Innovation Concept: High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation saves lives; however, current certification standards can leave providers poorly prepared to perform effective chest compressions (CCs). We designed a training program based on the emerging model of skill maintenance through frequent short practice sessions. The ideal frequency of training is currently unknown. Our goal was to provide medical students with access to efficient and effective CC training and to determine an optimal training interval. Methods: Thirty-six second-year medical students were randomized to three groups that trained at different frequencies: once every two months (q2m) (n = 12), once every four months (q4m) (n = 13), and control (n = 11). Study duration was eight months with the intervention groups, q2m and q4m, participating in five and three sessions respectively. The control group was assessed at study start and end, receiving no training in between. At each session, participants completed a one-minute pre-test of CC performance, viewed a one-minute training video, practiced CCs for two minutes with real-time feedback, and completed a one-minute post-test. Performance parameters measured were CC depth, rate, release, and hand positioning. A final “compression score” assessed integrated performance across these parameters and served as our primary outcome. Participants also reported pre- and post-training comfort with performing CCs which served as our secondary outcome. Curriculum, Tool or Material: Our “Quick Refresher Sessions” (QRS) were completed by participants independently without requiring an assessor or facilitator. A manikin with the ability to record and provide real-time quantitative feedback on CC quality was connected to a laptop running a customized interface. Participants typed in an individualized code and were guided through their six-minute sessions automatically. Conclusion: Immediately following the first training session, subjects had significant improvement in compression score (p < 0.001) and skill comfort (p < 0.001). At eight months, both intervention groups, q2m and q4m, achieved higher compression scores than control (p = 0.001 and p = 0.011) and showed greater increase in comfort level (p = 0.002 and p = 0.010). Performance between intervention groups at eight months was not statistically different. Overall, we conclude that independent QRS training every two or four months led to improved CC quality and provider comfort. Future directions include increasing sample size and tailoring training intervals to individual performance.
Man versus Machine: the importance of manual blood pressure measurement skills amongst registered nurses
