A Novel Architecture Design for Complex Network Measures of Brain Connectivity Aiding Diagnosis

2021 ◽  
pp. 281-302
Author(s):  
Chandrajit Pal ◽  
Amit Acharyya
NeuroImage ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 1059-1069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikail Rubinov ◽  
Olaf Sporns

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. S121-S131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gautam Prasad ◽  
Shantanu H. Joshi ◽  
Talia M. Nir ◽  
Arthur W. Toga ◽  
Paul M. Thompson

2013 ◽  
Vol 357-360 ◽  
pp. 349-353
Author(s):  
Xiao Ming Hu ◽  
Qiang Liu

We all know that the design thinking in architecture design is quite complex. However, the most existing studies on design thinking have been based upon reductionism. By introducing complex network theory, complexity perspective is used to re-interpret the architectural design in this paper. Moreover, the characteristics, rules and thinking characteristics of architectural creation are revealed by the characteristics of complex network. The paper advocates combining holism and reductionism to guide the architectural design, and pointed out that synesthesia exists among different factors of complex network. Based upon the scientific analysis on several famous cases, the author pointed out the great importance of synesthesia in architects' design thinking.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (08) ◽  
pp. 1950058
Author(s):  
Adriano J. Holanda ◽  
Mariane Matias ◽  
Sueli M. S. P. Ferreira ◽  
Gisele M. L. Benevides ◽  
Osame Kinouchi

We compared the social character networks of biographical, legendary and fictional texts in search for marks of genre differentiation. We examined the degree distribution of character appearance and found a power-law-like distribution that does not depend on the literary genre. We also analyzed local and global complex network measures, in particular, correlation plots between the recently introduced Lobby index and degree, betweenness and closeness centralities. Assortativity plots, which previous literature claims to separate fictional from real social networks, were also studied. We found no relevant differences among genres for the books studied when applying these network measures and we provide an explanation why the previous assortativity result is not correct.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murillo G. Carneiro ◽  
Barbara C. Gama ◽  
Otavio S. Ribeiro

Author(s):  
Joao Ricardo Sato ◽  
Maciel Calebe Vidal ◽  
Suzana de Siqueira Santos ◽  
Katlin Brauer Massirer ◽  
Andre Fujita

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruofan Wang ◽  
Yiyang Yin ◽  
Ying Gui ◽  
Haodong Wang ◽  
Lianshuan Shi

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (04) ◽  
pp. 2150023
Author(s):  
Vinícius H. Resende ◽  
Murillo G. Carneiro

Most multi-label learning (MLL) techniques perform classification by analyzing only the physical features of the data, which means they are unable to consider high-level features, such as structural and topological ones. Consequently, they have trouble to detect the semantic meaning of the data (e.g., formation pattern). To handle this problem, a high-level framework has been recently proposed to the MLL task, in which the high-level features are extracted using the analysis of complex network measures. In this paper, we extend that work by evaluating different combinations of four complex networks measures, namely clustering coefficient, assortativity, average degree and average path length. Experiments conducted over seven real-world data sets showed that the low-level techniques often can have their predictive performance improved after being combined with high-level ones, and also demonstrated that there is no a unique measure that provides the best results, i.e., different problems may ask for different network properties in order to have their high-level patterns efficiently detected.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document