EEE Catalogue: A Global Database of Earthquake Environmental Effects

2015 ◽  
pp. 932-944
Author(s):  
Luca Guerrieri ◽  
Alessandro Maria Michetti ◽  
Pablo G. Silva
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Effects ◽  
Global Database ◽  
Earthquake Environmental Effects

scholarly journals New Perspectives in the Definition/Evaluation of Seismic Hazard through Analysis of the Environmental Effects Induced by Earthquakes

Geosciences ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabina Porfido ◽  
Giuliana Alessio ◽  
Germana Gaudiosi ◽  
Rosa Nappi
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Environmental Effects ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Seismic Intensity ◽  
Seismic Hazards ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Strong Earthquakes ◽  
Innovative Methods ◽  
Esi Scale ◽  
Earthquake Environmental Effects

The application of the Environmental Seismic Intensity (ESI) scale 2007 to moderate and strong earthquakes, in different geological context all over the word, highlights the importance of Earthquake Environmental Effects (EEEs) for the assessment of seismic hazards. This Special Issue “New Perspectives in the Definition/Evaluation of Seismic Hazard through Analysis of the Environmental Effects Induced by Earthquakes” presents a collection of scientific contributions that provide a sample of the state-of-the-art in this field. Moreover the collected papers also analyze new data produced with multi-disciplinary and innovative methods essential for development of new seismic hazard models.

scholarly journals Deformation pattern of the 6 and 7 April 2009, <i>M</i><sub>W</sub>=6.3 and <i>M</i><sub>W</sub>=5.6 earthquakes in L'Aquila (Central Italy) revealed by ground and space based observations

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. D. Papanikolaou ◽  
M. Foumelis ◽  
I. Parcharidis ◽  
E. L. Lekkas ◽  
I. G. Fountoulis
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Effects ◽  
Central Italy ◽  
Deformation Pattern ◽  
Fault Surface ◽  
The Past ◽  
Order Of Magnitude ◽  
Surface Ruptures ◽  
Maximum Subsidence ◽  
Fault Trace ◽  
Earthquake Environmental Effects

Abstract. The deformation pattern of the 6 and 7 April 2009 MW=6.3 and MW=5.6 earthquakes in L'Aquila is revealed by DInSAR analysis and compared with earthquake environmental effects. The DInSAR predicted fault surface ruptures coincide with localities where surface ruptures have been observed in the field, confirming that the ruptures observed near Paganica village are indeed primary. These ruptures are almost one order of magnitude lower than the ruptures that have been produced by other major surrounding faults in the past. These faults have not been activated during the 2009 event, but have the capacity to generate significantly stronger events. DInSAR analysis shows that 66% (or 305 km2) of the area deformed has been subsided whereas the remaining 34% (or 155 km2) has been uplifted. A footwall uplift versus hangingwall subsidence ratio of about 1/3 is extracted from the mainshock. The maximum subsidence (25 cm) was recorded about 4.5 km away from the primary surface ruptures and about 9 km away from the epicentre. In the immediate hangingwall, subsidence did not exceeded 15 cm, showing that the maximum subsidence is not recorded near the ruptured fault trace, but closer to the hangingwall centre. The deformation pattern is asymmetrical expanding significantly towards the southeast. A part of this asymmetry can be attributed to the contribution of the 7 April event in the deformation field.

scholarly journals The August 24th 2016 Accumoli earthquake: surface faulting and Deep-Seated Gravitational Slope Deformation (DSGSD) in the Monte Vettore area

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico Aringoli ◽  
Piero Farabollini ◽  
Marco Giacopetti ◽  
Marco Materazzi ◽  
Silvia Paggi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Effects ◽  
Active Fault ◽  
Central Italy ◽  
Slope Deformation ◽  
Geological Survey ◽  
Western Slope ◽  
Secondary Effects ◽  
The Village ◽  
Earthquake Environmental Effects

<p>On August 24th 2016 a Mw=6.0 earthquake hit central Italy, with the epicenter located at the boundaries between Lazio, Marche, Abruzzi and Umbria regions, near the village of Accumoli (Rieti, Lazio). Immediately after the mainshock, this geological survey has been focused on the earthquake environmental effects related to the tectonic reactivation of the previously mapped active fault (i.e. primary), as well as secondary effects mostly related to the seismic shaking (e.g. landslides and fracturing in soil and rock).This paper brings data on superficial effects and some preliminary considerations about the interaction and possible relationship between surface faulting and the occurrence of Deep-Seated Gravitational Slope Deformation (DSGSD) along the southern and western slope of Monte Vettore.</p>

scholarly journals Assessing the Reliability of Earthquake Environmental Effects in Historical Events: Insights from the Southern Apennines, Italy

Geosciences ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Francesca Ferrario ◽  
Leonello Serva ◽  
Livio Bonadeo
Keyword(s):  
Hazard Assessment ◽  
Environmental Effects ◽  
Near Field ◽  
Seismic Hazard Assessment ◽  
Seismic Events ◽  
Southern Apennines ◽  
Intensity Attenuation ◽  
Literary Sources ◽  
Earthquake Effects ◽  
Earthquake Environmental Effects

Earthquake Environmental Effects (EEEs) are a common occurrence following moderate to strong seismic events. EEEs are described in literary sources even for earthquakes that occurred hundreds of years ago, but their potential for hazard assessment is not fully exploited. Here we analyze five earthquakes occurred in the Southern Apennines (Italy) between 1688 and 1980, to assess if EEEs are reliable indicators of the effects caused by past earthquakes. We investigate the spatial distribution of EEEs and their ability to repeatedly occur at the same place, and we quantitatively compare the macroseismic fields expressed in terms of damage-based intensity (MCS: Mercalli–Cancani–Sieberg) to the Environmental Scale Intensity (ESI) macroseismic field, derived from an intensity attenuation relation. We computed the field “ESI-MCS”, showing that results are consistent when comparing different seismic events and that ESI values are higher in the first ca. 10 km from the epicenter, while at distances greater than 20 km MCS values are higher than ESI. Our research demonstrates that (i) EEEs offer a detailed picture of earthquake effects in the near field and (ii) the reappraisal of literary sources under a modern perspective may provide improved input parameters that are useful for seismic hazard assessment.

scholarly journals SPATIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES TO EARTHQUAKE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS (EEES)

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 511
Author(s):  
D. Minos-Minopoulos ◽  
D. Dominey-Howes ◽  
K. Pavlopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Environmental Effects ◽  
Vulnerability Assessment ◽  
Environmental Effect ◽  
Earthquake Hazard ◽  
Regional Level ◽  
Archaeological Sites ◽  
Heritage Protection ◽  
Earthquake Environmental Effects ◽  
Ground Liquefaction

The study examines a semi-quantitative indicator based method to assess the spatial susceptibility of archaeological sites to the secondary Earthquake Environmental Effects (EEEs) of ground liquefaction, landslides and tsunami. The method was applied at 16 archaeological sites allowing the identification of the EEEs each site is susceptible to and their prioritization at a national and regional level through the Spatial Susceptibility index (SSi). Results indicate that the majority of the sites are susceptible to at least one Earthquake Environmental Effect. This highlights their contribution to the vulnerability of archaeological sitesto earthquake hazard and the necessity for the integration of spatial susceptibility parameters in vulnerability assessment studies for cultural heritage protection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document