Stable model checking for disjunctive logic programs

1996 ◽  
pp. 265-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Leone ◽  
P. Rullo ◽  
F. Scarcello
Keyword(s):  
Model Checking ◽  
Stable Model ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Disjunctive Logic Programs

scholarly journals Modularity Aspects of Disjunctive Stable Models

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 813-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Janhunen ◽  
E. Oikarinen ◽  
H. Tompits ◽  
S. Woltran
Keyword(s):  
Programming Languages ◽  
Connected Components ◽  
Stable Model ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Strongly Connected Components ◽  
Verification Method ◽  
Strongly Connected ◽  
Disjunctive Logic Programs ◽  
Mutual Comparison ◽  
Output Interface

Practically all programming languages allow the programmer to split a program into several modules which brings along several advantages in software development. In this paper, we are interested in the area of answer-set programming where fully declarative and nonmonotonic languages are applied. In this context, obtaining a modular structure for programs is by no means straightforward since the output of an entire program cannot in general be composed from the output of its components. To better understand the effects of disjunctive information on modularity we restrict the scope of analysis to the case of disjunctive logic programs (DLPs) subject to stable-model semantics. We define the notion of a DLP-function, where a well-defined input/output interface is provided, and establish a novel module theorem which indicates the compositionality of stable-model semantics for DLP-functions. The module theorem extends the well-known splitting-set theorem and enables the decomposition of DLP-functions given their strongly connected components based on positive dependencies induced by rules. In this setting, it is also possible to split shared disjunctive rules among components using a generalized shifting technique. The concept of modular equivalence is introduced for the mutual comparison of DLP-functions using a generalization of a translation-based verification method.

scholarly journals Justifications for programs with disjunctive and causal-choice rules

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 587-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
PEDRO CABALAR ◽  
JORGE FANDINNO
Keyword(s):  
Choice Rule ◽  
Algebraic Expression ◽  
Stable Model ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Causal Information ◽  
Disjunctive Logic Programs ◽  
New Type ◽  
Algebraic Operations ◽  
Disjunctive Programs ◽  
Stable Models

AbstractIn this paper, we study an extension of the stable model semantics for disjunctive logic programs where each true atom in a model is associated with an algebraic expression (in terms of rule labels) that represents its justifications. As in our previous work for non-disjunctive programs, these justifications are obtained in a purely semantic way, by algebraic operations (product, addition and application) on a lattice of causal values. Our new definition extends the concept ofcausal stable modelto disjunctive logic programs and satisfies that each (standard) stable model corresponds to a disjoint class of causal stable models sharing the same truth assignments, but possibly varying the obtained explanations. We provide a pair of illustrative examples showing the behaviour of the new semantics and discuss the need of introducing a new type of rule, which we callcausal-choice. This type of rule intuitively captures the idea of “Amay causeB” and, when causal information is disregarded, amounts to a usual choice rule under the standard stable model semantics.

Disjunctive logic programs with existential quantification in rule heads

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 563-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
JIA-HUAI YOU ◽  
HENG ZHANG ◽  
YAN ZHANG
Keyword(s):  
Stable Model ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Disjunctive Logic Programs ◽  
Decidable Fragment ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Existential Quantification ◽  
Disjunctive Programs ◽  
Second Order Logic ◽  
Stable Models

AbstractWe consider disjunctive logic programs without function symbols but with existential quantification in rule heads, under the semantics of general stable models. There are at least two interesting prospects in these programs. The first is that a program can be made more succinct by using existential variables, and the second is on the potential in representing defeasible ontological knowledge by these logic programs. This paper studies some of the properties of these programs. First, we show a simple yet intuitive definition of stable models for these programs that does not resort to second-order logic. Second, the stable models of these programs can be characterized by an extension of progression for disjunctive programs, which provides a native characterization of justification for stable models. We then study the decidability issue. While the stable model existence problem for safe disjunctive programs is decidable, with existential quantification allowed in rule heads the problem becomes undecidable. We identify an interesting decidable fragment by exploring a new notion of stratification over existential quantification.

scholarly journals Thirty years of Epistemic Specifications

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-41
Author(s):  
JORGE FANDINNO ◽  
WOLFGANG FABER ◽  
MICHAEL GELFOND
Keyword(s):  
State Of The Art ◽  
World View ◽  
Formal Semantics ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Knowledge Representation And Reasoning ◽  
Stable Model ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Current State ◽  
Closed World ◽  
Disjunctive Logic Programs

Abstract The language of epistemic specifications and epistemic logic programs extends disjunctive logic programs under the stable model semantics with modal constructs called subjective literals. Using subjective literals, it is possible to check whether a regular literal is true in every or some stable models of the program, those models, in this context also called belief sets, being collected in a set called world view. This allows for representing, within the language, whether some proposition should be understood accordingly to the open or the closed world assumption. Several attempts for capturing the intuitions underlying the language by means of a formal semantics were given, resulting in a multitude of proposals that makes it difficult to understand the current state of the art. In this article, we provide an overview of the inception of the field and the knowledge representation and reasoning tasks it is suitable for. We also provide a detailed analysis of properties of proposed semantics, and an outlook of challenges to be tackled by future research in the area.

scholarly journals Extending Well-Founded Semantics with Clark’s Completion for Disjunctive Logic Programs

