The effect of carbon steel-wool in removal of arsenic from drinking water

2002 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Campos
2005 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 926-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Campos ◽  
P. M. Büchler
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 645-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesar Calderon Mólgora ◽  
Alejandra Martín Domínguez ◽  
Eloy Mundo Avila ◽  
Patrick Drogui ◽  
Gerardo Buelna

Processes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raoul Tepong-Tsindé ◽  
Arnaud Igor Ndé-Tchoupé ◽  
Chicgoua Noubactep ◽  
Achille Nassi ◽  
Hans Ruppert

This study characterizes the decrease of the hydraulic conductivity (permeability loss) of a metallic iron-based household water filter (Fe0 filter) for a duration of 12 months. A commercial steel wool (SW) is used as Fe0 source. The Fe0 unit containing 300 g of SW was sandwiched between two conventional biological sand filters (BSFs). The working solution was slightly turbid natural well water polluted with pathogens (total coliform = 1950 UFC mL−1) and contaminated with nitrate ([NO3−] = 24.0 mg L−1). The system was monitored twice per month for pH value, removal of nitrate, coliforms, and turbidity, the iron concentration, as well as the permeability loss. Results revealed a quantitative removal of coliform (>99%), nitrate (>99%) and turbidity (>96%). The whole column effluent depicted drinking water quality. The permeability loss after one year of operation was about 40%, and the filter was still producing 200 L of drinking water per day at a flow velocity of 12.5 L h−1. A progressive increase of the effluent pH value was also recorded from about 5.0 (influent) to 8.4 at the end of the experiment. The effluent iron concentration was constantly lower than 0.2 mg L−1, which is within the drinking-water quality standards. This study presents an affordable design that can be one-to-one translated into the real world to accelerate the achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals for safe drinking water.


2008 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 889-895
Author(s):  
Farida Sagitova ◽  
Dorin Bejan ◽  
Nigel J. Bunce ◽  
Ron Miziolek

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biplob Kumar Pramanik ◽  
Sagor Kumar Pramanik ◽  
Fatihah Suja

Effects of biological activated carbon (BAC), biological aerated filter (BAF), alum coagulation and Moringa oleifera coagulation were investigated to remove iron and arsenic contaminants from drinking water. At an initial dose of 5 mg/L, the removal efficiency for arsenic and iron was 63% and 58% respectively using alum, and 47% and 41% respectively using Moringa oleifera. The removal of both contaminants increased with the increase in coagulant dose and decrease in pH. Biological processes were more effective in removing these contaminants than coagulation. Compared to BAF, BAC gave greater removal of both arsenic and iron, removing 85% and 74%, respectively. Longer contact time for both processes could reduce the greater concentration of arsenic and iron contaminants. The addition of coagulation (at 5 mg/L dosage) and a biological process (with 15 or 60 min contact time) could significantly increase removal efficiency, and the maximum removal was observed for the combination of alum and BAC treatment (60 min contact time), with 100% and 98.56% for arsenic and iron respectively. The reduction efficiency of arsenic and iron reduced with the increase in the concentration of dissolved organics in the feedwater due to the adsorption competition between organic molecules and heavy metals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document