scholarly journals Risk factors of long-term aortic dilatation after endovascular treatment for DeBakey IIIb aortic dissection

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. S116
Author(s):  
W. Ding ◽  
G. Teng ◽  
B. Xie
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Aortic Dilatation

Incidental finding of type A aortic dissection in a paediatric heart transplant recipient

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (09) ◽  
pp. 1219-1221
Author(s):  
Laura D’Addese ◽  
Rukmini Komarlu ◽  
Kenneth Zahka
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Heart Transplantation ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Incidental Finding ◽  
Heart Transplant Recipient ◽  
Orthotopic Heart Transplantation ◽  
Aortic Dilatation ◽  
Size Mismatch ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection

AbstractAortic dissection causes significant morbidity and mortality in adults and treatment guidelines are based on well-documented risk factors. Conversely, dissection after orthotopic heart transplantation is very rare, especially in the absence of infection, hypertension, or donor–recipient aortic size mismatch. Several forms of CHD are associated with aortic dilatation, but the incidence of aortic dissection and aneurysm in children is also low, which makes use of adult guidelines in children challenging. We present a 17-year-old Amish female with a homozygous gene mutation in the MYBPC3 gene known to cause lethal, infantile hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. She underwent orthotopic heart transplantation and then developed an asymptomatic aortic dissection despite no known risk factors.

Long-term Results of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection and Risk Factors for Survival

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 358-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-lin Li ◽  
Yun-jun He ◽  
Xiao-hui Wang ◽  
Yang-yan He ◽  
Zi-heng Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Type B ◽  
Type B Aortic Dissection ◽  
Chronic Patients ◽  
Aneurysmal Dilatation ◽  
Factors Influencing

Purpose: To compare characteristics of acute, subacute, and chronic type B aortic dissection and their influence on long-term results of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Materials and Methods: In a single-center, retrospective cohort study, 314 patients (median age 52 years; 244 men) with acute (n=165), subacute (n=115), or chronic (n=34) type B aortic dissection underwent TEVAR between January 2009 and December 2013. Patient demographics, risk factors, and imaging characteristics were compared among the groups. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify any factors influencing survival. Results: The acute and subacute patients exhibited more complications at presentation than chronic patients. However, the chronic patients exhibited more aneurysmal dilatation (p<0.001) and true lumen collapse (p<0.001). Over a mean follow-up of 68.1±22.9 months (range 2–108), subacute patients showed a lower reintervention rate (3.6% vs 12.1% vs 12.1%, p=0.045), a lower major complication rate (14.4% vs 33.1% vs 27.3%, p=0.002), and better cumulative overall survival (p=0.03) than the acute and chronic groups, respectively. Furthermore, acute patients developed more stent-graft–induced distal erosion (p=0.017) and retrograde type A dissection (RTAD) (p=0.036), whereas chronic patients had less aortic remodeling in the stented segment (p<0.001), distal thoracic aorta (p<0.001), and abdominal aorta (p=0.047). Finally, multivariable analysis demonstrated age >52 years, visceral malperfusion, and RTAD as independent factors influencing overall survival; aneurysmal dilatation, rupture/impending rupture, and RTAD were independent factors influencing aorta-specific survival. Conclusion: Acute and subacute patients had increased risks of rupture and complications at presentation, whereas chronic patients had increased risks for aneurysmal dilatation. From a long-term perspective, the subacute phase might be an optimal time for TEVAR in cases of type B aortic dissection that do not need emergent interventions. The risk factors influencing survival should be identified, carefully managed, and possibly prevented.

scholarly journals Incidence and Outcome of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Aortic Dissection and Risk Factor Control

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fang Liu ◽  
Si-Chong Qian ◽  
Shuai Jing ◽  
Zhe Wang ◽  
Xin-Chun Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Current Smoker ◽  
Long Term Outcomes

