scholarly journals Mixed Neuroendocrine/Non-neuroendocrine Neoplasm (MiNEN) of the Ovary Arising from Endometriosis: Molecular Pathology Analysis in Support of a Pathogenetic Paradigm

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Maragliano ◽  
Laura Libera ◽  
Ileana Carnevali ◽  
Valeria Pensotti ◽  
Giovanna De Vecchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Cell ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasm ◽  
Molecular Profile ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Sequencing Analysis ◽  
Endometrioid Carcinoma ◽  
Preneoplastic Lesions ◽  
Ovarian Endometriosis ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

AbstractPrimary ovarian neuroendocrine neoplasms (Ov-NENs) are infrequent and mainly represented by well-differentiated forms (neuroendocrine tumors — NETs — or carcinoids). Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (Ov-NECs) are exceedingly rare and only few cases have been reported in the literature. A subset of Ov-NECs are admixed with non-neuroendocrine carcinomas, as it occurs in other female genital organs, as well (mostly endometrium and uterine cervix), and may be assimilated to mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) described in digestive and extra-digestive sites. Here, we present a case of large cell Ov-NEC admixed with an endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary, arising in the context of ovarian endometriosis, associated with a uterine endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH). We performed targeted next-generation sequencing analysis, along with a comprehensive immunohistochemical study and FISH analysis for TP53 locus, separately on the four morphologically distinct lesions (Ov-NEC, endometrioid carcinoma, endometriosis, and EAH). The results of our study identified molecular alterations of cancer-related genes (PIK3CA, CTNNB1, TP53, RB1, ARID1A, and p16), which were present with an increasing gradient from preneoplastic lesions to malignant proliferations, both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components. In conclusion, our findings underscored that the two neoplastic components of this Ov-MiNEN share a substantially identical molecular profile and they progress from a preexisting ovarian endometriotic lesion, in a patient with a coexisting preneoplastic proliferation of the endometrium, genotypically and phenotypically related to the ovarian neoplasm. Moreover, this study supports the inclusion of MiNEN in the spectrum ovarian and, possibly, of all gynecological NENs, among which they are currently not classified.

Comparative Outcomes in Patients With Small- and Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (NEC) and Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasm (MiNEN) of the Stomach

2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482095000
Author(s):  
Nam Young Choi ◽  
Byung-Sik Kim ◽  
Sung Tae Oh ◽  
Jeong Hwan Yook ◽  
Beom Su Kim
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasm ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Intermediate Grade ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

Background Gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), consisting of both large- and small-cell NECs, and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs), including mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs), are a group of high-grade malignancies. Few studies to date have reported clinical outcomes, including prognosis, in patients with these tumors. This study therefore evaluated the clinicopathologic outcomes and prognosis in patients with NECs and MANECs. Methods This study included 36 patients diagnosed with gastric NECs, including 23 with large-cell and 13 with small-cell NECs, and 85 with MiNENs, including 70 with high-grade and 15 with intermediate-grade MiNENs. Clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), were assessed. Results DFS was significantly poorer in patients with NEC than in patients with intermediate-grade MiNEN ( P < .05), whereas both OS and DFS were similar in patients with NEC and high-grade MiNEN ( P > .05). Patients with large-cell NEC were more likely to undergo aggressive surgery than patients with high-grade MiNEN ( P < .05). Lymphovascular invasion was more frequent and DFS poorer in patients with large-cell than small-cell NECs ( P < .05 each). Conclusion DFS is significantly poorer in patients with NEC than in patients with intermediate-grade MiNEN and significantly lower in patients with large-cell than small-cell NECs.

scholarly journals Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix: A Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Study with Focus on Novel Markers (Sst2–Sst5)

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1211
Author(s):  
Frediano Inzani ◽  
Angela Santoro ◽  
Giuseppe Angelico ◽  
Angela Feraco ◽  
Saveria Spadola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Target Therapy ◽  
Somatostatin Receptors ◽  
Neuroendocrine Differentiation ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Somatostatin Analogues ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

