Perioperative blood transfusions reduce long-term survival following surgery for colorectal cancer

1998 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 451-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom-H. Edna ◽  
Tormod Bjerkeset
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcella Arru ◽  
Luca Aldrighetti ◽  
Renato Castoldi ◽  
Saverio Di Palo ◽  
Elena Orsenigo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Xu ◽  
Cong Li ◽  
Charlie Zhi-Lin Zheng ◽  
Yu-Qin Zhang ◽  
Tian-An Guo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome. Comparison of prognosis between LS and sporadic CRC (SCRC) were rare,with conflicting results. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes between patients with LS and SCRC. Methods Between June 2008 and September 2018, a total of 47 patients were diagnosed with LS by genetic testing at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. A 1:2 propensity score matching was performed to obtain homogeneous cohorts from SCRC group. Thereafter, 94 SCRC patients were enrolled as control group. The long-term survival rates between the two groups were compared, and the prognostic factors were also analyzed. Results The 5-year OS rate of LS group was 97.6%, which was significantly higher than of 82.6% for SCRC group (p = 0.029). The 5-year PFS rate showed no significant differences between the two groups (78.0% for LS group vs. 70.6% for SCRC patients; p = 0.262). The 5-year TFS rates in LS group was 62.1% for LS patients, which were significantly lower than of 70.6% for SCRC group (p = 0.039). By multivariate analysis, we found that tumor progression of primary CRC and TNM staging were independent risk factors for OS. Conclusion LS patients have better long-term survival prognosis than SCRC patients. Strict regular follow-up monitoring, detection at earlier tumor stages, and effective treatment are key to ensuring better long-term prognosis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (13) ◽  
pp. 3874-3882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda B. M. Weerink ◽  
Christina M. Gant ◽  
Barbara L. van Leeuwen ◽  
Geertruida H. de Bock ◽  
Ewout A. Kouwenhoven ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-322
Author(s):  
Irena Míková ◽  
Denisa Kyselová ◽  
Dana Kautznerová ◽  
Marek Tupý ◽  
Marek Kysela ◽  
...  

Introduction: Sarcopenia (severe muscle depletion) and myosteaosis (pathological fat accumulation in muscle) are frequent muscle abnormalities in patients with cirrhosis associated with unfavorable prognosis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of sarcopenia and myosteatosis in liver transplant (LT) candidates in our center on the peritransplant course and patient and graft survival. Methods: This prospective study included adult LT candidates who underwent clinical and laboratory examination. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) at L3 level and radiodensity of psoas major muscle (PM-RA) were evaluated by CT. Results: Pretransplant sarcopenia was found in 49 of 103 patients (47.6%) and myosteatosis in 53 (51.5%) patients. Patients with sarcopenia had lower BMI, waist circumference, occurrence of hypertension and metabolic syndrome and lower triglyceride and C-peptide levels than patients without sarcopenia. Patients with myosteatosis had higher Child-Pugh score and lower HDL-cholesterol levels than patients without myosteatosis. Pretransplant SMI negatively correlated with the amount of blood transfusions given during LT and occurrence of biliary complications. Patients with myosteatosis had higher need for blood transfusions during LT and after LT, and higher number of surgical revisions. Occurrence of sarcopenia had no significant effect on patient and graft survival. Patients with myosteatosis had worse long-term survival than patients without myosteatosis, the graft survival did not differ. Conclusion: Sarcopenia and myosteatosis are frequent muscle abnormalities in LT candidates with negative impact on peritransplant course. Myosteatosis was associated with a worse long-term survival in our study. Key words: sarcopenia – myosteatosis – liver transplantation – prevalence – complications – survival


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document