scholarly journals The importance of clinically relevant background therapy in cardioprotective studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 115 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenhe He ◽  
Sean M. Davidson ◽  
Derek M. Yellon

AbstractTreatment of acute myocardial infarct patients (AMI) includes rapid restoration of coronary blood flow and pharmacological therapy aimed to prevent pain and maintain vessel patency. Many interventions have been investigated to offer additional protection. One such intervention is remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) involving short-episodes of ischaemia of the arm with a blood pressure cuff, followed by reperfusion to protect the heart organs from subsequent severe ischaemia. However, the recent CONDI2-ERIC-PPCI multicentre study of RIC in STEMI showed no benefit in clinical outcome in low risk patients. It could also be argued that these patients were already in a partially protected state, highlighting the disconnect between animal- and clinical-based outcome studies. To improve potential translatability, we developed an animal model using pharmacological agents similar to those given to patients presenting with an AMI, prior to PPCI. Rats underwent MI on a combined background of an opioid agonist, heparin and a platelet-inhibitor thereby allowing us to assess whether additional cardioprotective strategies had any effect over and above this “cocktail”. We demonstrated that the “background drugs” were protective in their own right, reducing MI from 57.5 ± 3.7% to 37.3 ± 2.9% (n = 11, p < 0.001). On this background of drugs, RIC did not add any further protection (38.0 ± 3.4%). However, using a caspase inhibitor, which acts via a different mechanistic pathway to RIC, we were able to demonstrate additional protection (20.6 ± 3.3%). This concept provides initial evidence to develop models which can be used to evaluate future animal-to-clinical translation in cardioprotective studies.

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Genya Sunagawa ◽  
Keita Saku ◽  
Takuya Nishikawa ◽  
Nobuhiro Suematsu ◽  
Toru Kubota ◽  
...  

Introduction: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) supports hemodynamics in cardiogenic shock (CS) at the expense of left ventricular (LV) overload. LV assist device (LVAD) also supports hemodynamics, whereas LVAD unloads LV. Therefore, the combination of ECMO and LVAD would augment hemodynamic support and unload LV. We hypothesized that the combination therapy in acute myocardial infarct (AMI) in CS could synergistically improve hemodynamics and unload LV, which, in turn, reduces infarct size. Methods: In protocol 1, we ligated coronary arteries and created AMI with CS in 5 mongrel dogs (15.1±0.3 kg). We transvascularly introduced Impella CP into LV. We kept the ECMO flow constant at 1.8L/min. We compared hemodynamics and the LV pressure-volume area (PVA, an index of LV oxygen consumption) under 3 conditions; Control, ECMO, and ECMO+Impella (ECPELLA) in each dog. In protocol 2 (n=15), we ligated coronary arteries for 180 min and then reperfused. We activated Impella CP and/or ECMO from 60 min after the coronary ligation to the end of the experiment. We allocated dogs into 3 groups, no support (Control), ECMO, and ECPELLA and compared infarct size at 180 min after reperfusion among 3 groups. Results: In protocol 1, both ECMO and ECPELLA increased arterial pressure compared to Control (Control: 63±9, ECMO: 88±10 and ECPELLA: 97±18 mmHg, p < 0.05), and resolved the CS status. ECPELLA strikingly reduced PVA by 83% relative to Control (1500±326, 2038±357 and 258±182 mmHg*ml, p<0.001). In protocol 2, ECPELLA markedly reduced the infarct size (15±8%) compared to Control (53±7%, p<0.05) and ECMO (39±10%, p<0.05). Conclusions: ECPELLA before reperfusion markedly improved hemodynamics, reduced PVA, and limited infarct size in a dog model of MI with CS. ECPELLA could prevent ECMO-induced LV overload and synergistically exert powerful anti-infarct effects in AMI with CS.


Author(s):  
Jeroen Dauw ◽  
Wilfried Mullens ◽  
Johan Vijgen ◽  
Pascal Vranckx

Acute heart failure syndrome has been defined as new-onset or a recurrence of worsening signs and symptoms of heart failure, necessitating urgent or emergency management. The management of acute heart failure syndrome is challenging, given the heterogeneity of the patient population, in terms of the clinical presentation, pathophysiology, prognosis, and therapeutic options. The management of acute heart failure syndrome is a dynamic process, requiring ongoing simultaneous diagnosis (monitoring) and treatment. Pharmacological agents remain the mainstay of therapy for acute heart failure syndrome. However, at all time, during the early diagnostic, etiologic, and therapeutic work-up, non-pharmacologic therapy may be indicated and should be considered. The management of the complex cardiac patient with acute heart failure syndrome and/or (potential) haemodynamic compromise has become a special dimension for specialized myocardial intervention centres, providing 24 hours per day and 7 days per week state-of-the-art facilities for (primary) percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiac intensive care, including mechanical ventilation, ultrafiltration, with or without dialysis, and short-term percutaneous mechanical circulatory support. Through the understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and approaches into the problems of acute heart failure syndrome, one should be better prepared to understand and treat its many facets.



2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Francesca Cannata ◽  
Gianluca Vadalà ◽  
Fabrizio Russo ◽  
Rocco Papalia ◽  
Nicola Napoli ◽  
...  

One of the main goals of diabetic therapy is to achieve the best metabolic control to prevent the development and progression of potential complications. A multidisciplinary approach characterized by the combination of diet, physical activity (PA) and drug therapy with oral and injectable (non-insulin) pharmacological agents, is desirable to optimize metabolic control. The aim of this review is to explain the contribution of PA and its beneficial effects on patients affected by type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). We provide an overview of evidence on the effects of PA for the main two types of diabetes mellitus (DM) to identify the right level of PA to be recommended. We discuss the physiological and clinical role of PA in people with DM. It can be concluded that the objective of antidiabetic therapy should be the achievement and optimization of metabolic control through a multidisciplinary approach involving non-pharmacological therapy such as diet and PA, which has a crucial role.


Circulation ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
D N Sharpe ◽  
E H Botvinick ◽  
D M Shames ◽  
A Norman ◽  
K Chatterjee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document