Clinical safety and outcomes of laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for palliative resection of primary tumors in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 1902-1910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Wei Zhou ◽  
Xiao-Dong Gu ◽  
Jian-Bin Xiang ◽  
Zong-You Chen
2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 3201-3206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideaki Nishigori ◽  
Masaaki Ito ◽  
Yuji Nishizawa ◽  
Atsushi Kohyama ◽  
Takamaru Koda ◽  
...  

Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (17) ◽  
pp. e15347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Jun Song ◽  
Zhi-Li Liu ◽  
Rong Zeng ◽  
Wei Ye ◽  
Chang-Wei Liu

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3527-3527
Author(s):  
Shahid Ahmed ◽  
Anthony L.A. Fields ◽  
Leis Anne ◽  
Selliah Kanthan ◽  
Adnan Zaidi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Dong Peng ◽  
Yu-Xi Cheng ◽  
Yong Cheng

Purpose. The purpose of the current meta-analysis was to evaluate whether multidisciplinary team improved overall survival of colorectal cancer. Methods. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library database were searched from inception to October 25, 2020. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence (CI) of overall survival (OS) were calculated. Results. A total of 11 studies with 30814 patients were included in this meta-analysis. After pooling the HRs, the MDT group was associated with better OS compared with the non-MDT group ( HR = 0.81 , 95% CI 0.69-0.94, p = 0.005 ). In subgroup analysis of stage IV colorectal cancer, the MDT group was associated with better OS as well ( HR = 0.73 , 95% CI 0.59-0.90, p = 0.004 ). However, in terms of postoperative mortality, no significant difference was found between MDT and non-MDT groups ( OR = 0.84 , 95% CI 0.44-1.61, p = 0.60 ). Conclusion. MDT could improve OS of colorectal cancer patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document