Estimation of genetic parameters for in vitro traits in wheat immature embryo cultures involving high X low regeneration capacity genotypes

Euphytica ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. N. Barakat
2014 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 316-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yogo Adhi Nugroho ◽  
I. Made Sumertajaya ◽  
Ni Made Armini Wiendi ◽  
Nurita Toruan-Mathius

2015 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 1033-1038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thais Roseli Corrêa ◽  
Sérgio Yoshimitsu Motoike ◽  
Sara Morra Coser ◽  
Gustavo da Silveira ◽  
Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Murín ◽  
K. Mészáros ◽  
P. Nemeček ◽  
R. Kuna ◽  
J. Faragó

The effect of explant type (immature vs. mature embryos) and two auxin types (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid vs. Dicamba) on the callogenesis and plant regeneration ability of 26 wheat cultivars was studied. In general, the callus induction, plant regeneration and shoot formation frequencies were higher in mature embryo-derived cultures as compared to immature ones on media originally developed for mature wheat embryo cultures. In both culture types, the auxin Dicamba was found to be more efficient, especially when mature embryos were cultured. The separation of means using Duncan’s multiple range test revealed the best in vitro response, in terms of the frequency of callus regeneration, in the cultivar Astella for both immature and mature embryo cultures. This cultivar gave very promising results, suggesting that it could be used in the future for further tissue culture investigations and as a donor material for genetic transformation experiments in wheat. Correlation analyses revealed significant similarities between the evaluated parameters within each group (immature and mature embryo-derived cultures). However, there were no significant correlations between these two groups for most of the parameters. This suggests that the mechanism of plant regeneration in the two in vitro regeneration systems (mature vs. immature embryo culture) may be different enough to hamper the development of an optimal plant regeneration protocol for use in both systems.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
José Luis Solís Bonilla ◽  
Uilson Vanderlei Lopes ◽  
Alfredo Zamarripa Colmenero ◽  
Biaani Beeu Martínez Valencia ◽  
Carlos Hugo Avendaño Arrazate ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document