scholarly journals Revision after failed discectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (S1) ◽  
pp. 14-21
Author(s):  
Christoph Mehren ◽  
Lorenz Wanke-Jellinek ◽  
Andreas Korge
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Scar Tissue ◽  
Common Complication ◽  
Disc Herniations ◽  
Clear Guideline ◽  
Supplementary Material ◽  
Clinical Register ◽  
Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation

Abstract Purpose Recurrent lumbar disc herniation is the most common complication after discectomy. Due to the altered anatomy with the presence of scar tissue, the surgical revision of already operated patients could be a surgical challenge. Methods We describe the microsurgical revision technique step by step with the evaluation of our own clinical results in comparison with primary lumbar disc surgeries. The clinical data are based on a clinical register with 2576 recorded primary surgeries (PD) and 592 cases of revisions (RD) with 12- and 24-month follow-up (FU). The intraoperative dura lesion rates of the surgeries between 2016 and 2018 were recorded retrospectively. Data from 894 primary disc surgeries and 117 revisions were evaluated. Results The ODI and the VAS for leg and back pain improved in both groups significantly with slightly inferior outcome of the revision group. The ODI improved from 46.3 (PD) and 45.9 (RD), respectively, to 12.6 (PD) and 22.9 (RD) at the 24-month FU. The VAS dropped down as well in both group [VAS back: 47.8 (PD) and 43.9 (RD) to 19.9 and 32.2 at the 24-month FU; VAS leg: 62.9 (PD) and 65.5 (RD) to 15.6 and 26.8 at the 24-month FU]. During the primary interventions, we observed 1.5% (11/894) and during revisions 7.7% (9/117) of dura lesions. Conclusions There is no clear guideline for the surgical treatment of recurrent disc herniations. In most cases, a pure re-discectomy is sufficient and can be performed safely and effectively with the help of a microscope. Graphic abstract These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Long-term follow-up of standard microdiscectomy versus minimal access surgery for lumbar disc herniations

2013 ◽  
Vol 155 (12) ◽  
pp. 2333-2338 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gempt ◽  
M. Jonek ◽  
F. Ringel ◽  
A. Preuß ◽  
P. Wolf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Minimal Access Surgery ◽  
Minimal Access ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Disc Herniations ◽  
Access Surgery

scholarly journals Five Cases of Lumbar Disc Herniations with Apparent Radiculopathy showing Resolution on Follow-up MRI Studies

1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 671-677
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Suzui ◽  
Junya Hanakita ◽  
Hideyuki Suwa
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Mri Studies ◽  
Disc Herniations

scholarly journals Surgical management of recurrent disc herniations with microdiscectomy and long-term results on life quality: Detailed analysis of 70 cases

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (01) ◽  
pp. 87-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serdal Albayrak ◽  
Sait Ozturk ◽  
Emre Durdag ◽  
Ömer Ayden
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Facet Joint ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Life Quality ◽  
Early Period ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Disc Herniations

ABSTRACT Background: Aim of this paper is to recall the surgical technique used in the recurrent lumbar disc herniations (LDHs) and to share our experiences. Materials and Methods: Out of series of 1115 patients who underwent operations for LDH between 2006 and 2013, 70 patients underwent re-operations, which were included in this study. During surgery, lateral decompression performed over the medial facet joint to the superior facet joint border was seen after widening the laminectomy defect, and microdiscectomy was performed. The demographic findings of the patients, their complaints in admission to hospital, the level of operation, the condition of dural injury, the first admission in the prospective analysis, and their quality of life were evaluated through the Oswestry scoring during their postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th-month and 1st, 3rd, 5th and 7th-year follow-up. In the statical analysis, Friedman test was performed for the comparison of the Oswestry scores and Siegel Castellan test was used for the paired nonparametrical data. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Considering the Oswestry Index during the follow-ups, the values in the postoperative early period and follow-ups were seen to be significantly lower than those at the time of admission to hospital (P < 0.05). None of the patients, who re-operated by microdiscectomy, presented with iatrogenic instability in 7 years follow-up period. Conclusion: Microdiscectomy performed through a proper technique in the re-operation of recurrent disc herniations eases complaints and improves the quality of life. Long-term follow-ups are required for more accurate results.

