scholarly journals A randomized, single-blind, single-dose study evaluating the pharmacokinetic equivalence of proposed biosimilar ABP 980 and trastuzumab in healthy male subjects

2017 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 881-888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Hanes ◽  
Vincent Chow ◽  
Nan Zhang ◽  
Richard Markus
Cephalalgia ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 532-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
RL Kunka ◽  
EK Hussey ◽  
S Shaw ◽  
P Warner ◽  
B Aubert ◽  
...  

A suppository formulation of file 5HT1 agonist sumatriptan could prove an important therapeutic option in migraine patients who dislike or poorly tolerate injectable therapy and where oral tablet administration is unsuitable because of severe migraine-related vomiting. Two independent double-blind, randomized clinical studies were conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan suppositories following ascending single dose. (four different dose levels) and multiple doses. In the four-period, crossover, single-dose study, 24 healthy male subjects were randomized to receive a suppository containing 12.5, 25, 50, or 100 mg on separate occasions 3–14 days apart. The suppositories were generally well tolerated; transient asthenia, drowsiness, and headache were the most frequently reported adverse events, and these were not close-related. Peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) of sumatriptan were proportional to close from 25 to 100 mg; area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCx) values were proportional to dose except at the highest doses, when they were greater than those predicted from lower doses. For all doses, the tmax of sumatriptan occurred within 2.5h, and the t1/2 was approximately 2h. In the two-period, placebo-controlled, crossover, repeat-dose study, 12 healthy adult male subjects were randomized to receive either a 50-mg sumatriptan suppository or placebo suppository, administered rectally twice a day, for 11 doses (5 1/2 days). Adverse events were no more frequent with sumatriptan than with placebo, and stool guaiac, rectal examinations, and physical examinations remained normal. No significant differences were noted between Day 1 and Day 6 values in the AUC, Cmax, time of peak serum concentration (tmax), elimination half-life (t1/2), fraction of the dose excreted in the urine (fe), or renal clearance (Clr) of sumatriptan or its pharmacologically inactive indole acetic acid metabolite. Serum metabolite concentrations were two to threefold higher than corresponding sumatriptan concentrations. No clinically significant accumulation of sumatriptan or its metabolite occurred. Overall, these studies show that sumatriptan administration via a suppository formulation is well tolerated, allows rapid absorption of sumatriptan, results in sumatriptan Cmax values that are proportion I to dose from 25 to 100 mg, and is not associated with accumulation of sumatriptan or its nnetabolite.


2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 555-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-nan Liu ◽  
Jie Huang ◽  
Can Guo ◽  
Shuang Yang ◽  
Ling Ye ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose This is the first study to compare the pharmacokinetics of QL1101, a proposed bevacizumab biosimilar, with Avastin® sourced from Roche Diagnostics GmbH. Methods In this double-blind, single-dose, parallel-group study, healthy male subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive QL1101 or Avastin® 3 mg/kg intravenously. Pharmacokinetic assessments were conducted for 85 days, with additional safety and immunogenicity assessments until day 90. Primary study endpoints were area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC0–∞), AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0–last), and maximum serum concentration (Cmax). Pharmacokinetic equivalence was shown if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of the C0–max, AUC0–last, and AUC0–∞ were within the predefined bioequivalence margin of 80–125.00%. Results A total of 82 subjects were randomized to the following groups: 42 to QL1101 and 40 to Avastin®. The 90% CIs of the GMRs of AUC0–∞, AUC0–last, and Cmax of QL1101 and Avastin® were (97.8%, 107.0%), (94.5%, 106.9%), and (94.1%, 107.3%), respectively, which were all within the bioequivalence margin. The incidence of adverse events was 90.5% and 95.0% in the QL1101 and Avastin® groups, respectively. Mean serum concentration–time profiles, secondary pharmacokinetic parameters, and safety and immunogenicity profiles were comparable across the two treatment groups. Conclusions The study demonstrated the pharmacokinetic equivalence of QL1101 to Avastin®. QL1101 (3 mg/kg, iv) is safe and tolerable in healthy Chinese subjects. These data support the further clinical evaluation of QL1101 as a bevacizumab biosimilar.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Huang ◽  
Linling Que ◽  
Ying Ding ◽  
Nannan Chu ◽  
Zhenzhong Qian ◽  
...  

Objective: This study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity of HOT-1010 with bevacizumab (Avastin®) in Chinese healthy male subjects.Methods: A single-center, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, parallel trial was performed in 84 Chinese healthy male subjects who randomly (1:1) received a single intravenous infusion of 1 mg/kg HOT-1010 or Avastin® for 90 min and followed up for 85 days. Serum concentrations of bevacizumab were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Primary pharmacokinetic parameters, Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞, were calculated and evaluated the bioequivalence between HOT-1010 and Avastin®, the safety and immunogenicity of investigational drugs were also assessed.Results: A total of 82 subjects completed the study. The 90% Confidence Intervals for geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were 91.81–103.64%, 85.19–95.39% and 85.04–95.36%, which were all within the bioequivalence margin. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 27 (65.9%) subjects in HOT-1010 group and 23 (56.1%) subjects in Avastin® group. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate. No TEAEs, Serious Adverse Events or deaths leading to discontinuation was reported. Subjects were all tested negative for Anti-drug Antibody.Conclusion: HOT-1010 exhibited the similar pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity profiles of bevacizumab (Avastin®) in Chinese healthy male subjects.Clinical Trial Registration:http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html, CTR20181610.


2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (06) ◽  
pp. 839-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Zhu ◽  
Xue-Mei Wang ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
Xiao-Ye Li ◽  
Bao-Xiu Wang

Rhubarb is a common herb used in traditional Chinese medicine. However, few publications exist about its pharmacokinetic profiles in animals or healthy volunteers. Whether retention enema administration of rhubarb extract affects its pharmacokinetics as well as its tolerability is unknown. Therefore, we set out to compare the pharmacokinetic parameters of rhein administered by retention enemas with those of conventional oral dosing of rhubarb extract. Eight healthy male volunteers were enrolled in a prospective crossover study. All subjects received a single dose of rhubarb extract (50 mg·kg-1) on two separate occasions, once orally, once by a retention enema. Rhein plasma concentration was measured by HPLC. The C max , AUC 0-∞, AUMC were significantly higher in oral administration than those in retention enema administration ( p < 0.05), while V d of rhein after oral administration of rhubarb extract was significantly lower ( p < 0.05) than that after retention enema administration. However, no statistically significant differences between the two treatments were observed for any of the other pharmacokinetic parameters ( T max , t 1/2, MRT 0-∞, CL ). Dosage adjustment is advisable for retention enema administration of rhubarb extract in patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document