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Juan Carlos Nieves ◽  
Mauricio Osorio
Keyword(s):  
Aggregation Operator ◽  
Stable Model ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Complete Lattices ◽  
Transformation Rules ◽  
Disjunctive Program ◽  
Stable Semantics ◽  
Disjunctive Logic Programs ◽  
Disjunctive Programs ◽  
Explicit Negation

In this paper, we introduce new semantics (that we call D3-WFS-DCOMP) and compare it with the stable semantics (STABLE). For normal programs, this semantics is based onsuitableintegration of the well-founded semantics (WFS) and the Clark’s completion. D3-WFS-DCOM has the following appealing properties: First, it agrees with STABLE in the sense that it never defines a nonminimal model or a nonminimal supported model. Second, for normal programs it extends WFS. Third, every stable model of a disjunctive programPis a D3-WFS-DCOM model ofP. Fourth, it is constructed using transformation rules accepted by STABLE. We also introduce second semantics that we call D2-WFS-DCOMP. We show that D2-WFS-DCOMP is equivalent to D3-WFS-DCOMP for normal programs but this is not the case for disjunctive programs. We also introduce third new semantics that supports the use of implicit disjunctions. We illustrate how these semantics can be extended to programs including explicit negation, default negation in the head of a clause, and aluboperator, which is a generalization of the aggregation operatorsetofover arbitrary complete lattices.

scholarly journals Disjunctive ASP with functions: Decidable queries and effective computation

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (4-6) ◽  
pp. 497-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARIO ALVIANO ◽  
WOLFGANG FABER ◽  
NICOLA LEONE
Keyword(s):  
Query Answering ◽  
Query Evaluation ◽  
Stable Model ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Disjunctive Logic Programs ◽  
Magic Set

AbstractQuerying over disjunctive ASP with functions is a highly undecidable task in general. In this paper we focus on disjunctive logic programs with stratified negation and functions under the stable model semantics (ASPfs). We show that query answering in this setting is decidable, if the query is finitely recursive (ASPfsfr). Our proof yields also an effective method for query evaluation. It is done by extending the magic set technique to ASPfsfr. We show that the magic-set rewritten program is query equivalent to the original one (under both brave and cautious reasoning). Moreover, we prove that the rewritten program is also finitely ground, implying that it is decidable. Importantly, finitely ground programs are evaluable using existing ASP solvers, making the class of ASPfsfr queries usable in practice.

scholarly journals Characterizations of stable model semantics for logic programs with arbitrary constraint atoms

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 529-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
YI-DONG SHEN ◽  
JIA-HUAI YOU ◽  
LI-YAN YUAN
Keyword(s):  
The Body ◽  
Stable Model ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Abstract Representation ◽  
Disjunctive Logic Programs ◽  
The One ◽  
Answer Sets ◽  
Semantics Of Logic Programs ◽  
Natural Way ◽  
Stable Models

AbstractThis paper studies the stable model semantics of logic programs with (abstract) constraint atoms and their properties. We introduce a succinct abstract representation of these constraint atoms in which a constraint atom is represented compactly. We show two applications. First, under this representation of constraint atoms, we generalize the Gelfond–Lifschitz transformation and apply it to define stable models (also called answer sets) for logic programs with arbitrary constraint atoms. The resulting semantics turns out to coincide with the one defined by Son et al. (2007), which is based on a fixpoint approach. One advantage of our approach is that it can be applied, in a natural way, to define stable models for disjunctive logic programs with constraint atoms, which may appear in the disjunctive head as well as in the body of a rule. As a result, our approach to the stable model semantics for logic programs with constraint atoms generalizes a number of previous approaches. Second, we show that our abstract representation of constraint atoms provides a means to characterize dependencies of atoms in a program with constraint atoms, so that some standard characterizations and properties relying on these dependencies in the past for logic programs with ordinary atoms can be extended to logic programs with constraint atoms.

Well-Founded Semantics Coincides with Three-Valued Stable Semantics1

1990 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 445-463
Author(s):  
Teodor Przymusinski
Keyword(s):  
Logic Program ◽  
Natural Extension ◽  
Natural Generalization ◽  
Stable Model ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Default Theory ◽  
Recent Approach ◽  
Stable Semantics ◽  
Disjunctive Logic Programs ◽  
Stable Models

We introduce 3-valued stable models which are a natural generalization of standard (2-valued) stable models. We show that every logic program P has at least one 3-valued stable model and that the well-founded model of any program P [Van Gelder et al., 1990] coincides with the smallest 3-valued stable model of P. We conclude that the well-founded semantics of an arbitrary logic program coincides with the 3-valued stable model semantics. The 3-valued stable semantics is closely related to non-monotonic formalisms in AI. Namely, every program P can be translated into a suitable autoepistemic (resp. default) theory P ˆ so that the 3-valued stable semantics of P coincides with the (3-valued) autoepistemic (resp. default) semantics of P ˆ. Similar results hold for circumscription and CWA. Moreover, it can be shown that the 3-valued stable semantics has a natural extension to the class of all disjunctive logic programs and deductive databases. Finally, following upon the recent approach developed by Gelfond and Lifschitz, we extend all of our results to more general logic programs which, in addition to the use of negation as failure, permit the use of classical negation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document