scholarly journals Mental health impact of social capital interventions: a systematic review

2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine C. Flores ◽  
Daniela C. Fuhr ◽  
Angela M. Bayer ◽  
Andres G. Lescano ◽  
Nicki Thorogood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Social Capital ◽  
Health Impact

scholarly journals The mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, and interventions to help them: A rapid systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 293 ◽  
pp. 113441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Elizabeth Muller ◽  
Elisabet Vivianne Hafstad ◽  
Jan Peter William Himmels ◽  
Geir Smedslund ◽  
Signe Flottorp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Health Impact

scholarly journals The impact of leprosy on the mental wellbeing of leprosy-affected persons and their family members – a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
PMW Somar ◽  
MM Waltz ◽  
WH van Brakel
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Mental Wellbeing ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Leprosy has long-term consequences related to impairment and stigma. This includes a major impact on mental health. This study aims to consolidate current evidence regarding the mental health impact of leprosy on affected persons and their family members. In addition, determinants influencing mental health outcomes among leprosy-affected persons and effective interventions are examined. A keyword-based search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, Infolep and InfoNTD; additional literature was also considered. Articles presenting primary data involving leprosy-affected persons or their family members experiencing mental conditions were included. Independent extraction of articles was executed using predefined data fields. Articles were sorted according to relevance. In total, 65 studies were included in this systematic review. Multiple psychiatric morbidities have been identified among leprosy-affected persons, including depression, anxiety disorders and suicide (attempts). Additional factors were found that may impact mental health. Moreover, studies found that demographic factors, lifestyle and disease-specific factors and stigma and discrimination impact mental health. Depressive symptoms and low self-esteem were identified among children of leprosy-affected persons. In addition, interventions were identified that could improve the mental wellbeing of leprosy patients. Depressive disorders and anxiety disorders were found to be very common among persons affected by leprosy. Feelings such as fear, shame and low self-esteem are also experienced by those affected, and their children. Further research is necessary to ensure that mental health impact is included when determining the burden of disease for leprosy, and to relieve this burden.

scholarly journals COVID-19 pandemic: health impact of staying at home, social distancing and ‘lockdown’ measures—a systematic review of systematic reviews

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Chiesa ◽  
Gabriele Antony ◽  
Matthias Wismar ◽  
Bernd Rechel
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
Social Distancing ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Staying At Home ◽  
At Home

Abstract Background To systematically review the evidence published in systematic reviews (SR) on the health impact of staying at home, social distancing and lockdown measures. We followed a systematic review approach, in line with PRISMA guidelines. Methods In October 2020, we searched the databases Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase and Web of Science, using a pre-defined search strategy. Results The literature search yielded an initial list of 2172 records. After screening of titles and abstracts, followed by full-text screening, 51 articles were retained and included in the analysis. All of them referred to the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The direct health impact that was covered in the greatest number (25) of SR related to mental health, followed by 13 SR on healthcare delivery and 12 on infection control. The predominant areas of indirect health impacts covered by the included studies relate to the economic and social impacts. Only three articles mentioned the negative impact on education. Conclusions The focus of SR so far has been uneven, with mental health receiving the most attention. The impact of measures to contain the spread of the virus can be direct and indirect, having both intended and unintended consequences. Highlights

scholarly journals An evaluation of the mental health impact of SARS-CoV-2 on patients, general public and healthcare professionals: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 100806
Author(s):  
Peter Phiri ◽  
Rema Ramakrishnan ◽  
Shanaya Rathod ◽  
Kathryn Elliot ◽  
Tony Thayanandan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
General Public ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Health Impact

scholarly journals The Health Impact of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Hajat ◽  
E Stein ◽  
S Shantikumar ◽  
R Niaura ◽  
P Ferrara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Lung Function ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Hypertensive Patients ◽  
Increased Risk

AbstractIntroductionThe objective of this systematic review was to identify, report and critically appraise studies that have reported health outcomes from use of ENDS.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of all published literature on the health impact of ENDS products from 1st January 2015 until February 1, 2020, following the PRISMA protocol, including across the databases, PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Google Scholar. Medical subject headings were used in the execution of PubMed searches.A category for the level of evidence was assigned blindly using the Centres for Evidence Based Medicine framework. A similar approach was adopted to evaluate methodological quality of each study utilizing the National Institutes for Health (NIH) Quality Assessment Tools.ResultsThe database search identified 755 studies and a further 265 were identified from other sources and reference reviews of which 37 studies met the eligibility criteria.The majority of studies were of low strength for levels of evidence including 24 (65%) cross-sectional, 1(2.7%) case-control and six (16%) case studies. There were four (11%) cohort studies and only one (2.7%) RCT. There was only one (2.7%) meta-analysis or pooled study of observational study designs; there were no pooled results of randomized controlled trials. Of 37 studies, eight (22%) studies reported on benefits, two (2%) studies were neutral, reporting on both harm and benefits, the remaining 27 (73%) reported only on harms. The quality ratings were poor (20, 54%), fair (9, 24%) and good (8, 22%).In our review ENDS use has not been shown to be causative for any CVD outcomes and has been shown to be beneficial for hypertensive patients. Switching from cigarettes to e-cigarettes resulted in reduced exacerbations of COPD, with no evidence of long-term deterioration in lung function. There was a suggestion of short-term reductions in respiratory function in asthmatics, but no increased risk of asthma in ENDS users who were never smokers. Mental Health, cancer and mortality have not been adequately studied to form any consensus with regards to health outcomes from ENDS use.ConclusionOur review suggests that the majority of studies on the use of ENDS products reported on negative health impacts with few reporting on health outcomes from switching from cigarettes to e-cigarettes. The strength of evidence and quality of the published studies overall is poor.Our review has demonstrated that ENDS use is not causative for any harmful CVD outcomes and may be beneficial for hypertensive patients. Switching from cigarettes to e-cigarettes resulted in reduced exacerbations of COPD, with no evidence of increased risk of asthma, long-term respiratory harm or deterioration in lung function. Other health outcomes such as mental health, cancer and mortality have not been adequately studied to form a consensus. However, the findings of our review did not negate the consensus held by many that ENDS use is safer than the risks posed from smoking cigarettes.Overall, our review found the research on ENDS use is not yet adequate to provide quantitative estimates about health risks. Consequently, the current body of evidence is inadequate for informing policy around tobacco harm reduction.

