scholarly journals Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas: diagnosis and pitfalls

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Björn Konukiewitz ◽  
Moritz Jesinghaus ◽  
Atsuko Kasajima ◽  
Günter Klöppel
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Chromogranin A ◽  
Molecular Profile ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Histological Differentiation ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Poorly Differentiated ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Diagnostic Pitfalls ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

AbstractCommon to neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas is their expression of synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and/or INSM1. They differ, however, in their histological differentiation and molecular profile. Three groups can be distinguished: well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (neuroendocrine tumors), poorly differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (neuroendocrine carcinomas), and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms. However, the expression of synaptophysin and, to a lesser extent, also chromogranin A is not restricted to the neuroendocrine neoplasms, but may also be in a subset of non-neuroendocrine epithelial and non-epithelial neoplasms. This review provides the essential criteria for the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms including diagnostic clues for the distinction of high-grade neuroendocrine tumors from neuroendocrine carcinomas and an algorithm avoiding diagnostic pitfalls in the delineation of non-neuroendocrine neoplasms with neuroendocrine features from pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

scholarly journals Molecular Pathology of Well-Differentiated Pulmonary and Thymic Neuroendocrine Tumors: What Do Pathologists Need to Know?

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 154-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Volante ◽  
Ozgur Mete ◽  
Giuseppe Pelosi ◽  
Anja C. Roden ◽  
Ernst Jan M. Speel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Carcinoid Tumors ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Grey Zone ◽  
Cell Hyperplasia ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Familial Form ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

AbstractThoracic (pulmonary and thymic) neuroendocrine tumors are well-differentiated epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms that are classified into typical and atypical carcinoid tumors based on mitotic index cut offs and presence or absence of necrosis. This classification scheme is of great prognostic value but designed for surgical specimens, only. Deep molecular characterization of thoracic neuroendocrine tumors highlighted their difference with neuroendocrine carcinomas. Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung are characterized by a low mutational burden, and a high prevalence of mutations in chromatin remodeling and histone modification-related genes, whereas mutations in genes frequently altered in neuroendocrine carcinomas are rare. Molecular profiling divided thymic neuroendocrine tumors into three clusters with distinct clinical outcomes and characterized by a different average of copy number instability. Moreover, integrated histopathological, molecular and clinical evidence supports the existence of a grey zone category between neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoid tumors) and neuroendocrine carcinomas. Indeed, cases with well differentiated morphology but mitotic/Ki-67 indexes close to neuroendocrine carcinomas have been increasingly recognized. These are characterized by specific molecular profiles and have an aggressive clinical behavior. Finally, thoracic neuroendocrine tumors may arise in the background of genetic susceptibility, being MEN1 syndrome the well-defined familial form. However, pathologists should be aware of rarer germline variants that are associated with the concurrence of neuroendocrine tumors of the lung or their precursors (such as DIPNECH) with other neoplasms, including but not limited to breast carcinomas. Therefore, genetic counseling for all young patients with thoracic neuroendocrine neoplasia and/or any patient with pathological evidence of neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia-to-neoplasia progression sequence or multifocal disease should be considered.

Classification and pathology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S1-S16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Günter Klöppel
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Tract ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumours ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumour ◽  
Tnm Stage ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Poorly Differentiated ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are composed of cells with a neuroendocrine phenotype. The old and the new WHO classifications distinguish between well-differentiated and poorly differentiated neoplasms. All well-differentiated neoplasms, regardless of whether they behave benignly or develop metastases, will be called neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), and graded G1 (Ki67 <2%) or G2 (Ki67 2–20%). All poorly differentiated neoplasms will be termed neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and graded G3 (Ki67 >20%). To stratify the GEP-NETs and GEP-NECs regarding their prognosis, they are now further classified according to TNM-stage systems that were recently proposed by the European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS) and the AJCC/UICC. In the light of these criteria the pathology and biology of the various NETs and NECs of the gastrointestinal tract (including the oesophagus) and the pancreas are reviewed.

scholarly journals Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Landscape and Horizon

2020 ◽  
Vol 144 (7) ◽  
pp. 816-828
Author(s):  
Laura H. Tang
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Important Distinction ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinoma ◽  
Poorly Differentiated ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Initial Description ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Hereditary Conditions

Context.— Since the initial description of pancreatic endocrine physiology and the recognition of islet cell tumors in the 1800s, there have been noteworthy advances in the pathobiology of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs), and definition of the important distinction between well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (PanNET) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (PanNEC). The evolving knowledge has resulted in a continuous update in terminology, classification, and grading system for this group of neoplasms. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors associated with hereditary conditions have been linked to unique molecular and genetic events, and sporadic PanNETs have specific gene signatures. Based on accumulative experience and knowledge, therapeutic strategies have been defined for this group of neoplasms. Objective.— To review the evolution and description of the pathologic-genomic evolution of PanNENs, and to facilitate accurate pathologic interpretation for the corresponding clinical management. Data Sources.— Literature review of published studies and author's own work. Conclusions.— Evolving experience and knowledge have established subtypes of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, based on their genotype and phenotype. Accurate pathologic interpretation of the specific neoplasm has significant implications for therapy and prognosis.

