Net Ecosystem Production of Two Contrasting Boreal Black Spruce Forest Communities

Ecosystems ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 248-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari E. B. O'Connell ◽  
Stith T. Gower ◽  
John M. Norman
Ecosystems ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 236-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari E. B. O'Connell ◽  
Stith T. Gower ◽  
John M. Norman

1979 ◽  
Vol 57 (23) ◽  
pp. 2644-2656 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. T. Dyrness ◽  
D. F. Grigal

Five distinct forest communities were recognized along a 3-km transect. These are, listed in order of decreasing elevation: (i) open black spruce/feathermoss - Cladonia, (ii) closed black spruce/feathermoss, (iii) open black spruce/Sphagnum, (iv) black spruce woodland/Eriophorum, and (v) white spruce/alder/Calamagrostis (restricted to a narrow band adjacent to a stream). Several techniques of ordination were used to recognize these five forest communities plus two intergrades: (open black spruce/feathermoss - Cladonia) - (Sphagnum) and open black spruce/Sphagnum - woodland/Eriophorum.The distribution of two-thirds of the plant species was highly correlated with vegetation–slope zones. Results of the fit of Gaussian curves also suggest that vegetation boundaries were well placed. The distribution of the four soil series in the area was well correlated with vegetation–slope zones: three were limited to one zone each. Permafrost, absent from the soil on the ridgetop and upper slope, was generally within 40 to 50 cm of the surface elsewhere and tended to be at shallower depths as elevation decreased. The most striking differences in forest floor properties were found in the white spruce zone compared with the six black spruce dominated zones. The white spruce forest floor was markedly thinner and had higher levels of nutrients. In the six black spruce dominated zones, forest floor thickness and concentrations of N and Mg tended to increase with distance downslope, and P and K decreased.


2011 ◽  
Vol 159 (5) ◽  
pp. 1024-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miloš Zapletal ◽  
Pavel Cudlín ◽  
Petr Chroust ◽  
Otmar Urban ◽  
Radek Pokorný ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 743-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Jurán ◽  
M Edwards-Jonášová ◽  
P Cudlín ◽  
M Zapletal ◽  
L Šigut ◽  
...  

Forests ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 1427
Author(s):  
Chunju Cai ◽  
Zhihan Yang ◽  
Liang Liu ◽  
Yunsen Lai ◽  
Junjie Lei ◽  
...  

Nitrogen (N) deposition has been well documented to cause substantial impacts on ecosystem carbon cycling. However, the majority studies of stimulating N deposition by direct N addition to forest floor have neglected some key ecological processes in forest canopy (e.g., N retention and absorption) and might not fully represent realistic atmospheric N deposition and its effects on ecosystem carbon cycling. In this study, we stimulated both canopy and understory N deposition (50 and 100 kg N ha−1 year−1) with a local atmospheric NHx:NOy ratio of 2.08:1, aiming to assess whether canopy and understory N deposition had similar effects on soil respiration (RS) and net ecosystem production (NEP) in Moso bamboo forests. Results showed that RS, soil autotrophic (RA), and heterotrophic respiration (RH) were 2971 ± 597, 1472 ± 579, and 1499 ± 56 g CO2 m−2 year−1 for sites without N deposition (CN0), respectively. Canopy and understory N deposition did not significantly affect RS, RA, and RH, and the effects of canopy and understory N deposition on these soil fluxes were similar. NEP was 1940 ± 826 g CO2 m−2 year−1 for CN0, which was a carbon sink, indicating that Moso bamboo forest the potential to play an important role alleviating global climate change. Meanwhile, the effects of canopy and understory N deposition on NEP were similar. These findings did not support the previous predictions postulating that understory N deposition would overestimate the effects of N deposition on carbon cycling. However, due to the limitation of short duration of N deposition, an increase in the duration of N deposition manipulation is urgent and essential to enhance our understanding of the role of canopy processes in ecosystem carbon fluxes in the future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document