Background and Aims: The contradiction of management modality between acute myocardial infarction(AMI) and aortic dissection(AD) may result in clinical catastrophe. Data on risk factors, incidence, and outcome of AD and AMI are limited, and there have been no studies on the long-term outcomes of AMI in patients with AD. So we aimed to investigate long-term outcomes after AMI in patients with AD, and propose a useful diagnostic paradigm.Methods: Consecutively enrolled patients with AD and AMI who were referred to our center from 2010 to 2017. Baseline patient characteristics, risk factors, all medical treatments, echocardiographic parameters, laboratory data, and treatment were recorded. All patients were followed up from the first hospitalization until a first heart event, death, or 17 March, 2018.Results: 0.13% in AMI and 7.49% in AD patients had a concomitant diagnosis of AD and AMI. The average patient age was 53.3 ± 12.1 years and 84.6% were male. The most prevalent vascular risk factors were hypertension (69.2%) and current smoker (64.1%). Of all the 39 patients, 66.7% were managed surgically. Overall in-hospital mortality was 10.3%. The 30-day and 5-year fatality rates were 23.1% and 35.9%, but were higher for female than for male (66.7 vs. 30.3%, log-rank P = 0.045) on 5-year mortality. The overall survival of females was inferior to the males (log-rank P = 0.045).Conclusions: Patients with AMI and AD exhibit high 5-year fatality rates. For these patients, surgical management tends to have lower mortality. Improved management of hypertension and smoking, may reduce future incidence rates.

Aortic dissection in children and adolescents with Turner syndrome: risk factors and management recommendations

2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (7) ◽  
pp. 662-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
E J Turtle ◽  
A A Sule ◽  
D J Webb ◽  
L E Bath
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Turner Syndrome ◽  
Heart Defects ◽  
Childhood And Adolescence ◽  
Aortic Dilatation ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Management Recommendations

There is a general lack of awareness of the risk of aortic dissection in Turner syndrome (TS) from both patients with TS and their physicians. Patients often ignore symptoms for up to 24 h before seeking medical advice, significantly increasing their risk of death. A clinical profile of those at risk of dissection is emerging and includes the presence of congenital heart defects, aortic dilatation and hypertension. MRI has revolutionised the visualisation of cardiovascular anatomy in TS but remains underutilised, especially in children and adolescents, and there is currently little guidance on blood pressure (BP) assessment or hypertension management. Children and adolescents with TS at risk of dissection could be easily identified by timely imaging and BP assessment. This would allow medical management or surgical intervention to be put in place to reduce the risk of this major, and often fatal, complication. Since guidance is lacking, we have reviewed the literature on the risk factors for dissection in TS during childhood and adolescence, and make recommendations on the assessment and management of these patients.

scholarly journals Extensive aortic surgery in acute aortic dissection type A on outcome – insights from 25 years single center experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bashar Dib ◽  
Philipp Christian Seppelt ◽  
Rawa Arif ◽  
Alexander Weymann ◽  
Gábor Veres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Acute Aortic Dissection ◽  
Circulatory Arrest ◽  
Early Mortality ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Per Se ◽  
Aortic Dissection Type A

Abstract Background This single center study compares the different surgical techniques used in the treatment of acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) analyzing the influence of the extent of the surgical approach on outcome. Methods From 1988 to 2012, 407 patients were operated for AADA. The cohort was divided into subgroups according to the surgical approach. These groups were compared with the supracommissural replacement group (SCR; n = 141). Groups included aortic valve sparing techniques (AVS; n = 29), Composite replacement (COMP; n = 119), COMP with total arch replacement (COMP+TAR; n = 27) and SCR with TAR (n = 75). Results Compared to SCR alone, operation (p = 0.005), bypass-, cross-clamp and circulatory arrest times were longer in SCR + TAR (all p < 0.001). Moreover, operation, bypass and cross clamp times were longer in COMP+TAR (p = 0.003, p = 0.002 and p < 0.001 respectively). COMP alone and AVS required longer cross-clamp time, too (p < 0,001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Overall 30-day mortality was 21% with the observed lowest rate after AVS (14%, SCR 18%, COMP 25%) but differences in 30-day mortality were not statistically significant. The estimated 10-year survival was 42%, especially AVS demonstrated a good 10-year survival (69%). David technique was superior to Yacoub technique concerning incidence of redo interventions (p = 0.036). Risk factors for early mortality included age, circulatory arrest, general malperfusion, bypass and operation time. Circulatory arrest per se was revealed as risk factor for long-term survival. Conclusions Within our single center retrospective study concomitant aortic root repair or aortic arch replacement for AADA demonstrated acceptable early and long-term survival. Circulatory arrest, long bypass and operation times per se might be important risk factors for early mortality. AVS techniques can be performed safely and have good outcomes in acute aortic dissection repair.

