Governance Tools

2011 ◽  
pp. 341-363
Author(s):  
Lorraine Murphy ◽  
Frits Meijer ◽  
Henk Visscher
Keyword(s):  
Governance Tools

Of numbers, narratives and challenges: Data as evidence in 21st century policy-making

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 1043-1055
Author(s):  
Gaby Umbach
Keyword(s):  
21St Century ◽  
Policy Making ◽  
Evidence Use ◽  
The Third ◽  
Use Of Data ◽  
Science Advice ◽  
Governance Tools ◽  
The Impact

This article1 offers reflections on the use of data as evidence in 21st century policy-making. It discusses the concept of evidence-informed policy-making (EIPM) as well as the governance and knowledge effects of data as evidence. With this focus, it interlinks the analysis of statistics and politics. The paper first introduces the concept of EIPM and the impact of evidence use. Here it focusses on science and knowledge as resources in policy-making, on the institutionalisation of science advice and on the translation of information and knowledge into evidence. The second part of the article reflects on data as evidence. This part concentrates on abstract and concrete functions of data as governance tools in policy-making, on data as a robust form of evidence and on the effects of data on knowledge and governance. The third part highlights challenges for data as evidence in policy-making, among them, politicisation, transparency, and diversity as well as objectivity and contestation. Finally, the last part draws conclusions on the production and use of data as evidence in EIPM. Throughout the second part of the reflections, reference is made to Walter Radermacher’s 2019 matrix of actors and activities related to data, facts, and policy published in this journal.

scholarly journals Resilience, Reinvention and Transition during and after Quarantine

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-236
Author(s):  
Kristof Van Assche ◽  
Martijn Duineveld ◽  
S. Jeff Birchall ◽  
Leith Deacon ◽  
Raoul Beunen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Current System ◽  
New Governance ◽  
Governance System ◽  
Current Crisis ◽  
Economic Relations ◽  
Systemic Risks ◽  
The Social ◽  
Problems And Solutions ◽  
Governance Tools

Quarantine measures and the crises triggering them are never neutral in the sense that a return to the past is impossible. These measures are also a signal of other things like systemic risks and weaknesses. A period of quarantine is also a thing in and by itself. What happens after quarantine is thus shaped both by the state of the social-ecological system preceding quarantine and by what happened during quarantine. The selectivities introduced during quarantine span discursive, institutional and material realms. Old discourses can return with a new meaning. Social and economic relations can reappear seemingly unchanged, they can be more visibly altered and they can be dismantled. Ideologies, however, to be understood here as master discourses, read problems and solutions in their own way and do not necessarily come closer to each other or disappear. All this, offers food for thought regarding the possibilities and limits of resilience and transition. We argue that the current COVID- 19 pandemic casts doubt on the generic applicability of theories of resilience and transition, yet also sheds a new light on the value of both. We propose the concept of reinvention to describe what is happening and what could happen in a more coordinated fashion. We argue that the current crisis reveals mechanisms in systems dynamics that point at the existence of multiple pathways after dramatic system shocks. Some shocks and their system- specific responses (such as a particular kind of quarantine) are more amenable to resilience strategies afterwards, while others require a path of radical transition. They might also both be needed: a rather stark transition now might ensure future resilience. While the outline of the system after transition is not clear, some desirable features are clear as are the risks and damages of the current system. Also clear is the argument for transitional governance, a temporary governance system (beyond quarantine) which can enable the construction of new long term perspectives in governance and new governance tools meant to reduce chances of a crisis like this one reoccuring.

scholarly journals PROJECT MANAGEMENT COMPETENCE DEVELOPMENT IN APPLICANTS FOR PHD PROGRAMS

2021 ◽  
pp. 288-299
Author(s):  
Iryna Albul
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Civil Society ◽  
Social Work ◽  
Project Management ◽  
Public Space ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Normative Documents ◽  
Project Activity ◽  
Governance Tools ◽  
Information Work

The article is devoted to the issues of applicants’ preparation for higher education at the third educational and scientific level of higher education, speciality 231 Social work.  In the research, based on normative documents, the necessity of project activity competencies development of future applicants of educational and scientific programs has been substantiated. It has been proved the importance of development in the new generation of future managers knowledge and skills to use a modern project approach to solving problems of management processes at different levels. Mastering project management methodology is a new progressive toolkit for social work management as a probable field of activity of PhD graduates in 231 Social Work. Possibilities of information work in project activity are opened, in particular search of information on grant offers, competitions of perspective projects and archival data on already realized. The Group Resource Center was presented as a leading national centre of public information and expertise, which is aimed at the development of civil society and the development of Ukraine. As well as the Public Space portal, which offers unique and up-to-date information on the development of civil society in Ukraine, provides an opportunity to be involved in public activities and important transformations in the country.  The article highlights and substantiates the feasibility of certain theoretical and practical recommendations for the formation of project skills of the future Doctor of Philosophy in social work, including achieving a level of unconscious competence in the development of project proposals, use of democratic governance tools in project activities, effective search, analysis and use of grant information, proposals, mastering the strategy and tactics of team project activities.

scholarly journals Policy capacity and governance conditions for implementing sustainable development goals in Brazil

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (b) ◽  
pp. 38-77
Author(s):  
Natália Massaco Koga ◽  
Fernando Filgueiras ◽  
Maricilene Isaira Baia do Nascimento ◽  
Natasha Borali ◽  
Victor Bastos
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Sustainable Development Goals ◽  
Institutional Design ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Vertical Coordination ◽  
State And Society ◽  
Governance Tools ◽  
Implementation Context ◽  
Development Goals ◽  
Key Aspects

This article examines governance conditions for implementing the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Brazil. The SDGs are a commitment (signed and adopted in September 2015 by 193 countries) to achieve 17 key milestones by 2030 for formulating and implementing public policies that promote economic, social, and environmental development. Yet the Goals’ multifaceted and imbricated nature poses expressive challenges. One argues that the SDGs provide a rich set of interconnected policies to address key aspects of the governance debate, such as the capacities in a complex policy-implementation context; the association between administrative and relational policy capacities; and the dynamics of governance tools. This investigation entails quanti-qualitative analysis based on data produced by semi-structured interviews and a survey with a random sample of the Brazilian federal bureaucracy, answered by 2,000 individuals. The main findings are that the SDGs require a governance strategy capable of building capacity for promoting collaboration among state and society, horizontal and vertical coordination, and data and information for developing analytical capabilities. In sum, SDGs require higher levels of capacities, leadership, and proper institutional design to reach the necessary levels of collaboration for producing coherent and integrated policies, so leadership materializes as the main critical condition for SDGs’ implementation in Brazil.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document