Background. Gynecological neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are extremely rare, accounting for 1.2–2.4% of the NENs. The aim of this study was to test cervical NENs for novel markers of potential utility for differential diagnosis and target therapy. Methods. All cases of our center (n = 16) were retrieved and tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for 12 markers including markers of neuroendocrine differentiation (chromogranin A, synaptophysin, CD56), transcription factors (CDX2 and TTF1), proteins p40, p63, p16INK4a, and p53, somatostatin receptors subtypes (SST2-SST5) and the proliferation marker Ki67 (MIB1). Results. All cases were poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), 10 small cell types (small cell–neuroendocrine carcinomas, SCNECs) and 6 large cell types (large cell–neuroendocrine carcinomas, LCNECs); in 3 cases a predominant associated adenocarcinoma component was observed. Neuroendocrine cancer cells expressed at least 2 of the 3 tested neuroendocrine markers; p16 was intensely expressed in 14 (87.5%) cases; SST5 in 11 (56.25%, score 2–3, in 9 cases); SST2 in 8 (50%, score 2–3 in 8), CDX2 in 8 (50%), TTF1 in 5 (31.25%), and p53 in 1 case (0.06%). P63 and p40 expressions were negative, with the exception of one case that showed moderate expression for p63. Conclusions. P40 is a more useful marker for the differential diagnosis compared to squamous cell carcinoma. Neither CDX2 nor TTF1 expression may help the differential diagnosis versus potential cervical metastasis. P16 expression may suggest a cervical origin of NEC; however, it must be always integrated by clinical and instrumental data. The expression of SST2 and SST5 could support a role for SSAs (Somatostatin Analogues) in the diagnosis and therapy of patients with cervical NECs.

Neuroendocrine Tumors of Larynx

1992 ◽  
Vol 101 (8) ◽  
pp. 710-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adel K. El-Naggar ◽  
John G. Batsakis ◽  
Mario A. Luna
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasm ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Neural Basis ◽  
Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma ◽  
Typical Carcinoid ◽  
Clinical Behavior ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the larynx have either an epithelial or a neural basis. The former are more numerous and are classified as typical or atypical carcinoids and small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas. Paraganglioma is the sole type of neural neuroendocrine neoplasm. There is a significant worsening of prognosis from typical carcinoid to small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, with the latter having a dismal 5-year survival rate regardless of therapy. Paragangliomas are the most benign of laryngeal neuroendocrine neoplasms, but their clinical behavior may not be predictable on the basis of their histologic appearance.

scholarly journals O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase and glucose transporter 2 in foregut and hindgut gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirofumi Watanabe ◽  
Yuto Yamazaki ◽  
Fumiyoshi Fujishima ◽  
Komoto Izumi ◽  
Masayuki Imamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Efficacy ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Glucose Transporter ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasm ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Glucose Transporter 2 ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

Abstract Background: Streptozocin (STZ) is used for treating both pancreatic (PanNET) and gastrointestinal (GI-NET) neuroendocrine tumors but its therapeutic efficacy is relatively low in GI-NETs. Therefore, it has become pivotal to select GI-NET patients who could benefit from STZ treatment. STZ is transported via the glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2) into the cells and the loss of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) also increases its therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, GLUT2 high and MGMT low status could be the surrogate markers of STZ. Methods: In this study, we examined the MGMT and GLUT2 status in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN). We studied 84 NEN cases: 33 foregut and 37 hindgut GI-NETs and 14 gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinomas (GI-NECs). Results: In GI-NETs, MGMT scores of ≥2 and ≥3 were 77% (54/70) and 56% (39/70), respectively, and GLUT2 scores of ≥4 and ≥6 were 30% (21/70) and 4.3% (3/70), respectively. Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction revealed that MGMT promoter methylation was detected only in 2/14 GI-NECs but none of the included GI-NETs. GLUT2 (GLUT2 score) and MGMT immunoreactivity (MGMT and H-scores) were both significantly correlated with Ki-67 labeling index (GLUT2 score: P = 0.0045, ρ = -0.4570; MGMT score: P = 0.0064, ρ = -0.4399; H-score: P = 0.0110, ρ = -0.4135) and MGMT immunoreactivity were significantly correlated with GLUT2 immunoreactivity (MGMT score: P = 0.0198; H-score, P = 0.0004, ρ = 0.5483) in hindgut NETs, but not in foregut NETs. However, discrepancies from the above correlation between GLUT2 and MGMT immunoreactivity were detected in several GI-NET cases which could be potential candidates for STZ therapy. Conclusion: The evaluation of MGMT and GLUT2 status could provide an important information in planning STZ therapy in GI-NET patients.

