Andropogon gayanus (Gamba Grass) Invasion Increases Fire-mediated Nitrogen Losses in the Tropical Savannas of Northern Australia

Ecosystems ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. A. Rossiter-Rachor ◽  
S. A. Setterfield ◽  
M. M. Douglas ◽  
L. B. Hutley ◽  
G. D. Cook
2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie A. Rossiter ◽  
Samantha A. Setterfield ◽  
Michael M. Douglas ◽  
Lindsay B. Hutley

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Legge ◽  
Stephen Murphy ◽  
Joanne Heathcote ◽  
Emma Flaxman ◽  
John Augusteyn ◽  
...  

We report the effects of an extensive (>7000 km2), high-intensity late-dry-season fire in the central Kimberley, Western Australia, on the species richness and abundance of mammals, reptiles and birds. Five weeks after the fire we surveyed 12 sites (six burnt, six unburnt); each pair of sites was closely matched for soil type and vegetation. The species richness and abundance of mammals and reptiles was greater at unburnt sites, especially for mammals (with a 4-fold difference in abundance between burnt and unburnt sites). There was an indication that reptiles immigrated into unburnt patches, but mammals did not. There were also species-specific responses to the fire: Rattus tunneyi and Pseudomys nanus were much more abundant in unburnt sites, whereas Pseudomys delicatulus was caught in equal numbers at burnt and unburnt sites. Diurnal reptiles were more abundant at unburnt sites, but nocturnal reptiles were equally common at burnt and unburnt sites. Avian species richness and overall abundance was similar between burnt and unburnt patches, although a few species showed preferences for one state or the other. The overall high trapping success for mammals (18% across all sites; 28% in unburnt patches) contrasts with the well documented mammal collapse in parts of northern Australia and seems paradoxical given that our study area has experienced the same increase in fire frequency and extent that is often blamed for species collapse. However, our study area has fewer pressures from other sources, including grazing by large herbivores, suggesting that the effects of these pressures, and their interaction with fire, may have been underestimated in previous studies.


2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Kean ◽  
Owen Price

Mission grasses Pennisetum polystachion (L.) Schult. and P. pedicellatum (Trin) and Gamba Grass Andropogon gayanus (Kunth) are three weed species that are thought to be spreading rapidly in the vicinity of Darwin and may pose a major threat to ecosystems in northern Australia. The distribution of the species was assessed from a vehicle along 913 km of roads near Darwin. The study provided data on the potential source of further spread and an analysis of the potential habitat of the weeds. For analysis, roadsides were divided up into 200 m cells and the distributions of the grasses were compared against land tenure and broad land unit maps, Mission grasses were present in approximately 52% of cells, and were particularly common around the rural residential/horticultural area of Humpty Doo. They occurred equally commonly in all broad land units, but differed among tenures, being particularly common on freehold land. Gamba Grass occurred in 15% of cells, with hot spots in a number of areas. It was most common on freehold land, and was rare on conservation reserves. It also showed an association with broad land units reflecting wetter areas. Mission grasses are so widespread in the Darwin region that control can only be contemplated in very small areas requiring frequent treatment of re-invading plants. It may be possible to control Gamba Grass in conservation reserves and Crown land if prompt action is taken. For all three species, preventing their spread to new areas should be a high priority.


Fire Ecology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia L. J. Oliveira ◽  
Manuel L. Campagnolo ◽  
Owen F. Price ◽  
Andrew C. Edwards ◽  
Jeremy Russell-Smith ◽  
...  

Ecosystems ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 503-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna E. Richards ◽  
Garry D. Cook ◽  
Brian T. Lynch

2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 391 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Williams ◽  
J. C. Z. Woinarski ◽  
A. N. Andersen

The management of fire in savannas has been informed by a strong tradition of fire experiments, especially in Africa. This research tradition is much shorter in the 2 million square kilometres of tropical savannas in northern Australia, but has yielded several natural experiments, and three designed, manipulative, controlled field experiments (hereafter 'manipulative' experiments) of international significance (at Munmarlary, Kapalga and Kidman Springs in the Northern Territory). Here we assess the contributions of experiments, in particular the manipulative experiments, to ecological understanding and biodiversity management in Australia's savannas. Running from 1973 to 1996, the Munmarlary experiment comprised hectare-scale experimental plots with four replicated dry season fire treatments, and was designed to examine interactions between fire, landscape and biodiversity. The Kapalga experiment ran from 1989 to 1995, with a range of fire treatments broadly similar to those at Munmarlary. However, experimental units were 10–20�km2 sub-catchments, making it one of the largest, replicated fire experiments ever conducted. The Kidman Springs experiment focused on grass-layer productivity and composition to meet the needs of the pastoral industry, but also provided an opportunity to examine biodiversity responses to different fire regimes. Methodologically, the experiments have generally focused on phenomena—the responses to different fire treatments of individual taxa—rather than on mechanisms that determine response syndromes. They have highlighted that a range of responses to differences in fire regime is possible, and that no single fire regime can optimise all biodiversity outcomes. For effective conservation of biodiversity in the face of such complexity, conservation goals will need to be made explicit. The existing portfolio of manipulative experiments is incomplete, lacking especially a consideration of some critical savanna taxa and environments, and providing little information on the significance of spatial and temporal variability in fire patterns, especially at small scales. An understanding of fire in Australian savanna landscapes remains inadequate, so there is a continuing need for close partnerships between scientists and conservation managers, with fire management treated as a series of landscape experiments in an adaptive management framework.


2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia L. J. Oliveira ◽  
M. A. Amaral Turkman ◽  
José M. C. Pereira

We characterised fire frequency in western Arnhem Land, northern Australia (~24 000 km2), during the period 1990–2008, using available satellite burnt area maps. We estimated fire mortality and fire survival distributions, and hazard functions by vegetation type. We tested the performance of three probability models to study fire interval distributions: continuous and discrete Weibull, and discrete lognormal. Over the 19 year study period the mean annual area burnt was 36%. Median fire intervals ranged from 1 to 4 years. The discrete lognormal model best fitted the data, yielding non-monotonic hazard functions that peak at 2 to 3 years, making it more appropriate for fire frequency analysis in fire-prone tropical savannas than the more popular Weibull model. Open forest showed the highest flammability dependence on fuel age, and closed forest the lowest. The probability of burning as a function of time since last fire reaches an early peak and subsequently declines, due to fuel dynamics in these flammable savanna systems. Age-specific fire incidence is much higher for older vegetation patches than was suggested by earlier analysis of fire interval distributions. Fitting an appropriate model is important to characterize the observed fire frequency patterns, and make inferences for unobserved, longer fire intervals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document