scholarly journals Placebo Controls: Now???

Author(s):  
Arnold I. Caplan
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (53) ◽  
pp. 1-52
Author(s):  
David J Beard ◽  
Marion K Campbell ◽  
Jane M Blazeby ◽  
Andrew J Carr ◽  
Charles Weijer ◽  
...  

Background The use of placebo comparisons for randomised trials assessing the efficacy of surgical interventions is increasingly being considered. However, a placebo control is a complex type of comparison group in the surgical setting and, although powerful, presents many challenges. Objectives To provide a summary of knowledge on placebo controls in surgical trials and to summarise any recommendations for designers, evaluators and funders of placebo-controlled surgical trials. Design To carry out a state-of-the-art workshop and produce a corresponding report involving key stakeholders throughout. Setting A workshop to discuss and summarise the existing knowledge and to develop the new guidelines. Results To assess what a placebo control entails and to assess the understanding of this tool in the context of surgery is considered, along with when placebo controls in surgery are acceptable (and when they are desirable). We have considered ethics arguments and regulatory requirements, how a placebo control should be designed, how to identify and mitigate risk for participants in these trials, and how such trials should be carried out and interpreted. The use of placebo controls is justified in randomised controlled trials of surgical interventions provided that there is a strong scientific and ethics rationale. Surgical placebos might be most appropriate when there is poor evidence for the efficacy of the procedure and a justified concern that results of a trial would be associated with a high risk of bias, particularly because of the placebo effect. Conclusions The use of placebo controls is justified in randomised controlled trials of surgical interventions provided that there is a strong scientific and ethics rationale. Feasibility work is recommended to optimise the design and implementation of randomised controlled trials. An outline for best practice was produced in the form of the Applying Surgical Placebo in Randomised Evaluations (ASPIRE) guidelines for those considering the use of a placebo control in a surgical randomised controlled trial. Limitations Although the workshop participants involved international members, the majority of participants were from the UK. Therefore, although every attempt was made to make the recommendations applicable to all health systems, the guidelines may, unconsciously, be particularly applicable to clinical practice in the UK NHS. Future work Future work should evaluate the use of the ASPIRE guidelines in making decisions about the use of a placebo-controlled surgical trial. In addition, further work is required on the appropriate nomenclature to adopt in this space. Funding Funded by the Medical Research Council UK and the National Institute for Health Research as part of the Medical Research Council–National Institute for Health Research Methodology Research programme.


2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (8S) ◽  
pp. 280-281
Author(s):  
Felipe Miguel Marticorena ◽  
Arthur Carvalho ◽  
Luana Farias de Oliveira ◽  
Eimear Dolan ◽  
Bruno Gualano ◽  
...  

BMJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
pp. i4728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Emsley ◽  
W Wolfgang Fleischhacker ◽  
Silvana Galderisi ◽  
Lisa J Halpern ◽  
Joseph P McEvoy ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 704-707
Author(s):  
E Ernst ◽  
J Filshie ◽  
Janet Hardy

Complementary medicine is fast becoming an integral part of palliative cancer care. There is considerable debate as to whether such treatments require proof of effectiveness through randomized clinical trials or whether it may suffice that patients adopt them with apparent appreciation. We attempt to raise some of the arguments on both sides. The arguments include the logistical problems of conducting research in palliative care, ethical problems of placebo controls, methodological difficulties of standardizing treatments or quantifying subtle effects and the, often considerable, costs of clinical trials. We feel that neither those who argue against nor those who argue in favour of rigorous clinical trials are entirely wrong or entirely right. However, our final verdict is that an absence of rigorous science will critically hinder progress. This, in turn, would be to the detriment of future patients. Through discussing the strengths and weaknesses of both sets of arguments, both sides might learn valuable lessons.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Tu ◽  
Zhiqiang Hu ◽  
Zhongbin Chen

Radiosurgery for glioblastoma is limited to the development of resistance, allowing tumor cells to survive and initiate tumor recurrence. Based on our previous work that coadministration of tissue factor and lipopolysaccharide following radiosurgery selectively induced thrombosis in cerebral arteriovenous malformations, achieving thrombosis of 69% of the capillaries and 39% of medium sized vessels, we hypothesized that a rapid and selective shutdown of the capillaries in glioblastoma vasculature would decrease the delivery of oxygen and nutrients, reducing tumor growth, preventing intracranial hypertension, and improving life expectancy. Glioblastoma was formed by implantation of GL261 cells into C57Bl/6 mouse brain. Mice were intravenously injected tissue factor, lipopolysaccharide, a combination of both, or placebo 24 hours after radiosurgery. Control mice received both agents after sham irradiation. Coadministration of tissue factor and lipopolysaccharide led to the formation of thrombi in up to 87 ± 8% of the capillaries and 46 ± 4% of medium sized vessels within glioblastoma. The survival rate of mice in this group was 80% versus no survivor in placebo controls 30 days after irradiation. Animal body weight increased with time in this group (r=0.88,P=0.0001). Thus, radiosurgery enhanced treatment with tissue factor, and lipopolysaccharide selectively induces thrombosis in glioblastoma vasculature, improving life expectancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document