Microsurgical infrapedicular paramedian approach for retrovertebral lumbar disc herniations

2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nedal Hejazi
Keyword(s):  
Facet Joint ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Clinical Benefits ◽  
Disc Herniations ◽  
Fine Print

✓ The author performed a microsurgical infrapedicular paramedian approach in 35 patients (23 men and 12 women) to remove herniated lumbar retrovertebral discs that did not have an apparent origin at either the superior or inferior disc level. The goal of this surgery was to minimize the bone resection, preserve the facet joint, and avoid the risk of secondary vertebral instability. The Macnab outcome classification was used to assess all patients who attended follow-up examination for at least 15 months. The clinical results were excellent or good in 34 (97%) of 35 cases. This minimally invasive lumbar spine technique resulted in minimal morbidity, excellent clinical benefits, and a long-term outcome without evidence of secondary segmental instability.

scholarly journals Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up of Cases with Recurrent Disc Herniation Treated with Microdiscectomy and Posterior Dynamic Transpedicular Stabilisation

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuncay Kaner ◽  
Mehdi Sasani ◽  
Tunc Oktenoglu ◽  
Ahmet Levent Aydin ◽  
Ali Fahir Ozer
Keyword(s):  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Prospective Clinical Study ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Failed Back Syndrome ◽  
Recurrent Disc Herniation ◽  
Rod System ◽  
Disc Herniations ◽  
Vas Scores

The objective of this article is to evaluate two-year clinical and radiological follow-up results for patients who were treated with microdiscectomy and posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilisation (PDTS) due to recurrent disc herniation. This article is a prospective clinical study. We conducted microdiscectomy and PDTS (using a cosmic dynamic screw-rod system) in 40 cases (23 males, 17 females) with a diagnosis of recurrent disc herniation. Mean age of included patients was 48.92 ± 12.18 years (range: 21-73 years). Patients were clinically and radiologically evaluated for follow-up for at least two years. Patients’ postoperative clinical results and radiological outcomes were evaluated during the 3rd, 12th, and 24th months after surgery. Forty patients who underwent microdiscectomy and PDTS were followed for a mean of 41 months (range: 24-63 months). Both the Oswestry and VAS scores showed significant improvements two years postoperatively in comparison to preoperative scores (p<0.01). There were no significant differences between any of the three measured radiological parameters (α, LL, IVS) after two years of follow-up (p > 0.05). New recurrent disc herniations were not observed during follow-up in any of the patients. We observed complications in two patients. Performing microdiscectomy and PDTS after recurrent disc herniation can decrease the risk of postoperative segmental instability. This approach reduces the frequency of failed back syndrome with low back pain and sciatica.

Anterior Lumbar Microdiscectomy and Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Recurrent Disc Herniation

Neurosurgery ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 334-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Giancarlo Vishteh ◽  
Curtis A. Dickman
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Posterior Longitudinal Ligament ◽  
Radicular Pain ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Herniated Disc ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Lumbar Microdiscectomy ◽  
Disc Herniations

Abstract OBJECTIVE To demonstrate the feasibility of anterior lumbar microdiscectomy in patients with recurrent, sequestered lumbar disc herniations. METHODS Between 1997 and 1999, six patients underwent a muscle-sparing “minilaparotomy” approach and subsequent microscopic anterior lumbar microdiscectomy and fragmentectomy for recurrent lumbar disc extrusions at L5–S1 (n = 4) or L4–L5 (n = 2). A contralateral distraction plug permitted ipsilateral discectomy under microscopic magnification. Effective resection of the extruded disc fragments was accomplished by opening the posterior longitudinal ligament. Interbody fusion was performed by placing cylindrical threaded titanium cages (n = 4) or threaded allograft bone dowels (n = 2). RESULTS There were no complications, and blood loss was minimal. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging revealed complete resection of all herniated disc material. Plain x-rays revealed excellent interbody cage position. Radicular pain and neurological deficits resolved in all six patients (mean follow-up, 14 mo). CONCLUSION Anterior lumbar microdiscectomy with interbody fusion provides a viable alternative for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniations. Recurrent herniated disc fragments can be removed completely under direct microscopic visualization, and interbody fusion can be performed in the same setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document