Applying flow cytometric single cell analysis, we compared the performance of UV excitation from argon ion and HeCd lasers using various UV-excitable fluorochromes of cell kinetic and cell physiological relevance. The AT-specific DNA fluorochromes DAPI, Hoechst 33258, and Hoechst 33342 showed no significant differences of G1-phase resolution and cell cycle distribution. With the HeCd laser, high-resolution cell kinetic analysis applying the novel BrdU/Hoechst-PI quenching technique showed superior resolution and an almost normalized G2M/G1 channel ratio of the first cell cycle. Indo-1 analysis for detection of intracellular free calcium gave similar results for both excitation sources, although the indo-1 ratio of activated cells was lower for HeCd excitation. Monochlorobimane as an indicator fluorochrome of glutathione content could not be excited sufficiently with the 325-nm line of the HeCd laser and exhibited poor resolution between positive and negative cells. However, the second glutathione-specific fluorochrome o-phtalaldehyde gave even better results with the HeCd laser. Our data indicate that air-cooled HeCd lasers are cheap and reliable UV-excitation sources for most UV-excitable fluorochromes, and might be an alternative to the expensive water-cooled argon and krypton laser.
UV lasers for flow cytometric analysis: HeCd versus argon laser excitation.