scholarly journals Bilobar spreading of colorectal liver metastases does not significantly affect survival after R0 resection in the era of interdisciplinary multimodal treatment

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 1359-1367 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Homayounfar ◽  
A. Bleckmann ◽  
L. C. Conradi ◽  
T. Sprenger ◽  
T. Beissbarth ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Elias ◽  
Lucas Sideris ◽  
Marc Pocard ◽  
Jean-Francois Ouellet ◽  
Val�rie Boige ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. e193-e194
Author(s):  
M.C. Marques ◽  
A.L. Diniz ◽  
H.S.C. Ribeiro ◽  
W.L. Costa ◽  
A.L. Godoy ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Felipe José Fernandez COIMBRA ◽  
Heber Salvador de Castro RIBEIRO ◽  
Márcio Carmona MARQUES ◽  
Paulo HERMAN ◽  
Rubens CHOJNIAK ◽  
...  

Background : Liver metastases of colorectal cancer are frequent and potentially fatal event in the evolution of patients with these tumors. Aim : In this module, was contextualized the clinical situations and parameterized epidemiological data and results of the various treatment modalities established. Method: Was realized deep discussion on detecting and staging metastatic colorectal cancer, as well as employment of imaging methods in the evaluation of response to instituted systemic therapy. Results : The next step was based on the definition of which patients would have their metastases considered resectable and how to expand the amount of patients elegible for modalities with curative intent. Conclusion : Were presented clinical, pathological and molecular prognostic factors, validated to be taken into account in clinical practice.


2019 ◽  
Vol 120 (7) ◽  
pp. 675-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moritz J. Strowitzki ◽  
Praveen Radhakrishnan ◽  
Sandra Pavicevic ◽  
Jana Scheer ◽  
Gwendolyn Kimmer ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 395 (6) ◽  
pp. 633-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kia Homayounfar ◽  
Torsten Liersch ◽  
Martin Niessner ◽  
Johannes Meller ◽  
Thomas Lorf ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Felipe José Fernandez COIMBRA ◽  
Heber Salvador de Castro RIBEIRO ◽  
Orlando Jorge Martins TORRES

Author(s):  
Orlando Jorge Martins TORRES ◽  
Márcio Carmona MARQUES ◽  
Fabio Nasser SANTOS ◽  
Igor Correia de FARIAS ◽  
Anelisa Kruschewsky COUTINHO ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT In the last module of this consensus, controversial topics were discussed. Management of the disease after progression during first line chemotherapy was the first discussion. Next, the benefits of liver resection in the presence of extra-hepatic disease were debated, as soon as, the best sequence of treatment. Conversion chemotherapy in the presence of unresectable liver disease was also discussed in this module. Lastly, the approach to the unresectable disease was also discussed, focusing in the best chemotherapy regimens and hole of chemo-embolization.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 435-435
Author(s):  
Kozo Kataoka ◽  
Akiyoshi Kanazawa ◽  
Shigeyoshi Iwamoto ◽  
Yasuhiro Miyake ◽  
Takeshi Kato ◽  
...  

435 Background: Recently, liver resection becomes possible by intensive chemotherapy, i.e. conversion chemotherapy, in patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM). But the criteria for non-resectability varies one team to another, and there are few reports about the clinical benefit of conversion chemotherapy followed by liver resection. Methods: Our criteria for resectability of CLM depends on the size of remnant liver volume (>30%) and expected function after the removal of all metastases, regardress of number and size of CLM. From December 2007 to September 2011, 113 patients were diagnosed as CLM without extra-hepatic metastases and received chemotherapy. 47 patients were initially diagnosed as resectable and received hepatic resection after chemotherapy (resected group). 66 patients were initially diagnosed as unresectable, but 11 patients become resectable after chemotherapy (conversion group) and 55 patients remain unresectable in spite of chemotherapy (unresecetd group). We assessed the survival benefit between these 3 groups, retrospectively. Results: 110 patients received oxaliplatin-based regimen and 3 irrinotecan-based regimen. In coversion group, 8 patients received cetuximab containing regimen and 2 received bevacizumab containing regimen. 46 of 47 patients in resected group received R0 resection and 7 of 11 patients in conversion group. No serious postoperative complications were observed in resected and conversion group, but the incidence of a surgical site infection in conversion group was somewhat higher than in resected group. Median disease-free survival was significantly higher in the resected group than conversion group (16.73 months [95% CI: 7.80~25.47] and 3.83 months [95% CI: 0.35~7.31 months]) (P=0.031). And median overall survival (OS) was also higher in resected group, but not significant. In resected and conversion group, median OS was significantly higher than in unresected group. (52.20 vs 39.37 vs 20.57 months (p <0.001)). Conclusions: The recurrence rate was higher in coversion group, but conversion chemotherapy followed by hepatic resection seems to be promising and feasible strategy in initially unresectable CLM patients.


2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 1939-1946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Tsim ◽  
Andrew J. Healey ◽  
Adam E. Frampton ◽  
Nagy A. Habib ◽  
Devinder S. Bansi ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15029-e15029
Author(s):  
Christine Koch ◽  
Niklas Schmidt ◽  
Ria Winkelmann ◽  
Katrin Eichler ◽  
Martin-Leo Hansmann ◽  
...  

e15029 Background: Initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases can become resectable after chemotherapy. Chemotherapy combined with EGF-receptor antibodies has shown consistent high response rates in patients with RAS wildtype tumors. However, the influence of RAS mutations other than exon 2 mutations in the context of a conversion strategy has not been systematically studied yet. Methods: Out of a cohort of 424 patients with mCRC, we identified 30 patients with initially unresectable KRAS exon 2 wildtype colorectal liver metastases who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy including cetuximab or panitumumab between January 2008 and February 2014. In all patients extended RAS analysis (KRAS and NRAS exon 3 codon 59 and 61 and exon 4 codon 117 and 146) was carried out. Resection status (R0, R1 or R2), PFS and OS were recorded in all patients and maximum tumor shrinkage was calculated. Results: RAS mutation analysis identified further KRAS mutations in 4/30 patients (13.3%). No NRAS mutations were found. In none of these four patients a R0 resection could be achieved. In contrast, 15/26 (57.7%) RAS wildtype patients could be R0 resected. Median survival of patients with a RAS wildtype tumor was 64.0 [range: 7.4-98.6] months vs. 28.0 [range: 16.4- 40.6] months in those with a RAS mutation (hazard ratio, HR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.15-1.81, p = 0.3). Median PFS in patients with a RAS mutation was 8 [range: 6-28.8] months compared to 10.4 [range, 1.7-15.2] months in patients with a RAS wildtype cancer. Median overall survival was > 63.3 months in R0-resected patients vs. 30.0 months in those with a R1 or R2 resection (HR 0.23; [95% CI 0.10- 0.75; p = 0.008). Conclusions: Our data suggest that a RAS wildtype status and a R0 resection are the strongest predictors for overall survival. The extended RAS analysis allows a better patient selection for anti-EGFRbased conversion chemotherapy before secondary resection of colorectal liver metastases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document