Management of anorectal malformations during the newborn period

1993 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Peña
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prashanth Madapura Virupakshappa ◽  
Nidhi Rajendra

Background: Surgical emergencies in the newborns are an important and integral part of neonatal admissions in any tertiary Neonatal intensive care units. Surgical emergencies in the newborn constitute congenital anomalies and acquired neonatal emergencies. It is necessary to know the burden of these illnesses and their spectrum by regular auditing the data available to understand the relative incidence and outcome of these neonatal emergencies. Aims and objective of the study is to determine the spectrum of the different neonatal surgical emergencies (congenital and acquired) admitted, operated and managed in a tertiary NICU from June 2001 to May 2011(10 yrs) in a medical college teaching hospital in South IndiaMethods: The data was collected by retrospectively auditing the hospital pediatric and neonatal admission registry, neonatal surgical registry, admission case sheets from June 2001 to June 2011 (10 yrs). Data was analysed. Only confirmed post-operative surgical diagnosis were considered for inclusion in the study.Results: Of the 13,118 newborns admitted in the NICU in 10 years, 601 cases (4.6%) were surgical neonates which were treated in the unit. 83.5% of surgical neonates were operated for congenital surgical disorders. Gastrointestinal anomalies (50%) were the leading causes of neonatal surgical emergencies. Anorectal malformations (18.5%), idiopathic hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (10.6%) and esophageal atresia with/without tracheo-esophageal fistula (8.7%) were the leading surgical causes which needed immediate surgical intervention in the newborn period. 28 different spectrum of cases were operated including 15 rarer once (<1% incidence each).Conclusions: Surgical new-borns comprises of an important and integral part of neonatal admissions (4.6/100 neonatal admissions). The incidence of the rarer diseases constitutes 8% of the total surgical cases. Gastrointestinal anomalies are the leading causes requiring surgical interventions in the immediate newborn period. It is worthy to understand the spectrum of illnesses in any tertiary unit by regularly auditing the data available.


2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
pp. e57-e59
Author(s):  
Alejandra Vilanova-Sánchez ◽  
Christina Ching ◽  
Alessandra Gasior ◽  
Karen Diefenbach ◽  
Richard Wood ◽  
...  

AbstractCloacal exstrophy is the most severe type of anorectal malformations that belongs to the bladder–exstrophy–epispadias complex of genitourinary malformations. Interestingly, its variant, the covered cloacal exstrophy, is often missed. The clinical findings of this variant may include an imperforate anus, low lying umbilicus, thick pubic bone, and pubic diastasis but with an intact abdominal wall. We present an interesting case of covered cloacal exstrophy with a side-by-side duplicated bladder and discuss important considerations for the time of colostomy creation in the newborn period.


Author(s):  
Sabine Sarnacki ◽  
Sebastian King ◽  
Wilfried Krois

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 500-503
Author(s):  
Triptee Agrawal ◽  
Hem Sagar Rimal

Anorectal malformations are defined by the relationship of the rectum to the sphincter complex and can be classified as high and low anomaly based on whether meconium is present or absent, presence of dimple, anocutaneous reflex, sacral abnormality or presence of meconium in urine. The diagnosis should be made in the delivery room by inspecting the perineum. Meconuria with absence of anal opening invariably indicates a high malformation which requires a colostomy in the newborn period. Low malformations do not become evident until 24 hours when the meconium may show up in the perineal fistula. These defects can be managed by a perineal anoplasty without a colostomy in the newborn period. A prone cross table lateral shoot abdominal film is required if clinical information at 24 hours is insufficient to decide whether a colostomy is needed. We present a case of newborn, day 4 of life, who did not pass meconium since birth, had abdominal distension, vomiting, poor feeding and lethargy since last 2 days. Anal area showed pigmentation with presence of median raphe, anal dimple and slightly formed anal opening. Baby was initially thought as a case of low type imperforate anus. On further evaluation, was found to have meconuria too. Invertogram done showed high type defect. Rest of the examination was normal. Supportive therapy was initiated and baby underwent transverse loop colostomy for high type imperforate anus on day 5 of life. So it is always advisable to confirm the type of anorectal malformation both clinically and by doing required investigation before deciding for any operative intervention like colostomy or anoplasty, as clinical examination and investigation may not correlate in all occasions. Evaluation should also include screening out for associations and other sacral anomalies.  BJHS 2018;3(2)6: 500-503.


Author(s):  
Anna Svenningsson ◽  
Anna Gunnarsdottir ◽  
Tomas Wester

Abstract Introduction Colorectal cancer (CRC) has been reported in early adulthood in patients with anorectal malformation (ARM), and therefore, the need of endoscopic controls has been discussed. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of CRC in patients with ARM. Materials and Methods This was a nationwide population-based study with data from Swedish national health care registers. All patients diagnosed with ARM born in Sweden between 1964 and 1999 were identified in the National Patient Register. The same group was followed up in the Swedish Cancer Register from birth to December 31, 2014, for occurrences of CRC. Five age- and gender-matched individuals randomly selected from the Medical Birth Register served as controls for each ARM patient born between 1973 and 1999. Results A total of 817 patients (474 males) with ARM were included and followed up from birth to the end of observational period. Time of follow-up ranged from 15 to 50 years (mean: 28 years). None of the patients was diagnosed with CRC during the observational period. One case of rectal cancer and one case of sigmoid cancer were detected among the 3,760 controls. Conclusion In our study, the risk of CRC in early adulthood in patients with ARM is low. Our result does not support routine endoscopic follow-up for patients with ARM during the first decade of life.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document