactive and reactive inhibitory processes is still unclear. To identify reliable neural markers of proactive inhibition, we examined the behavioral and electrophysiological correlates elicited by manipulating the degree of inhibitory control in a task that involved the detection and amendment of errors. Restraining or encouraging the correction of errors did not affect the time course of the behavioral and neural correlates associated to reactive inhibition. We rather found that a bilateral and sustained decrease of corticomotor excitability was required for an effective proactive inhibitory control, whereas selective strategies were associated with defective response suppression. Our results provide behavioral and electrophysiological conclusive evidence of a comprehensive proactive inhibitory mechanism, with a distinctive underlying neural basis, governing the commission and amendment of errors. Together, these findings hint at a decisive role for changes in corticomotor excitability in determining whether an action will be successfully suppressed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document