scholarly journals Prevalence and self-reported reasons of cannabis use for medical purposes in USA and Canada

Author(s):  
Janni Leung ◽  
Gary Chan ◽  
Daniel Stjepanović ◽  
Jack Yiu Chak Chung ◽  
Wayne Hall ◽  
...  

Abstract Rationale There has been increasing attention on cannabis use for medical purposes, but there is currently a lack of data on its epidemiology. Objectives To examine the epidemiology of self-reported cannabis use for medical purposes by (1) estimating its prevalence, (2) comparing gender and age differences, and (3) investigating what reasons they were used to manage. Methods Participants included 27,169 respondents (aged 16–65) who completed Wave 1 of The International Cannabis Policy Study (ICPS) conducted across Canada and the USA in 2018 via online surveys. Cannabis policy conditions were “US legal–recreational” (legal for both recreational and medical uses), “US legal–medical only”, “US illegal”, and “Canada–medical only”. Results The overall prevalence of self-reported ever cannabis use for medical purposes was 27%, with similar rates by sex and the highest prevalence in young adults. Prevalence was higher in US legal–recreational states (34%) than US illegal states (23%), US legal–medical only states (25%), and Canada (25%). The most common physical health reasons include use to manage pain (53%), sleep (46%), headaches/migraines (35%), appetite (22%), and nausea/vomiting (21%). For mental health reasons, the most common were for anxiety (52%), depression (40%), and PTSD/trauma (17%). There were 11% who reported using cannabis for managing other drug or alcohol use and 4% for psychosis. Conclusions A substantial proportion of the North American population self-reported cannabis use for medical purposes for a variety of medical reasons, including those living in jurisdictions without legal markets. Further research is needed to understand the safety and efficacy of these forms of medical cannabis use.

1983 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 381-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Dickinson ◽  
T. Sebastien ◽  
L. Taylor

Children in the age range 8 to 13 years (72 males and 53 females), completed a game preference questionnaire and participated in a novel competitive game task, both the questionnaire and method of approach to the game could be evaluated in order to classify subjects as potents, fortunists, strategists, or potent-strategists in terms of competitive style. Predictions were made on the basis of studies within and between cultures concerning gender differences in competitive style. Based on evidence from within the North American culture, predictions were made concerning game preference and age differences. The results supported the predictions in terms of gender differences. Changes in game preference with age and gender, and age differences in competitive-style also conformed with predictions. It is considered that the novel competitive game task might make a useful instrument for evaluating competitive style.


2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. A556.3-A557
Author(s):  
S Pesic Gilanji ◽  
S Turudic ◽  
J Odovic Cubrilo ◽  
N Stankovic

1996 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mats Fredrikson ◽  
Peter Annas ◽  
HÅkan Fischer ◽  
Gustav Wik

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Yeon Ha ◽  
Belong Cho ◽  
Misoon Song ◽  
Jaeyoung Lim ◽  
Ga Hye Kim ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 263-278
Author(s):  
Betty Ragnarsdottir ◽  
Dagmar Kr. Hannesdottir ◽  
Freyr Halldorsson ◽  
Urdur Njardvik

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 124027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Hayashi ◽  
Azusa Oita ◽  
Luis Lassaletta ◽  
Junko Shindo ◽  
Hideaki Shibata ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie A. Gravener ◽  
Alissa A. Haedt ◽  
Todd F. Heatherton ◽  
Pamela K. Keel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document