Can inefficient public production promote welfare?

1985 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Peters
Keyword(s):  
Public Production

Corruption as “one‑stop‑shop”: theory and empirical analysis

2018 ◽  
pp. 32-51
Author(s):  
R. Yu. Kochnev ◽  
L. I. Polishchuk ◽  
A. Yu. Rubin
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Business Environment ◽  
Enterprise Performance ◽  
Double Jeopardy ◽  
One Stop ◽  
The Commons ◽  
Public Production ◽  
Performance Project ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Sector Theory

We present the comparative analysis of the impact of centralized and decentralized corruption for private sector. Theory and empirical evidence point out to a “double jeopardy” of decentralized corruption which increases the burden of corruption upon private firms and weakens the incentives of bureaucracy to provide public production inputs, such as infrastructure. These outcomes are produced by simultaneous free-riding and the tragedy of the commons effects. The empirical part of the paper utilizes data of the Business Environment and Enterprise Performance project.

scholarly journals INVESTMENTPROJECTS IN LOGISTICS SYSTEMS

2020 ◽  
pp. 45-54
Author(s):  
Yuliya Prykhno ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Research Topic ◽  
Reproductive Structure ◽  
Production Potential ◽  
Management Tools ◽  
Investment Projects ◽  
Logistics Systems ◽  
Business Entities ◽  
Public Production ◽  
Many Sources ◽  
Investment Process

Scientists have researched and scientificallysubstantiated the significant effect of the use of project management tools on all business entities and on the country's economy as a whole. At the same time, in modern conditionsactive economic development and turbulenceenvironment, lead to the fact that considerable attention should be given tothe strategic line of conduct of enterprises. The strategy allows to take into account the capabilities of the enterprise, as well as investment projects in various strategic business areas. Despite the fact that many sources describe the process of the development of logistics systems through investment projects; in practice it is very difficult to implement.For the implementation of investment projects of the enterprise it is necessary to present this process in the form of a set of formalized procedures or in the form of step-by-step sequence of actions for choosing the best option for an investment project.This problem is especially relevant for logistics systems, because their activities are carried out in the form of many projects. Increasing the volume of investments and improving the efficiency of investment management in logistics systems is one of the fundamental conditions for reducing the duration of the production and sales cycle, which creates the preconditions for economic growth by accelerating the turnover of funds. The production potential of economic entities, their efficiency, and hence the sectoral and reproductive structure of all public production will largely depend on the investment projects, both at the micro and at the macro logistical level.Unsolved in practical terms of the problem of improving the investment process and management of investment activities in logistics systems, the need to develop a methodology for analyzing and modeling the investment activities of logistics systems in the context of the transformation of the economy, as well as insufficient coverage of this problem in domestic and foreign literature determined the relevance of the research topic.

Sociocultural portrait of the Leningrad member of cooperative (1987-1991)

2021 ◽  
pp. 34-40
Author(s):  
Aleksandr Nikolaevich Chudetсkii
Keyword(s):  
Urban Society ◽  
Work Skills ◽  
State Sector ◽  
Cooperative Movement ◽  
Cooperative Community ◽  
Archival Documents ◽  
Working Age ◽  
Sociocultural Characteristics ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Public Production

The subject of this research is the participants of cooperative movement that unfolded in Leningrad in 1987 – 1991. During this period, the country legalized the citizens’ right to establish industrial cooperatives, which de facto have become private enterprises. Leningrad turned into one of the largest centers of cooperative movement in the USSR, and members of the cooperatives – a considerable part of urban society. Attention is given to the situation of cooperatives in Leningrad prior to their transition into the non-state sector of the economy. The author explores such sociocultural characteristics of the cooperative member as the attitude towards socialist system, Soviet regime, experience of party and Komsomol life, work skills, and age characteristics. It is revealed that the majority of participants of cooperative movement prior to transition into the non-state sector of the economy had a stable social status and were loyal to the Soviet system, and many of them held senior positions. Among the members of cooperative were also the members of CPSU and Komsomol activists. Their performance efficiency and high professionalism were often noted by the party and state authorities. This casts doubt on the widespread opinion about the marginal status of the participants of cooperative movement. Moreover, the attempt to attract people not involved in public production was unsuccessful; compared to the working age citizens, householders, pensioners, people with disabilities, and students met in the cooperative community were a rarity. The article relies on the archival documents, newspaper materials, sources of personal origin, as well as the results of interviews conducted by the author with former employees of the cooperative.

Strategic Corporations: Public Production

2019 ◽  
pp. 69-90
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Huber
Keyword(s):  
Public Production

Shadow prices for public production in an open economy with disequilibrium

1990 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Maurice Marchand ◽  
Pierre Pestieau
Keyword(s):  
Open Economy ◽  
Shadow Prices ◽  
Public Production
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document