On the Well-Posedness of Two Fluid Interfacial Flows with Surface Tension

Author(s):  
J. Thomas Beale ◽  
Thomas Y. Hou ◽  
John S. Lowengrub
Author(s):  
Anca-Voichita Matioc ◽  
Bogdan-Vasile Matioc

AbstractIn this paper we establish the well-posedness of the Muskat problem with surface tension and equal viscosities in the subcritical Sobolev spaces $$W^s_p(\mathbb {R})$$ W p s ( R ) , where $${p\in (1,2]}$$ p ∈ ( 1 , 2 ] and $${s\in (1+1/p,2)}$$ s ∈ ( 1 + 1 / p , 2 ) . This is achieved by showing that the mathematical model can be formulated as a quasilinear parabolic evolution problem in $$W^{\overline{s}-2}_p(\mathbb {R})$$ W p s ¯ - 2 ( R ) , where $${\overline{s}\in (1+1/p,s)}$$ s ¯ ∈ ( 1 + 1 / p , s ) . Moreover, we prove that the solutions become instantly smooth and we provide a criterion for the global existence of solutions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 627-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Durán

AbstractIn this paper a rotating two-fluid model for the propagation of internal waves is introduced. The model can be derived from a rotating-fluid problem by including gravity effects or from a nonrotating one by adding rotational forces in the dispersion balance. The physical regime of validation is discussed and mathematical properties of the new system, concerning well-posedness, conservation laws and existence of solitary-wave solutions, are analyzed.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohann Vautrin ◽  
Etienne Muller ◽  
Dominique Pelletier ◽  
Stéphane Etienne ◽  
Cédric Béguin

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 2420-2423
Author(s):  
A. Sheikhi ◽  
A. Ecder

2016 ◽  
Vol 806 ◽  
pp. 356-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Dodd ◽  
Antonino Ferrante

Droplets in turbulent flows behave differently from solid particles, e.g. droplets deform, break up, coalesce and have internal fluid circulation. Our objective is to gain a fundamental understanding of the physical mechanisms of droplet–turbulence interaction. We performed direct numerical simulations (DNS) of 3130 finite-size, non-evaporating droplets of diameter approximately equal to the Taylor length scale and with 5 % droplet volume fraction in decaying isotropic turbulence at initial Taylor-scale Reynolds number $\mathit{Re}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}}=83$. In the droplet-laden cases, we varied one of the following three parameters: the droplet Weber number based on the r.m.s. velocity of turbulence ($0.1\leqslant \mathit{We}_{rms}\leqslant 5$), the droplet- to carrier-fluid density ratio ($1\leqslant \unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{d}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{c}\leqslant 100$) or the droplet- to carrier-fluid viscosity ratio ($1\leqslant \unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{d}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{c}\leqslant 100$). In this work, we derive the turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) equations for the two-fluid, carrier-fluid and droplet-fluid flow. These equations allow us to explain the pathways for TKE exchange between the carrier turbulent flow and the flow inside the droplet. We also explain the role of the interfacial surface energy in the two-fluid TKE equation through the power of the surface tension. Furthermore, we derive the relationship between the power of surface tension and the rate of change of total droplet surface area. This link allows us to explain how droplet deformation, breakup and coalescence play roles in the temporal evolution of TKE. Our DNS results show that increasing $\mathit{We}_{rms}$, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{d}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{c}$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{d}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{c}$ increases the decay rate of the two-fluid TKE. The droplets enhance the dissipation rate of TKE by enhancing the local velocity gradients near the droplet interface. The power of the surface tension is a source or sink of the two-fluid TKE depending on the sign of the rate of change of the total droplet surface area. Thus, we show that, through the power of the surface tension, droplet coalescence is a source of TKE and breakup is a sink of TKE. For short times, the power of the surface tension is less than $\pm 5\,\%$ of the dissipation rate. For later times, the power of the surface tension is always a source of TKE, and its magnitude can be up to 50 % of the dissipation rate.


2016 ◽  
Vol 138 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Avinash Vaidheeswaran ◽  
Martin Lopez de Bertodano

Analytical expressions for interfacial pressure coefficients are obtained based on the geometry of the bubbles occurring in two-phase flows. It is known that the shape of the bubbles affects the virtual mass and interfacial pressure coefficients, which in turn determines the cutoff void fraction for the well-posedness of two-fluid model (TFM). The coefficient used in the interfacial pressure difference correlation is derived assuming potential flow around a perfect sphere. In reality, the bubbles seen in two-phase flows get deformed, and hence, it is required to estimate the coefficients for nonspherical geometries. Oblate and prolate ellipsoids are considered, and their respective coefficients are determined. It is seen that the well-posedness limit of the TFM is determined by the combination of virtual mass and interfacial pressure coefficient used. The effect of flow separation on the coefficient values is also analyzed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document