Dissociated lower limb muscle involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

2015 ◽  
Vol 262 (6) ◽  
pp. 1424-1432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil G. Simon ◽  
Michael Lee ◽  
Jong Seok Bae ◽  
Eneida Mioshi ◽  
Cindy S.-Y. Lin ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fangfang Hu ◽  
Jiaoting Jin ◽  
Qiaoyi Chen ◽  
Li Kang ◽  
Rui Jia ◽  
...  

AbstractTo explore differential diagnosis value of dissociated lower-limb muscle impairment, we performed a retrospective analysis of clinical and electrophysiological features in 141 lower-limb involved ALS patients, 218 normal controls, 67 disease controls, and 32 lumbar spondylosis disease patients. The dissociated lower-limb muscle impairment was quantified by plantar flexion and dorsiflexion strength, compound muscle action potentials ratio of peroneal and tibial nerves (split index, SI) and semi-quantitative scoring scale of denervation potential. Clinical features: the proportion of decreased dorsiflexion was higher than decreased planter flexor strength in lower-limb involved ALS (77.2%vs 38.3%). Electrophysiological features: (1) SI in ALS was the lowest among four groups (Test statistic = 40.57, p < 0.001). (2) Percentage of positive denervation potential was higher in tibialis anterior than gastrocnemius muscle (χ2 = 87.12, p < 0.001). ROC curve: the SI cutoff was 0.52 and 0.33 respectively to differentiate ALS from lumbar spondylosis disease and peripheral neuropathy. Lower-limb involved ALS patients exhibited “split leg” phenomenon. The SI value could be used as an electrophysiological marker to differentiate ALS from lumbar spondylosis disease and peripheral neuropathy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (17) ◽  
pp. 2347-2351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuta Kojima ◽  
Yu-ichi Noto ◽  
Daiki Takewaki ◽  
Naoki Tokuda ◽  
Kensuke Shiga ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-73
Author(s):  
Young-Joo Moon ◽  
Won-Bin Shin ◽  
Gwang-Hyun Ryu ◽  
Ji-Yun Lee ◽  
Hyun-A Jeon ◽  
...  

Diabetes Care ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 441-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monirah M. Almurdhi ◽  
Neil D. Reeves ◽  
Frank L. Bowling ◽  
Andrew J.M. Boulton ◽  
Maria Jeziorska ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Kara B. Bellenfant ◽  
Gracie L. Robbins ◽  
Rebecca R. Rogers ◽  
Thomas J. Kopec ◽  
Christopher G. Ballmann

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of how limb dominance and joint immobilization alter markers of physical demand and muscle activation during ambulation with axillary crutches. In a crossover, counterbalanced study design, physically active females completed ambulation trials with three conditions: (1) bipedal walking (BW), (2) axillary crutch ambulation with their dominant limb (DOM), and (3) axillary crutch ambulation with their nondominant limb (NDOM). During the axillary crutch ambulation conditions, the non-weight-bearing knee joint was immobilized at a 30-degree flexion angle with a postoperative knee stabilizer. For each trial/condition, participants ambulated at 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 mph for five minutes at each speed. Heart rate (HR) and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were monitored throughout. Surface electromyography (sEMG) was used to record muscle activation of the medial gastrocnemius (MG), soleus (SOL), and tibialis anterior (TA) unilaterally on the weight-bearing limb. Biceps brachii (BB) and triceps brachii (TB) sEMG were measured bilaterally. sEMG signals for each immobilization condition were normalized to corresponding values for BW.HR (p < 0.001) and RPE (p < 0.001) were significantly higher for both the DOM and NDOM conditions compared to BW but no differences existed between the DOM and NDOM conditions (p > 0.05). No differences in lower limb muscle activation were noted for any muscles between the DOM and NDOM conditions (p > 0.05). Regardless of condition, BB activation ipsilateral to the ambulating limb was significantly lower during 0.6 mph (p = 0.005) and 0.8 mph (p = 0.016) compared to the same speeds for BB on the contralateral side. Contralateral TB activation was significantly higher during 0.6 mph compared to 0.8 mph (p = 0.009) and 1.0 mph (p = 0.029) irrespective of condition. In conclusion, limb dominance appears to not alter lower limb muscle activation and walking intensity while using axillary crutches. However, upper limb muscle activation was asymmetrical during axillary crutch use and largely dependent on speed. These results suggest that functional asymmetry may exist in upper limbs but not lower limbs during assistive device supported ambulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document