The Permanent Establishment The Crisis of an Institution in The Digital Economy

Author(s):  
Hermosin Alvarez Montserrat
Scientax ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Galih Ardin

Tax on digital economy activities has become a widely discussed issue in the world because of the limitation on the permanent establishment concept in anticipating the digital economy's externalities. The failure of OECD countries to reach digital economic taxation agreements also caused these countries to take unilateral measures in securing their respective interests. Indonesia, as a country with considerable digital economy value in the Southeast Asia region, plans to implement the significant economic presence concept to secure its tax revenue that cannot be captured by PE concept in the digital cross-border transaction. However, the implementation of this new nexus could generate new challenges in the Indonesia taxation system. This study seeks to provide alternatives to the Indonesian government regarding the taxable presence and taxation methods on the digital economy, especially digital advertising, by conducting examination and evaluation through current nexuses, the international proposals, and other countries' experience in addressing tax challenges in the digital advertising.


2021 ◽  
Vol 180 (3) ◽  
pp. 97-131
Author(s):  
Montserrat Hermosín Álvarez

The rise of the digital economy, breaking with business models that require a physical presence to develop their activities, has dislodged the traditional concept of permanent establishment set out in Article 5 OECD MC. In the light of the precept’s loopholes, large multinationals have engaged in abusive practices to relocate their profits, thus avoiding contributing in the States where the income is generated in accordance with their economic capacity. In this paper, we examine the concept of permanent establishment included in art. 5 OECD MC, its typology following the BEPS Project’s modifications and the different scenarios that do not constitute a permanent establishment. We also explore whether its legal regime continues to be useful in today’s context or whether, on the contrary, the moment has come to abandon the concept of permanent establishment entirely due to the problems generated by today’s article 5 OECD MC, unable to respond to the challenges posed by the digital economy.


Author(s):  
Karina A. Ponomareva

The purpose of the article is to identify the key features of the proposals to modify the concept of permanent establishment in digital economy, as well as their differences from the traditional concept of permanent establishment. The subject of the study is a comparative analysis of the concepts of digital presence, aimed at finding new factors for the distribution of tax revenues between the states in which digital enterprises operate. The development of the digital economy necessitates the revision of traditional approaches to the taxation of permanent establishment in the doctrine of tax law and in tax legislation. The article considers doctrinal approaches to the concept of permanent establishment in the digital economy, as well as the proposals of the OECD and the European Commission. The core of the debate is the question of whether the classical concept of permanent establishment remains a basis for source taxation for multinational digital enterprises. A comparative analysis of international and European practice shows that the concept of permanent establishment is based on the minimum level of presence of a non-resident in the country required for taxation. This is due to the fact that the main feature of the functioning of digital enterprises, important for tax law, is the absence of the need for their physical presence in the state


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document