Differentiation of supratentorial single brain metastasis and glioblastoma by using peri-enhancing oedema region–derived radiomic features and multiple classifiers

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 3015-3022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Dong ◽  
Qian Li ◽  
Biao Jiang ◽  
Xiuliang Zhu ◽  
Qiang Zeng ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 105 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 238-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albertus T. C. J. van Eck ◽  
Gerhard A. Horstmann

✓The occurrence of brain metastases from a malignant schwannoma of the penis is extremely rare. In patients with a single brain metastasis, microsurgical extirpation is the treatment of choice and verifies the diagnosis. In cases of multiple or recurrent metastases, radiosurgery is an effective and safe therapy option. Gamma Knife surgery was performed in a patient who had previously undergone tumor resection and who presented with recurrence of the lesion and three de novo brain metastases. This first report on brain metastasis from a malignant penile schwannoma illustrates the efficacy and safety of radiosurgical treatment for these tumors.


JAMA ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 280 (17) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arlan Pinzer Mintz ◽  
J. Gregory Cairncross

2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack P. Rock ◽  
Stephen Haines ◽  
Lawrence Recht ◽  
Mark Bernstein ◽  
Raymond Sawaya ◽  
...  

Object In January 1998 the Guidelines and Outcomes Committee of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) issued a charge for the development of evidence-based practice parameters focusing on the treatment of patients with single metastasis to the brain. The charge was imposed in response to the significant controversy surrounding questions relating to the optimal management strategies for patients with single brain metastasis. Methods A team consisting of physicians from the AANS, the American Academy of Neurology, and the American Association of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology convened and the literature was reviewed. Methodically drawing from the best of Class I, II, and III levels of available evidence, authors sought to determine how the literature addressed and disposed of the question of the optimal management for an adult with a known history of cancer and a single meta-static brain lesion. Framing the question in this specific manner allowed researchers to focus directly on treatment issues, without having to consider diagnostic issues. Conclusions The results of the evidence-based analysis demonstrated that there was insufficient information to establish standards of care. Data from the literature does, however, support a guideline stating that surgical resection accompanied by whole brain radiation therapy is associated with the best survival rate. Additional lower-quality evidence supports an option for management with radiosurgery.


2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 356-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karoline Skogen ◽  
Anselm Schulz ◽  
Eirik Helseth ◽  
Balaji Ganeshan ◽  
Johann Baptist Dormagen ◽  
...  

Background Texture analysis has been done on several radiological modalities to stage, differentiate, and predict prognosis in many oncologic tumors. Purpose To determine the diagnostic accuracy of discriminating glioblastoma (GBM) from single brain metastasis (MET) by assessing the heterogeneity of both the solid tumor and the peritumoral edema with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) texture analysis (MRTA). Material and Methods Preoperative MRI examinations done on a 3-T scanner of 43 patients were included: 22 GBM and 21 MET. MRTA was performed on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in a representative region of interest (ROI). The MRTA was assessed using a commercially available research software program (TexRAD) which applies a filtration histogram technique for characterizing tumor and peritumoral heterogeneity. The filtration step selectively filters and extracts texture features at different anatomical scales varying from 2 mm (fine) to 6 mm (coarse). Heterogeneity quantification was obtained by the statistical parameter entropy. A threshold value to differentiate GBM from MET with sensitivity and specificity was calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results Quantifying the heterogeneity of the solid part of the tumor showed no significant difference between GBM and MET. However, the heterogeneity of the GBMs peritumoral edema was significantly higher than the edema surrounding MET, differentiating them with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 90%. Conclusion Assessing the peritumoral heterogeneity can increase the radiological diagnostic accuracy when discriminating GBM and MET. This will facilitate the medical staging and optimize the planning for surgical resection of the tumor and postoperative management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document