Prevalence of factor V Leiden mutation in young adults with cerebral ischaemia: a case-control study on 225 patients

1998 ◽  
Vol 245 (10) ◽  
pp. 653-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. G. Nabavi ◽  
Ralf Junker ◽  
Endrik Wolff ◽  
Peter Lüdemann ◽  
Christopher Doherty ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4052-4052
Author(s):  
Gregoire Le Gal ◽  
Karine Lacut ◽  
Francis Couturaud ◽  
Emmanuel Oger ◽  
Dominique Mottier

Abstract Introduction: Factor V Leiden is the most common inherited risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). A four- to sevenfold increased risk of VTE for the heterozygous state has been reported by numerous epidemiological studies but most of them did not include patients over 70 years. Surprisingly, we found in a previous study no association between Factor V Leiden and VTE in patients over 70 years. Methods Therefore we conducted a large hospital-based matched case-control study to test the hypothesis of an interaction between age and the factor V mutation, as well as G20210A prothrombin gene variation. Results: We analysed 392 patients experiencing VTE not related to a major acquired risk factor and their matched controls. Factor V Leiden was not associated with VTE in patients aged 80 years and over: odds ratio 0.8 (95%CI 0.2-3.4). There was a significant interaction between age and the mutation for VTE risk (p=0.03). Conversely, the association between the G20210A variant and VTE was consistent across age-groups: odds ratio 2.8 (95%CI 1.4–5.8). In conclusion, age may modify the relation between factor V Leiden and VTE. The prevalence of the factor V mutation decreased with increasing age among patients with VTE but not among controls.


2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. M. HILTUNEN ◽  
H. LAIVUORI ◽  
A. RAUTANEN ◽  
R. KAAJA ◽  
J. KERE ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leena M Hiltunen ◽  
Hannele Laivuori ◽  
Anna Rautanen ◽  
Risto Kaaja ◽  
Juha Kere ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. e0194973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adeline Heraudeau ◽  
Aurélien Delluc ◽  
Mickaël Le Henaff ◽  
Karine Lacut ◽  
Christophe Leroyer ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
A. Seval Ozgu-Erdinc ◽  
Pınar Gulsen Coban ◽  
Nafiye Yilmaz ◽  
Zuhal Candemir ◽  
Saynur Yilmaz ◽  
...  

Objective: The association between recurrent implantation failure and thrombophilia is still controversial depending on the published reports with conflicting results. In this study, we aimed to assess the clinical relevance of screening women with recurrent implantation failure for some thrombophilic variants including factor V H1299R (FV HR2) haplotype. Study Design: A total of 279 women were recruited in this case-control study. 229 women with a history of recurrent implantation failure and 50 fertile control with no history of pregnancy losses were screened for eight specific gene mutations, regarding factor V G1691A gene (FV Leiden), FV HR2, factor II prothrombin G20210A, factor XIII V34L, PAI-1 4G/5G, MTHFR C677T, MTHFR A1298C and A3 haplotype of the endothelial cell protein C receptor gene. Results: Recurrent implantation failure group displayed a significantly higher prevalence of FV HR2 heterozygosity than fertile controls while the frequency of FV Leiden mutation was comparable between groups (p=0.011; p=0.619). Additionally, the difference in the prevalence of other specific or total gene mutations among women with recurrent implantation failure was also insignificant. Discussion: The primer outcome of this study was the co-existence of the higher prevalence of FV HR2 haplotype and the insignificant percentage of FV Leiden mutation in women with recurrent implantation failure. Thus, we emphasize that the HR2 haplotype may be associated with recurrent implantation failure particularly in non-carriers for FV Leiden mutation. In the necessity of screening for thrombophilia in recurrent implantation failure, HR2 haplotype should be involved in the searched gene panel particularly in the absence of FV Leiden mutation. Further large-scale prospective studies are needed to investigate whether screening or treatment for HR2 haplotype has any detrimental impact on implantation success in cases of recurrent implantation failure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document