Subjective Health Status Components in a General Population Survey

Author(s):  
P. Potthoff
2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 831-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryuji Furihata ◽  
Makoto Uchiyama ◽  
Sakae Takahashi ◽  
Masahiro Suzuki ◽  
Chisato Konno ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 163 (3) ◽  
pp. 453-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Nermoen ◽  
Eystein S Husebye ◽  
Johan Svartberg ◽  
Kristian Løvås

BackgroundPatients with classical congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) require life-long corticosteroid therapy, with uncertain health outcome. Investigations of subjective health status in unselected populations of adult patients are needed.ObjectiveTo identify all adult Norwegian patients with CAH and obtain population-based data on subjective and psychological health status, working ability and fertility.Patients, methods and designClassical CAH patients were identified through search in electronic diagnosis registries at all the university hospitals in Norway. The diagnosis was verified by scrutiny of medical records. The patients were invited to a questionnaire survey including medical history, and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Quality of Life Scale questionnaires. The questionnaire responses and fertility data were compared with normative data.ResultsWe identified 104 adult patients (101 alive) with classical CAH (63% female), yielding overall incidence at 1/20 000 live births (1/16 000 in females). Seventy-two (72%) responded; median age 38 years (range 18–72). All the SF-36 scales were significantly impaired, most pronounced for general health and vitality perception. Working disability was reported by 19% of the patients, compared with 10% in the general population. The female patients were often single, and the CAH women had only 21% of the expected number of children compared with the general population.ConclusionIn this population-based survey of patients with classical CAH, we found that subjective health status and working ability were impaired, and that fertility was reduced in females. There is a need for improvement of the medical treatment and the general care of this patient group.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 495-500
Author(s):  
Younpyo Lee ◽  
Su-keun Park ◽  
Jae-ho Khil ◽  
Sungho Maeng ◽  
Jungwon Shin ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-52
Author(s):  
Katalin Nagyváradi ◽  
Zsuzsa Mátrai

AbstractSeveral research works in the related international literature on sociology and health sciences deal with the state of health in one selected population. In these studies, the chosen sample is often connected with special jobs, especially with healthcare professionals and their working conditions. These studies predominantly examine the self-rated subjective health status using questionnaires. There are others that assess the state of health based not only on self-rated subjective indicators, but also using objective data gained by measuring. Considering the international experiences, we chose a special population in our research – healthcare professionals working in an institute for chronically ill psychiatric patients. Our choice was influenced by the fact that we wanted to include their unique working conditions when exploring and assessing their health status. Moreover, our approach was to assess the objective state of health alongside the subjective factors, as our hypothesis was that the majority of the indicators presumably coincided. The data were collected with the help of three questionnaires and some indicators of the objective health statuses were measured. The findings were processed using the SPSS 17.0 mathematical-statistical software package. Following the descriptive statistics, we applied hierarchic cluster-analysis based on results of the WHOQOLD-BREF26 life-quality questionnaire, the WHO WBI-5 Well Being Index, and on the body composition analysis. The results show the objective and subjective health status of population and the factors that influenced it; the working conditions and the interpersonal contacts in the workplace. The conclusion was that in the examined population the subjective and objective health status doesn’t coincide.


2021 ◽  
pp. 004728752098891
Author(s):  
Kreg Lindberg ◽  
Ian E. Munanura ◽  
Chad Kooistra ◽  
Mark D. Needham ◽  
Ladan Ghahramani

Research regarding tourism’s effect on the subjective well-being (SWB) of destination residents has provided important insight, but it generally has relied on indirect analyses and diverse measures. This study used livability theory and a novel contingent SWB method in which respondents directly reported anticipated SWB effects. This method is exploratory, but it provides greater confidence in causal relationships. Results from a general population survey in Oregon (USA) suggested the method functioned as intended. County-level population growth and visitor intensity predicted perceived current impacts of tourism. In turn, perceived impacts predicted change in SWB contingent on a vignette reflecting a 20% increase in tourists. Across all individuals and counties, average SWB changes were negative for the environment domain and positive for other domains. Practical implications are discussed, with the most positive SWB effects from tourism development expected to occur in counties with low visitor intensity, especially those with low population growth.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document