Management of pyogenic hepatic abscesses (PHA) varies among surgeons and institutions. Recent studies have advocated for first-line percutaneous drainage (PD) of all accessible hepatic abscesses, with surgery reserved as rescue only. Our study aimed to internally validate an established multimodal algorithm for PHA at a high-volume hepatopancreatobiliary center. Patients treated by the hepatopancreatobiliary service for PHA were retrospectively reviewed from 2008 through 2018. The algorithm defined intended first-line treatment as antibiotics for type I abscesses (<3 cm), PD for type II (≥3, unilocular), and surgical intervention (minimally invasive drainage or resection, when possible) for type III (≥3 cm, multilocular). Outcomes were compared between patients who received first-line treatment following the algorithm versus alternate therapy. Of 330 patients with PHA, 201 met inclusion criteria. Type III abscesses had significantly lower failure following algorithmic approach with surgery compared with PD (4% vs 28%, P = 0.018). Type II abscesses failed first-line PD in 27 per cent (13/48) with 11 patients requiring surgical rescue, whereas first-line surgery failed in only 13 per cent (2/15). No deaths occurred after any surgical intervention, and there was no statistical difference in major complications between first-line surgical intervention and PD for type II or III abscesses. These results support the algorithmic approach and demonstrate that minimally invasive surgical intervention is a safe and effective modality for large PHA. We recommend that select patients with large, complex abscesses should be considered for a first-line minimally invasive surgical approach depending on surgical experience and available resources.
Open surgery as first-line treatment in patients with hemorrhagic type III and IV DAVFs: how much anachronism do we need in modern medicine?