scholarly journals Government response moderates the mental health impact of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of depression outcomes across countries

2021 ◽  
Vol 290 ◽  
pp. 364-377
Author(s):  
Yena Lee ◽  
Leanna M.W. Lui ◽  
David Chen-Li ◽  
Yuhua Liao ◽  
Rodrigo B. Mansur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Government Response

scholarly journals SOCIAL CAPITAL INTERVENTIONS TARGETING OLDER PEOPLE AND THEIR HEALTH IMPACT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 207-207
Author(s):  
L. Coll-Planas ◽  
F. Nyqvist ◽  
T. Puig ◽  
G. Urrútia ◽  
R. Monteserín
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Social Capital ◽  
Older People ◽  
Health Impact

scholarly journals The association between social capital and mental health and behavioural problems in children and adolescents: an integrative systematic review

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerri E McPherson ◽  
Susan Kerr ◽  
Elizabeth McGee ◽  
Antony Morgan ◽  
Francine M Cheater ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Social Capital ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Behavioural Problems

scholarly journals The mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, and interventions to help them: a rapid systematic review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Elizabeth Muller ◽  
Elisabet Vivianne Hafstad ◽  
Jan Peter William Himmels ◽  
Geir Smedslund ◽  
Signe Flottorp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Social Support ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Health Problems ◽  
Mental Health Outcomes ◽  
Sleeping Problems

Background: The covid-19 pandemic has heavily burdened, and in some cases overwhelmed, healthcare systems throughout the world. Healthcare workers are not only at heightened risk of infection, but also of adverse mental health outcomes. Identification of organizational, collegial and individual risk and resilience factors impacting the mental health of healthcare workers are needed to inform preparedness planning and sustainable response. Methods: We performed a rapid systematic review to identify, assess and summarize available research on the mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers. On 11 May 2020, we utilized the Norwegian Institute of Public Health's Live map of covid-19 evidence, the visualization of a database of 20,738 screened studies, to identify studies for inclusion. We included studies reporting on any type of mental health outcome in any type of healthcare workers during the pandemic. We described interventions reported by the studies, and narratively summarized mental health-related outcomes, as study heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. We assessed study quality using design-specific instruments. Results: We included 59 studies, reporting on a total of 54,707 healthcare workers. The prevalence of general psychological distress across the studies ranged from 7-97% (median 37%), anxiety 9-90% (median 24%), depression 5-51% (median 21%), and sleeping problems 34-65% (median 37%). Seven studies reported on implementing mental health interventions, and most focused on individual symptom reduction, but none reported on effects of the interventions. In most studies, healthcare workers reported low interest in and use of professional help, and greater reliance on social support and contact with family and friends. Exposure to covid-19 was the most commonly reported correlate of mental health problems, followed by female gender, and worry about infection or about infecting others. Social support correlated with less mental health problems. Discussion: Healthcare workers in a variety of fields, positions, and exposure risks are reporting anxiety, depression, sleep problems, and distress during the covid-19 pandemic, but most studies do not report comparative data on mental health symptoms. before the pandemic. There seems to be a mismatch between risk factors for adverse mental health outcomes among healthcare workers in the current pandemic and their needs and preferences, and the individual psychopathology focus of current interventions. Efforts to help healthcare workers sustain healthy relationships to colleagues, family and friends over time may be paramount to safeguard what is already an important source of support during the prolonged crisis. Expanding interventions' focus to incorporate organizational, collegial and family factors to support healthcare workers responding to the pandemic could improve acceptability and efficacy of interventions. Other: The protocol for this review is available online. No funding was received.

scholarly journals Mental Health Impact of COVID-19 among Children and College Students: A Systematic Review

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jad A. Elharake ◽  
Faris Akbar ◽  
Amyn A. Malik ◽  
Walter Gilliam ◽  
Saad B. Omer
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
College Students ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Impact
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document