scholarly journals Patient satisfaction following carpal-tunnel decompression: a comparison of patients with and without osteoarthritis of the wrist

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Joshy ◽  
B. Thomas ◽  
S. Ghosh ◽  
S. G. Haidar ◽  
S. C. Deshmukh
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Osteoarthritis Of The Wrist

scholarly journals Efficacy of ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block versus forearm intravenous regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled trial

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0246863
Author(s):  
Hassanin Jalil ◽  
Florence Polfliet ◽  
Kristof Nijs ◽  
Liesbeth Bruckers ◽  
Gerrit De Wachter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Regional Anaesthesia ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Surgical Time ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia

Background and objectives Distal upper extremity surgery is commonly performed under regional anaesthesia, including intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA) and ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block. This study aimed to investigate if ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block is superior to forearm IVRA in producing a surgical block in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release. Methods In this observer-blinded, randomized controlled superiority trial, 100 patients undergoing carpal tunnel release were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block (n = 50) or forearm IVRA (n = 50). The primary outcome was anaesthetic efficacy evaluated by classifying the blocks as complete vs incomplete. Complete anaesthesia was defined as total sensory block, incomplete anaesthesia as mild pain requiring more analgesics or need of general anaesthesia. Pain intensity on a numeric rating scale (0–10) was recorded. Surgeon satisfaction with hemostasis, surgical time, and OR stay time were recorded. Patient satisfaction with the quality of the block was assessed at POD 1. Results In total, 43 (86%) of the forearm nerve blocks were evaluated as complete, compared to 33 (66%) of the forearm IVRA (p = 0.019). After the forearm nerve block, pain intensity was lower at discharge (-1.76 points lower, 95% CI (-2.92, -0.59), p = 0.0006) compared to patients treated with forearm IVRA. No differences in pain experienced at the start of the surgery, during surgery, and at POD1, nor in surgical time or total OR stay were observed between groups. Surgeon (p = 0.0016) and patient satisfaction (p = 0.0023) were slightly higher after forearm nerve block. Conclusion An ultrasound-guided forearm nerve block is superior compared to forearm IVRA in providing a surgical block in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release. Trial registration This trial was registered as NCT03411551.

Are Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Regional Degenerative Osteoarthritis Linked? Results of a Case-Control Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (01) ◽  
pp. 41-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Bacle ◽  
Emilie Marteau ◽  
Philippe Corcia ◽  
Pascal Garaud ◽  
Jacky Laulan
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Causal Relation ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Degenerative Osteoarthritis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Osteoarthritis Of The Wrist ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Control Study

Background: Causality has not been formally demonstrated between carpal tunnel syndrome and osteoarthritis of the wrist or at the base of the thumb. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between carpal tunnel syndrome and concomitant degenerative osteoarthritis of the wrist or basal thumb joint. We hypothesised that wrist osteoarthritis by reducing the free volume of the carpal tunnel would be associated with carpal tunnel syndrome, while basal thumb osteoarthritis would show no direct correlation with carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: A case-control study including 95 cases and 99 control subjects, has been carried out. Sixty-eight per group were matched for age and sex. Posterior-anterior and lateral plain wrist radiographs for the two matched groups were analysed. Results: Except for scaphotrapeziotrapezoid location, degenerative osteoarthritis of the wrist was significantly linked with carpal tunnel syndrome, whereas there was no significant difference between case and control groups for prevalence of basal osteoarthritis of the thumb. Conclusions: These results suggest that basal osteoarthritis of the thumb is not a causal factor in carpal tunnel syndrome. In contrast, degenerative osteoarthritis of the wrist was strongly associated with carpal tunnel syndrome, suggesting a causal relation.

The Results of Carpal Tunnel Release: Open Versus Endoscopic Technique

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. BANDE ◽  
L. DE SMET ◽  
G. FABRY
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Endoscopic Technique ◽  
Open Release ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Open Versus ◽  
Portal Technique

We retrospectively compared two similar groups of patients who underwent either endoscopic decompression of the carpal tunnel (single portal technique, 44 patients) or open decompression (58 patients) during 1 year in our department. To find out whether there was any subjective difference between the results of the two techniques, we sent each patient a questionnaire and received a 95% response. No major complications occurred. Three endoscopic decompressions had to be abandoned, and open release was performed. We could not demonstrate any significant difference in relief of symptoms and return to work between the two groups. Patient satisfaction at 6 to 18 months follow-up was high with both techniques.