scholarly journals Multimodal Management of Grade 1 and 2 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Cancers ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 433
Author(s):  
Ugo Marchese ◽  
Martin Gaillard ◽  
Anna Pellat ◽  
Stylianos Tzedakis ◽  
Einas Abou Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Postoperative Morbidity ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Tips And Tricks ◽  
Poorly Differentiated ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Multimodal Management ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NETs) are rare tumors with a recent growing incidence. In the 2017 WHO classification, p-NETs are classified into well-differentiated (i.e., p-NETs grade 1 to 3) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (i.e., p-NECs). P-NETs G1 and G2 are often non-functioning tumors, of which the prognosis depends on the metastatic status. In the localized setting, p-NETs should be surgically managed, as no benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy has been demonstrated. Parenchymal sparing resection, including both duodenum and pancreas, are safe procedures in selected patients with reduced endocrine and exocrine long-term dysfunction. When the p-NET is benign or borderline malignant, this surgical option is associated with low rates of severe postoperative morbidity and in-hospital mortality. This narrative review offers comments, tips, and tricks from reviewing the available literature on these different options in order to clarify their indications. We also sum up the overall current data on p-NETs G1 and G2 management.

scholarly journals INSM1 Expression in Breast Neoplasms with Neuroedocrine Features

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasna Metovic ◽  
Isabella Castellano ◽  
Eleonora Marinelli ◽  
Simona Osella-Abate ◽  
Anna Sapino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromogranin A ◽  
Mixed Type ◽  
Breast Tumors ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Pathological Characteristics ◽  
Poorly Differentiated ◽  
Well Differentiated

AbstractAccording to the 2019 WHO classification of breast tumors, neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are classified into well-differentiated NE tumors (NET) and poorly differentiated NE carcinomas (NEC), while other breast cancers (BCs) of special and no special type with neuroendocrine (NE) features are not incorporated in this scheme anymore. We aimed to assess whether INSM1, a novel NE marker, could have a role in breast NEN subtyping. We selected 63 BCs operated from 2003 to 2018, classified as BCs with NE features, with available clinico-pathological data. Following 2019 WHO criteria, this cohort was reclassified into 37 NETs/NECs, the remaining 26 tumors representing solid-papillary (7), mucinous (7), and mixed type (12) carcinomas with NE differentiation. Chromogranin A (CGA) and synaptophysin (SYN) immunostains were reviewed, and INSM1 was tested by immunohistochemistry. Thirty CGA- and SYN-negative no special type BCs served as negative control. INSM1 was expressed in 52/63 cases of the whole cohort (82.54%). INSM1 positive and negative cases had no significantly different clinico-pathological characteristics. INSM1 expression was not significantly different between the newly reclassified NET/NEC group and other BCs with NE features. No immunoexpression was observed in control BCs. The sensitivity and specificity of INSM1 for the NE phenotype was 82.5% and 100%, respectively, compared to 61.9% and 100% for CGA, and 95.2 and 100% for SYN. In conclusion, INSM1 is as accurate as traditional NE biomarkers to identify NE differentiation in BC. In analogy to standard NE markers, INSM1 could not distinguish NET and NEC from the other BC histotypes with NE differentiation.

Modern approaches to the treatment of gastric neuroendocrine tumors

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-168
Author(s):  
Ivan N. Peregorodiev ◽  
V. Y Bokhian ◽  
I. S Stilidi ◽  
V. V Delektorskaya
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Morphological Type ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Type I ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
High Proliferative Activity ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
The One ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs) include a wide range of tumors with different variants of the course of the disease. At the one end of the clinical spectrum there are highly differentiated type I GI-NETs, with five-year survival rate over 95%, at the another end there are low-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (large-, smallcell cancers) representing a tumor with extremely poor prognosis. Therapeutic approaches to different types of tumors are different. It is necessary to distinguish the treatment of well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (I and II clinical-morphological type) and low-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. At the same time, it should be noted how different is the treatment of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors with high proliferative activity index (III clinico-morphological type of tumor) and low-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (large-, small-cell cancers).

scholarly journals Mixed Neuroendocrine/Non-neuroendocrine Neoplasm (MiNEN) of the Ovary Arising from Endometriosis: Molecular Pathology Analysis in Support of a Pathogenetic Paradigm

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Maragliano ◽  
Laura Libera ◽  
Ileana Carnevali ◽  
Valeria Pensotti ◽  
Giovanna De Vecchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Cell ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasm ◽  
Molecular Profile ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Sequencing Analysis ◽  
Endometrioid Carcinoma ◽  
Preneoplastic Lesions ◽  
Ovarian Endometriosis ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

AbstractPrimary ovarian neuroendocrine neoplasms (Ov-NENs) are infrequent and mainly represented by well-differentiated forms (neuroendocrine tumors — NETs — or carcinoids). Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (Ov-NECs) are exceedingly rare and only few cases have been reported in the literature. A subset of Ov-NECs are admixed with non-neuroendocrine carcinomas, as it occurs in other female genital organs, as well (mostly endometrium and uterine cervix), and may be assimilated to mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) described in digestive and extra-digestive sites. Here, we present a case of large cell Ov-NEC admixed with an endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary, arising in the context of ovarian endometriosis, associated with a uterine endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH). We performed targeted next-generation sequencing analysis, along with a comprehensive immunohistochemical study and FISH analysis for TP53 locus, separately on the four morphologically distinct lesions (Ov-NEC, endometrioid carcinoma, endometriosis, and EAH). The results of our study identified molecular alterations of cancer-related genes (PIK3CA, CTNNB1, TP53, RB1, ARID1A, and p16), which were present with an increasing gradient from preneoplastic lesions to malignant proliferations, both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components. In conclusion, our findings underscored that the two neoplastic components of this Ov-MiNEN share a substantially identical molecular profile and they progress from a preexisting ovarian endometriotic lesion, in a patient with a coexisting preneoplastic proliferation of the endometrium, genotypically and phenotypically related to the ovarian neoplasm. Moreover, this study supports the inclusion of MiNEN in the spectrum ovarian and, possibly, of all gynecological NENs, among which they are currently not classified.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document