The effect of conventional mechanical periodontal treatment on red complex microorganisms and clinical parameters in Down syndrome periodontitis patients: a pilot study

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 601-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Tanaka ◽  
T. O. Rodrigues ◽  
L. S. Finoti ◽  
S. R. L. Teixeira ◽  
M. P. A. Mayer ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 97 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. A490-A491 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Bargagna ◽  
M. Bozza ◽  
G. Purpura ◽  
T. Luongo

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Titilayo Tatiana Agbadje ◽  
Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi ◽  
Mélissa Côté ◽  
Andrée-Anne Tremblay ◽  
Mariama Penda Diallo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To help pregnant women and their partners make informed value-congruent decisions about Down syndrome prenatal screening, our team developed two successive versions of a decision aid (DAv2017 and DAv2014). We aimed to assess pregnant women and their partners’ perceptions of the usefulness of the two DAs for preparing for decision making, their relative acceptability and their most desirable features. Methods This is a mixed methods pilot study. We recruited participants of study (women and their partners) when consulting for prenatal care in three clinical sites in Quebec City. To be eligible, women had to: (a) be at least 18 years old; (b) be more than 16 weeks pregnant; or having given birth in the previous year and (c) be able to speak and write in French or English. Both women and partners were invited to give their informed consent. We collected quantitative data on the usefulness of the DAs for preparing for decision making and their relative acceptability. We developed an interview grid based on the Technology Acceptance Model and Acceptability questionnaire to explore their perceptions of the most desirable features. We performed descriptive statistics and deductive analysis. Results Overall, 23 couples and 16 individual women participated in the study. The majority of participants were between 25 and 34 years old (79% of women and 59% of partners) and highly educated (66.7% of women and 54% of partners had a university-level education). DAv2017 scored higher for usefulness for preparing for decision making (86.2 ± 13 out of 100 for DAv2017 and 77.7 ± 14 for DAv2014). For most dimensions, DAv2017 was more acceptable than DAv2014 (e.g. the amount of information was found “just right” by 80% of participants for DAv2017 against 56% for DAv2014). However, participants preferred the presentation and the values clarification exercise of DAv2014. In their opinion, neither DA presented information in a completely balanced manner. They suggested adding more information about raising Down syndrome children, replacing frequencies with percentages, different values clarification methods, and a section for the partner. Conclusions A new user-centered version of the prenatal screening DA will integrate participants’ suggestions to reflect end users’ priorities.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e0158339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Ferreira ◽  
Raphaella Coelho Michel ◽  
Sebastião Luiz Aguiar Greghi ◽  
Maria Lúcia Rubo de Resende ◽  
Adriana Campos Passanezi Sant’Ana ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 681-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fábio Vidal ◽  
Ivan Cordovil ◽  
Carlos Marcelo Silva Figueredo ◽  
Ricardo Guimarães Fischer

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1977-1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabiana Martins ◽  
Alyne Simões ◽  
Marcio Oliveira ◽  
Ana Claudia Luiz ◽  
Marina Gallottini ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document