Antibodies to histones and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: A comparative study with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunoblotting

1986 ◽  
Vol 278 (5) ◽  
pp. 410-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Konstantinov ◽  
V. Russanova ◽  
V. Russeva





2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (20) ◽  
pp. 4788
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Pawlak-Buś ◽  
Wiktor Schmidt ◽  
Piotr Leszczyński

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by the production of multiple autoantibodies, resulting in tissue and organ damage. Recent studies have revealed that interleukin-23 (IL-23) and interleukin-27 (IL-27) may be therapeutically relevant in selected SLE manifestations. This study aimed to identify associations between serum IL-27 and IL-23 levels and disease activity in Polish patients with different manifestations of SLE: neuropsychiatric lupus (NPSLE), and lupus nephritis (LN). Associations between interleukin levels and oligo-specific antibodies against double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), dose of glucocorticoids, and type of treatment were also analyzed. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to assess anti-dsDNA antibodies and analyze the serum concentration of IL-27 and IL-23 from 72 patients aged 19–74 years with confirmed active SLE. Disease activity was measured using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI 2-K). No significant correlations between interleukin levels and SLEDAI score, anti-dsDNA, corticosteroid dose, or type of treatment were noted. Patients with NPSLE and LN presented the highest median scores of SLEDAI.



1983 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 823-827 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Ishaq ◽  
R Ali

Abstract In this enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection of antibodies against extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) in sera of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), nylon is used as solid phase for antigen binding instead of the commonly used polystyrene surface. Optimal conditions for activation of the nylon beads, antigen coating, and other relevant factors have been investigated. We compared the incidence of anti-ENA antibodies in SLE, using chromogenic and fluorogenic enzyme substrates. Of SLE patients, 54% were positive for anti-ENA antibodies when chromogenic substrate was used as compared with 68% for fluorogenic substrate. Antibody activity against Sm and RNP antigens was distinguished on the basis of ribonuclease sensitivity of the RNP antigen. The method described offers advantages such as decreased background activity, increased surface area, facility for prolonged storage of antigen-coated solid phase, and miniaturization of the assay.





Lupus ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (14) ◽  
pp. 1494-1500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z Rezaieyazdi ◽  
M Sahebari ◽  
MR Hatef ◽  
B Abbasi ◽  
H Rafatpanah ◽  
...  

The role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) as an inflammatory marker is still controversial. Recently, more sensitive methods, such as high sensitive CRP (hs-CRP) have been used to detect micro-inflammation. The role of hs-CRP in lupus flare has not been documented well. We conducted this study to examine the correlation between hs-CRP serum concentrations and disease activity in lupus. Ninety-two SLE patients and 49 healthy controls contributed to our study. Most confounding factors influencing the hs-CRP values were excluded. Disease activity was estimated using the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI-2K). hs-CRP values were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit. Serum values of hs-CRP were significantly higher ( p < 0.001, z = 3.29) in patients compared with healthy controls. The cutoff point for hs-CRP between patients and controls was 0.93 mg/L (Youden’s Index = 0.39). There was no correlation between hs-CRP serum levels and disease activity. Furthermore, hs-CRP values did not correlate with any of the laboratory parameters, except for C3 ( p = 0.003, rs = −0.2) and C4 ( p = 0.02, rs = −0.1). Although hs-CRP serum levels were significantly higher in lupus patients compared with healthy controls, it seems that this marker is not a good indicator for disease activity.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document