Stand Productivity

Author(s):  
P. W. Rundel ◽  
M. C. Rutherford
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef Hakl ◽  
Martin Pisarčik ◽  
Pavel Fuksa ◽  
Jaromír Šantrůček

2017 ◽  
Vol 405 ◽  
pp. 219-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Riofrío ◽  
Miren del Río ◽  
Hans Pretzsch ◽  
Felipe Bravo

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Efremova Tamara T. ◽  
◽  
Avrova Ada F. ◽  
Efremov Stanislav P. ◽  
Melentieva Nadejda V. ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Faid Abdul Manan ◽  
Muhammad Buce Saleh ◽  
I Nengah Surati Jaya ◽  
Uus Saepul Mukarom

This paper describes a development of an algorithm for assessing stand productivity by considering the stand variables. Forest stand productivity is one of the crucial information that required to establish the business plan for unit management at the beginning of forest planning activity. The main study objective is to find out the most significant and accurate variable combination to be used for assessing the forest stand productivity, as well as to develop productivity estimation model based on leaf area index. The study found the best stand variable combination in assessing stand productivity were density of poles (X2), volume of commercial tree having diameter at breast height (dbh) 20-40 cm (X16), basal area of commercial tree of dbh >40 cm (X20) with Kappa Accuracy of 90.56% for classifying into 5 stand productivity classes. It was recognized that the examined algorithm provides excellent accuracy of 100% when the stand productivity was classified into only 3 classes. The best model for assessing the stand productivity index with leaf area index is y = 0.6214x - 0.9928 with R2= 0.71, where y is productivity index and x is leaf area index.


2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara Eckhart ◽  
Elisabeth Pötzelsberger ◽  
Roland Koeck ◽  
Dominik Thom ◽  
Georg J. Lair ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (18) ◽  
pp. E4219-E4226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toby M. Maxwell ◽  
Lucas C. R. Silva ◽  
William R. Horwath

This study was designed to address a major source of uncertainty pertaining to coupled carbon–water cycles in montane forest ecosystems. The Sierra Nevada of California was used as a model system to investigate connections between the physiological performance of trees and landscape patterns of forest carbon and water use. The intrinsic water-use efficiency (iWUE)—an index of CO2 fixed per unit of potential water lost via transpiration—of nine dominant species was determined in replicated transects along an ∼1,500-m elevation gradient, spanning a broad range of climatic conditions and soils derived from three different parent materials. Stable isotope ratios of carbon and oxygen measured at the leaf level were combined with field-based and remotely sensed metrics of stand productivity, revealing that variation in iWUE depends primarily on leaf traits (∼24% of the variability), followed by stand productivity (∼16% of the variability), climatic regime (∼13% of the variability), and soil development (∼12% of the variability). Significant interactions between species composition and soil properties proved useful to predict changes in forest carbon–water relations. On the basis of observed shifts in tree species composition, ongoing since the 1950s and intensified in recent years, an increase in water loss through transpiration (ranging from 10 to 60% depending on parent material) is now expected in mixed conifer forests throughout the region.


2000 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Magnani ◽  
M. Mencuccini ◽  
J. Grace

2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 553-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvie Gauthier ◽  
Frédéric Raulier ◽  
Hakim Ouzennou ◽  
Jean-Pierre Saucier

As fire is a major disturbance in boreal forests, it is now recognized that it has to be taken into account in forest management planning. Moreover, as the time of exposure to fire is related to stand productivity, combining information on productivity and fire should help in assessing the potential to sustainably manage forests. We present a method to assess potential vulnerability to the risk of fire and illustrate it in the boreal coniferous forest of Quebec. This method takes into account some sources of uncertainty related to the estimation of productivity and fire risk. Spatialization of stand productivity from growth and yield curves allowed us to compute the area comprised of productive stands of each district with or without considering fire risk. Results showed that productive area is generally decreasing with decreasing degree-days, increasing elevation, or in relation to surficial geology. Furthermore, districts with moderate to good productivity were found to be vulnerable to fire when burn rates were greater than 0.333%·year–1. Our innovative approach allowed us to assess the vulnerability of the districts to fire and could be helpful in many regions in the context of a projected increase in future area burned under climate change.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document