Recurrence and risk factors of posterior communicating artery aneurysms after endovascular treatment

Author(s):  
Min Jeoung Kim ◽  
Joonho Chung ◽  
Keun Young Park ◽  
Dong Joon Kim ◽  
Byung Moon Kim ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Georges Farvacque ◽  
Théophile Guilbaud ◽  
Anderson Dieudonné Loundou ◽  
Ugo Scemamma ◽  
Stéphane Victor Berdah ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. E597-E598
Author(s):  
Maureen A Darwal ◽  
Zakaria Hakma ◽  
Mandy J Binning ◽  
Adam Arthur ◽  
Bain Mark ◽  
...  

Abstract Since the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial,1 endovascular treatment has been the favored treatment for appropriate ruptured intracranial aneurysms. While our endovascular technology has advanced to allow us to treat the majority of intracranial aneurysms, simple coil embolization is still the most common modality. This video demonstrates the fundamentals of aneurysm catheterization and coiling for safe treatment. In addition, the set-up and devices are detailed. This video is to add to the library of basic techniques that will aid a large number of practitioners. This patient consented to endovascular treatment. The video demonstrates endovascular coil embolization of a posterior communicating artery aneurysm in a 76-yr-old female who presented with a subarachnoid hemorrhage. Image of biplane suite in video used courtesy of Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. Illustration at 5:12 reprinted from Yasargil MG, et al, Microneurosurgery IV B, p. 9, Thieme, New York, 1995.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8

OBJECTIVE Craniocervical junction (CCJ) arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are treated using neurosurgical or endovascular options; however, there is still no consensus on the safest and most effective treatment. The present study compared the treatment results of neurosurgical and endovascular procedures for CCJ AVFs, specifically regarding retreatment, complications, and outcomes. METHODS This was a multicenter cohort study authorized by the Neurospinal Society of Japan. Data on consecutive patients with CCJ AVFs who underwent neurosurgical or endovascular treatment between 2009 and 2019 at 29 centers were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the retreatment rate by procedure. Secondary endpoints were the overall complication rate, the ischemic complication rate, the mortality rate, posttreatment changes in the neurological status, independent risk factors for retreatment, and poor outcomes. RESULTS Ninety-seven patients underwent neurosurgical (78 patients) or endovascular (19 patients) treatment. Retreatment rates were 2.6% (2/78 patients) in the neurosurgery group and 63% (12/19 patients) in the endovascular group (p < 0.001). Overall complication rates were 22% and 42% in the neurosurgery and endovascular groups, respectively (p = 0.084). Ischemic complication rates were 7.7% and 26% in the neurosurgery and endovascular groups, respectively (p = 0.037). Ischemic complications included 8 spinal infarctions, 2 brainstem infarctions, and 1 cerebellar infarction, which resulted in permanent neurological deficits. Mortality rates were 2.6% and 0% in the neurosurgery and endovascular groups, respectively (p > 0.99). Two patients died of systemic complications. The percentages of patients with improved modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were 60% and 37% in the neurosurgery and endovascular groups, respectively, with a median follow-up of 23 months (p = 0.043). Multivariate analysis identified endovascular treatment as an independent risk factor associated with retreatment (OR 54, 95% CI 9.9–300; p < 0.001). Independent risk factors associated with poor outcomes (a postoperative mRS score of 3 or greater) were a pretreatment mRS score of 3 or greater (OR 13, 95% CI 2.7–62; p = 0.001) and complications (OR 5.8; 95% CI 1.3–26; p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS Neurosurgical treatment was more effective and safer than endovascular treatment for patients with CCJ AVFs because of lower retreatment and ischemic complication rates and better outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 1357-1364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoyi Peng ◽  
Chuming Huang ◽  
Weiqiang Chen ◽  
Chukai Xu ◽  
Mingfa Liu ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 61 (suppl_5) ◽  
pp. ONSE392-ONSE397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niklaus Krayenbühl ◽  
Ali F. Krisht

Abstract Objective: Cutting the posterior communicating artery (PComA) can improve the neurosurgeon's view and maneuverability while performing surgery within the interpedun-cular fossa. Although mentioned in some reports, its technique and safety have not been studied in detail thus far. Methods: Patients undergoing surgery for vascular and neoplastic lesions in the interpeduncular fossa in which the PComA was cut were retrospectively analyzed regarding the location where the PComA was divided, the size of the PComA in relation to the posterior cerebral artery, and the vascular risk factors. Clinical and radiological outcomes and the related complications were recorded and analyzed. Results: The PComA was divided in 25 patients, and was operated on for vascular (in 23 patients) and neoplastic (in 2 patients) lesions. The PComA was divided at a perforator-free-zone. This zone was most commonly located at the junction of the PComA and the posterior cerebral artery (88% of patients). One patient had delayed postoperative bleeding from the divided PComA stump. There were no ischemic complications either in the territory of the PComA perforator or in the posterior cerebral artery. Conclusion: This is the largest reported experience with dividing the PComA. It shows that this surgical step is safe and that it constitutes an important option to help improve the exposure, maneuverability, and safety of surgery in the region of the interpeduncular fossa.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document