Patient Satisfaction After Open Carpal Tunnel Release Correlates With Depression

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santiago A. Lozano Calderón ◽  
Alex Paiva ◽  
David Ring
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Open Carpal Tunnel Release

Interpretation of the QuickDASH score after open carpal tunnel decompression: threshold values associated with patient satisfaction

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 624-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. D. Clement ◽  
A. D. Duckworth ◽  
P. J. Jenkins ◽  
J. E. McEachan
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Observational Cohort Study ◽  
Baseline Score ◽  
Threshold Values ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Observational Cohort

We studied the correlation between change in the QuickDASH score and the absolute post-operative QuickDASH score with patient satisfaction after open carpal tunnel decompression. Threshold values in the QuickDASH score, the point at which the sensitivity and specificity are maximal in predicting patient satisfaction, were identified. During the study period, outcome data were compiled for 937 carpal tunnel decompressions, which included 219 (23%) male and 718 (77%) female patients with a mean age of 58 years (standard deviation (SD) 14). There was a significant improvement (mean difference 32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 30 to 34) in the QuickDASH from a mean of 54 (SD 20) to 22 (SD 23) at 1 year after surgery. There were 808 (86%) patients who defined their outcome as satisfactory at 1 year. The identified threshold values for the post-operative QuickDASH score (⩽34 points) and the change (⩾20 points) in the score were highly predictive of patient satisfaction. However, these threshold values varied significantly according to the baseline pre-operative score. The threshold values identified in the QuickDASH can be used to interpret the score. However, the influence of the pre-operative baseline score should be taken into account when comparing different cohorts of patients or using the values to power future studies. Level of Evidence IV: Prognosis, observational cohort study

scholarly journals Is one-stop surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome safe? A retrospective long-term follow-up study in a neurosurgical unit in Copenhagen

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. e016103
Author(s):  
Louise Møller Jørgensen ◽  
Karin Piil ◽  
Asma Bashir ◽  
Morten Bo Larsen ◽  
Pamela Santiago Poggenborg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Symptom Relief ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
One Stop ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate one-stop surgery (OSS) for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) regarding symptom relief and patient satisfaction. OSS in our setting means only one visit to the hospital for surgery and no hospital appointments for preassessment or follow-up. We hypothesised that relief of symptoms with OSS is comparable with that in non-OSS patients reported in the literature.DesignThis is a long-term retrospective follow-up study (56.5 months) of 1003 patients referred for CTS and discharged with or without surgery from an OSS clinic. Of the original cohort, 671 patients completed the long-term follow-up telephone interview.ResultsTwo-thirds of the patients were free of even minor symptoms following surgery. The symptom relief and patient satisfaction in this study were comparable with results in non-OSS patients reported in the literature.ConclusionThe implementation of a clinical pathway and OSS for the management of CTS was safe with good long-term symptom relief and high patient satisfaction.

Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes between Two Different Techniques of Carpal Tunnel Release: Classical Incision versus Minimal Incision

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sajad Heidari ◽  
Alireza Taabbod ◽  
Mahmoud Farzan ◽  
Sadegh Saberi ◽  
Mitra Ashrafi
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Symptom Relief ◽  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
Minimal Incision ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
One Year

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common compression neuropathy in the upper limb which needs surgery in many cases. Two common surgical incisions for carpal tunnel release (CTR) are classical incision and minimal incision. In this survey, the aim is to compare patient-reported outcomes of these two types of incisions. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients with CTS who underwent two different approaches for CTR (classical or minimal) during one year were included. The diagnosis was confirmed clinically and by electrodiagnostic studies. The patients were categorized into two groups regarding the type of surgery. At the 12-month visit, the patients were assessed for functional outcome, level of the pain, and satisfaction with Quick Disability of Arm, Hand and Shoulder score (QuickDASH), the visual analogue score (VAS) scale, and the scar appearance and symptom relief, respectively. Results: 39 patients were entered in this study, 3 of who had bilateral symptoms. The 42 operated hands were divided into two groups: classical incision group (n = 21) and minimal incision group (n = 21). No significant difference was discovered between the two groups considering age and sex. In addition, no significant difference was found in the variables evaluated between the two groups, except for the higher patient satisfaction with the scar appearance in minimal incision group after 12 months. Conclusion: After a one-year period, the minimal incision procedure had no priority to classical incision procedure, except for higher patient satisfaction considering the scar appearance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document