The U.S. Trade Deficit with China: An Excuse

Author(s):  
Tao Yuan
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 80-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kan Yue ◽  
Kevin Honglin Zhang
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler T. Yu ◽  
Miranda M. Zhang

<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 37.8pt 0pt 0.5in; mso-pagination: none;"><span style="font-family: &quot;CG Times&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-bidi-font-style: italic;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">This paper discusses the per-capita consumption of imports aspect of international trade.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>A research hypothesis is tested to investigate if there is a significant difference among G-7 countries in per-capita consumption of imports and the implication of the testing results for the U.S. - Japan bilateral trade deficit.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>The results of the ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test yield insignificant variation in per-capita consumption of imported goods/services among the G-7 countries.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>The study recapitulates the reason(s) for the U.S. trade deficit with Japan and essentially states that factors other than trade barriers and restrictions cause the U.S. trade deficit with Japan.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>While this result may initially seem counterintuitive and inconsistent with popular wisdom, it may actually help uncover the true causes for the sustained trade deficit with Japan.</span></span></p>


2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myeong Hwan Kim
Keyword(s):  

1987 ◽  
Vol 1987 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul R. Krugman ◽  
Richard E. Baldwin ◽  
Barry Bosworth ◽  
Peter Hooper
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Quinlan ◽  
Marc Chandler
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Jui-Lung Chen

When US President Donald Trump signed the Section 301 Investigation in March 2018, the Sino-US trade war intensified, exerting a great impact on the global economy. The Trump Administration recently has piled up the economic and trade pressure on China, while China seeks to resort to the WTO dispute settlement mechanism and break the siege imposed by the trade war through the &quot;Belt and Road Initiative&quot;. US launched a trade war against China due mainly to the huge trade deficit with China, and the trade frictions between the U.S. and China have caused turbulence on the Asian and global industrial chains. Therefore, by analyzing the recent trade conflicts between the U.S. and China and the responses given by both respectively, this paper explores the possible impact on Taiwan&#39;s manufacturing and its potential response.


1970 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Granger Macy ◽  
Bruce Barringer ◽  
Max Wortman

The remarkable pace of change in world markets has caused a fundamental shiftin the number of possible avenues of growth for U.S. exporters. Eastern Bloc countriesand the republics of the former Soviet Union are actively soliciting trade. Asianeconomies are experiencing growth at an unprecedented rate. The approaching unificationof the European Community and the possibility of a ratified North AmericanFree Trade agreement may provide additional opportunities for well-positioned U.S.firms.For many U.S. companies, exports represent a small but still vital portion of theiroverall sales. Exports can also decrease the trade deficit and reduce unemployment.Depending on the source, it has been estimated that each additional billion dollars worthof exports creates between 19,600 and 30,000 new jobs. The Commerce Department,the Department of Labor, and the U.S. ExportJImport Bank have made estimates withinthis range. A deeper understanding of how firms reach their full export potential isimportant for American businesses and the nation as a whole.


1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Pakko
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document