scholarly journals O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase and glucose transporter 2 in foregut and hindgut gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirofumi Watanabe ◽  
Yuto Yamazaki ◽  
Fumiyoshi Fujishima ◽  
Komoto Izumi ◽  
Masayuki Imamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Efficacy ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Glucose Transporter ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasm ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Glucose Transporter 2 ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

Abstract Background Streptozocin (STZ) is used for treating both pancreatic (PanNET) and gastrointestinal (GI-NET) neuroendocrine tumors but its therapeutic efficacy is relatively low in GI-NETs. Therefore, it has become pivotal to select GI-NET patients who could benefit from STZ treatment. STZ is transported via the glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2) into the cells and the loss of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) also increases its therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, GLUT2 high and MGMT low status could be the surrogate markers of STZ. Methods In this study, we examined the MGMT and GLUT2 status in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN). We studied 84 NEN cases: 33 foregut and 37 hindgut GI-NETs and 14 gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinomas (GI-NECs). Results In GI-NETs, MGMT scores of ≥2 and ≥ 3 were 77% (54/70) and 56% (39/70), respectively, and GLUT2 scores of ≥4 and ≥ 6 were 30% (21/70) and 4.3% (3/70), respectively. Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction revealed that MGMT promoter methylation was detected only in 2/14 GI-NECs but none of the included GI-NETs. GLUT2 (GLUT2 score) and MGMT immunoreactivity (MGMT and H-scores) were both significantly correlated with Ki-67 labeling index (GLUT2 score: P = 0.0045, ρ = − 0.4570; MGMT score: P = 0.0064, ρ = − 0.4399; H-score: P = 0.0110, ρ = − 0.4135) and MGMT immunoreactivity were significantly correlated with GLUT2 immunoreactivity (MGMT score: P = 0.0198; H-score, P = 0.0004, ρ = 0.5483) in hindgut NETs, but not in foregut NETs. However, discrepancies from the above correlation between GLUT2 and MGMT immunoreactivity were detected in several GI-NET cases which could be potential candidates for STZ therapy. Conclusion The evaluation of MGMT and GLUT2 status could provide an important information in planning STZ therapy in GI-NET patients.

scholarly journals Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the lung: a pathology update

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasna Metovic ◽  
Marco Barella ◽  
Giuseppe Pelosi
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Differentiation ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasm ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Blue Book ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Resection Specimen ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

Summary Purpose Neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas in the lung are distinct and separate entities featuring neuroendocrine differentiation, for which an accurate classification is clinically warranted. Materials and methods Three perspectives were addressed: (i) diagnostic tools, with the terminology to be used in either resection specimen or small-sized material; (ii) the so-called carcinoid tumors with elevated proliferation rates (mitotic and/or Ki-67 activity); (iii) predictive biomarkers based on immunohistochemical characterization. Results We herein provide a pathology update on lung neuroendocrine neoplasm classification that will appear in the forthcoming 5th edition of the WHO Blue Book, including a short discussion about biomarkers, which are presently given full consideration in clinical practice. Conclusion The WHO classification on lung neuroendocrine neoplasms is the cornerstone to provide the best clinical management of patients and is the starting point for any investigative insight.

scholarly journals Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas: diagnosis and pitfalls

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Björn Konukiewitz ◽  
Moritz Jesinghaus ◽  
Atsuko Kasajima ◽  
Günter Klöppel
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Chromogranin A ◽  
Molecular Profile ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Histological Differentiation ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Poorly Differentiated ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Diagnostic Pitfalls ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

AbstractCommon to neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas is their expression of synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and/or INSM1. They differ, however, in their histological differentiation and molecular profile. Three groups can be distinguished: well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (neuroendocrine tumors), poorly differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (neuroendocrine carcinomas), and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms. However, the expression of synaptophysin and, to a lesser extent, also chromogranin A is not restricted to the neuroendocrine neoplasms, but may also be in a subset of non-neuroendocrine epithelial and non-epithelial neoplasms. This review provides the essential criteria for the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms including diagnostic clues for the distinction of high-grade neuroendocrine tumors from neuroendocrine carcinomas and an algorithm avoiding diagnostic pitfalls in the delineation of non-neuroendocrine neoplasms with neuroendocrine features from pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

scholarly journals O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase and glucose transporter 2 in foregut and hindgut gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirofumi Watanabe ◽  
Yuto Yamazaki ◽  
Fumiyoshi Fujishima ◽  
Komoto Izumi ◽  
Masayuki Imamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Efficacy ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Glucose Transporter ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasm ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Glucose Transporter 2 ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