scholarly journals Characteristics and outcomes of Stanford type A aortic dissection patients with severe post-operation hyperbilirubinemia: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaolan Chen ◽  
Ming Bai ◽  
Lijuan Zhao ◽  
Yangping Li ◽  
Yan Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Type A ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Post Operation

Abstract Background: Hyperbilirubinemia is one of the common complications after cardiac surgery and is associated with increased mortality. However, to the best of our knowledge, the reports on clinical significance of postoperative severe hyperbilirubinemia in Stanford type A aortic dissection (AAD) patients were limited. Methods: Patients who underwent surgical treatment for AAD in our center between January 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively screened. In-hospital mortality, long-term mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), and the requirement of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) were assessed as endpoints. Univariate and multivariate regression models were employed to identify the risk factors of these endpoints. Results: After screening, 271 patients were included in our present study. Of the included patients, 222 (81.9%) experienced postoperative AKI, and 50 (18.5%) received CRRT. The in-hospital mortality was 30.3%. The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year cumulative mortality were 32.9%, 33.9%, and 35.3%, respectively. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated that age (P < 0.033), AKI stage 3 (P < 0.001), the amount of blood transfusion after surgery (P = 0.019), mean arterial pressure (MAP) in the first postoperative day (P = 0.012), the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (P = 0.02), and the peak total bilirubin (TB) concentration (P = 0.023) were independent risk factors of in-hospital mortality. The optimal cut-off value of peak TB on predicting in-hospital mortality was 121.2 μmol/L. Patients with post-operation TB ≥ 121 μmol/L was associated with worse long-term survival as well. Conclusions: Severe post-operation hyperbilirubinemia is a common clinical situation in patients had AAD repair. In AAD patients with severe post-operation hyperbilirubinemia, older age, lower MAP, increased blood transfusion, stage 3 AKI, the use of ECMO, and the increased peak TB lead to increase in-hospital mortality.

scholarly journals Independent Risk Factors and The Long-term Outcomes for Postoperative Continuous Renal Replacement Treatment in Patients Who Underwent Emergency Surgery for Type A Acute Aortic Dissection

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhigang Wang ◽  
Min Ge ◽  
Tao Chen ◽  
Cheng Chen ◽  
Qiuyan Zong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
Acute Aortic Dissection ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Independent Risk Factors

Abstract Objective: The study objective was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in patients undergoing emergency surgery for type A acute aortic dissection (TA-AAD) and evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes. Methods: From January 2014 to December 2018, 712 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. These patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not needed postoperative CRRT: the CRRT group vs the control group. Univariate analysis and binary logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the risk factors of CRRT. To avoid the selection bias and confounders, baseline characteristics were matched for propensity scores. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to provide survival estimates at postoperative points in time. Results: Before propensity score matching, univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in age, preoperative hypertension, pericardial effusion, preoperative serum creatinine (sCr), intraoperative need for combined coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or mitral valve or tricuspid valve surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, extracorporeal circulation assistant time, aortic cross-clamp time, drainage volume 24 hours after surgery and ventilator time between two groups. All were higher in the CRRT group (P <0.05). These risk factors were included in binary logistic regression. It showed that preoperative sCr and CPB time were independent risk factors for CRRT patients undergoing surgery for TA-AAD. And there were significant differences regarding 30-day mortality (P <0.001) and long-term overall cumulative survival (P <0.001) with up to a 6-year follow-up. After propensity scoring, 29 pairs (58 patients) were successfully matched. Among these patients, the analysis showed that CPB time was still significantly longer in the CRRT group (P = 0.004), and the 30-day mortality rate was also higher in this group (44.8% vs 10.3%; P = 0.003). Conclusion: CRRT after TA-AAD is common and worsened short- and long- term mortality. The preoperative sCr and CPB time are independent risk factors for postoperative CRRT patients. Shorten the CPB time as much as possible is recommended to reduce the risk of CRRT after the operation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document