Abstract Background: Streptozocin (STZ) is used for treating both pancreatic (PanNET) and gastrointestinal (GI-NET) neuroendocrine tumors but its therapeutic efficacy is relatively low in GI-NETs. Therefore, it has become pivotal to select GI-NET patients who could benefit from STZ treatment. STZ is transported via the glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2) into the cells and the loss of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) also increases its therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, GLUT2 high and MGMT low status could be the surrogate markers of STZ. Methods: In this study, we examined the MGMT and GLUT2 status in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN). We studied 84 NEN cases: 33 foregut and 37 hindgut GI-NETs and 14 gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinomas (GI-NECs). Results: In GI-NETs, MGMT scores of ≥2 and ≥3 were 77% (54/70) and 56% (39/70), respectively, and GLUT2 scores of ≥4 and ≥6 were 30% (21/70) and 4.3% (3/70), respectively. Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction revealed that MGMT promoter methylation was detected only in 2/14 GI-NECs but none of the included GI-NETs. GLUT2 (GLUT2 score) and MGMT immunoreactivity (MGMT and H-scores) were both significantly correlated with Ki-67 labeling index (GLUT2 score: P = 0.0045, ρ = -0.4570; MGMT score: P = 0.0064, ρ = -0.4399; H-score: P = 0.0110, ρ = -0.4135) and MGMT immunoreactivity were significantly correlated with GLUT2 immunoreactivity (MGMT score: P = 0.0198; H-score, P = 0.0004, ρ = 0.5483) in hindgut NETs, but not in foregut NETs. However, discrepancies from the above correlation between GLUT2 and MGMT immunoreactivity were detected in several GI-NET cases which could be potential candidates for STZ therapy. Conclusion: The evaluation of MGMT and GLUT2 status could provide an important information in planning STZ therapy in GI-NET patients.

scholarly journals Lung neuroendocrine neoplasms: recent progress and persistent challenges

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Rekhtman
Keyword(s):  
Recent Progress ◽  
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasm ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Cell Lung Carcinoma ◽  
Immunohistochemical Markers

AbstractThis review summarizes key recent developments relevant to the pathologic diagnosis of lung neuroendocrine neoplasms, including carcinoids, small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC), and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). Covered are recent insights into the biological subtypes within each main tumor type, progress in pathological diagnosis and immunohistochemical markers, and persistent challenging areas. Highlighted topics include highly proliferative carcinoids and their distinction from small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), the evolving role of Ki67, the update on the differential diagnosis of NEC to include thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumors, the recent data on SCLC transcriptional subtypes with the emergence of POU2F3 as a novel marker for the diagnosis of SCLC with low/negative expression of standard neuroendocrine markers, and the update on the diagnosis of LCNEC, particularly in biopsies. There has been remarkable recent progress in the understanding of the genetic and expression-based profiles within each type of lung neuroendocrine neoplasm, and it is hoped that these insights will enable the development of novel diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers to aid in the pathologic assessment of these tumors in the future.

scholarly journals Primary MiNEN of the urinary bladder: an hitherto undescribed entity composed of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma with a distinct clinical behavior

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giacomo Maria Pini ◽  
Silvia Uccella ◽  
Matteo Corinti ◽  
Maurizio Colecchia ◽  
Giuseppe Pelosi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Bladder ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Unique Case ◽  
Clinical Behavior ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

AbstractNeuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) of the urinary bladder are very rare and can be observed in the context of mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs), most frequently in association with urothelial carcinoma. Small cell NECs are far more common than large cell NECs (LCNECs), which are exceedingly rare. We describe a primary MiNEN of the urinary bladder, composed of a LCNEC and of an adenocarcinoma, in which the neuroendocrine component reached complete pathological regression after neoadjuvant M-VAC chemotherapy, whereas the non-neuroendocrine component of the tumor progressed to metastatic disease. Compared to mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms described in the literature until now, this appears to be a unique case that expands the spectrum of neuroendocrine neoplasia of the urinary bladder.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document