Desirable features in a decision aid for prenatal screening – what do pregnant women and their partners think? A mixed methods pilot study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Titilayo Tatiana Agbadje ◽  
Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi ◽  
Mélissa Côté ◽  
Andrée-Anne Tremblay ◽  
Mariama Penda Diallo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Technology Acceptance ◽  
Decision Aid ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Values Clarification ◽  
Quebec City

Abstract Background To help pregnant women and their partners make informed value-congruent decisions about Down syndrome prenatal screening, our team developed two successive versions of a decision aid (DAv2017 and DAv2014). We aimed to assess pregnant women and their partners’ perceptions of the usefulness of the two DAs for preparing for decision making, their relative acceptability and their most desirable features. Methods This is a mixed methods pilot study. We recruited participants of study (women and their partners) when consulting for prenatal care in three clinical sites in Quebec City. To be eligible, women had to: (a) be at least 18 years old; (b) be more than 16 weeks pregnant; or having given birth in the previous year and (c) be able to speak and write in French or English. Both women and partners were invited to give their informed consent. We collected quantitative data on the usefulness of the DAs for preparing for decision making and their relative acceptability. We developed an interview grid based on the Technology Acceptance Model and Acceptability questionnaire to explore their perceptions of the most desirable features. We performed descriptive statistics and deductive analysis. Results Overall, 23 couples and 16 individual women participated in the study. The majority of participants were between 25 and 34 years old (79% of women and 59% of partners) and highly educated (66.7% of women and 54% of partners had a university-level education). DAv2017 scored higher for usefulness for preparing for decision making (86.2 ± 13 out of 100 for DAv2017 and 77.7 ± 14 for DAv2014). For most dimensions, DAv2017 was more acceptable than DAv2014 (e.g. the amount of information was found “just right” by 80% of participants for DAv2017 against 56% for DAv2014). However, participants preferred the presentation and the values clarification exercise of DAv2014. In their opinion, neither DA presented information in a completely balanced manner. They suggested adding more information about raising Down syndrome children, replacing frequencies with percentages, different values clarification methods, and a section for the partner. Conclusions A new user-centered version of the prenatal screening DA will integrate participants’ suggestions to reflect end users’ priorities.

Web-based Training for Nurses on Shared Decision-Making and Prenatal Screening for Down Syndrome: a Controlled Trial (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Poulin Herron ◽  
Titilayo Tatiana Agbadje ◽  
Sabrina Guay-Bélanger ◽  
Gérard Ngueta ◽  
Geneviève Roch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Training Program ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Intention To Use ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Web Based

BACKGROUND Background: Nurses provide maternity care and thus play an important role in supporting pregnant women making decisions about prenatal screening for Down syndrome. We developed a web-based shared decision making (SDM) training program for health professionals focusing on Down syndrome screening decisions. OBJECTIVE Objective: We assessed the impact of a SDM training program on nurses’ intention to use a decision aid with pregnant women deciding about prenatal screening for Down syndrome. METHODS Methods: In this 2-arm parallel controlled trial, French-speaking nurses working with pregnant women in the province of Quebec were recruited online by a private survey firm. They were conveniently allocated either to the intervention group (web-based SDM training program that included prenatal screening) or to the control group (web-based training program focusing on prenatal screening alone, with no SDM content). The primary outcome was intention to use a decision aid. Secondary outcomes were psychosocial variables of intention (e.g. social influence), as well as knowledge, satisfaction, acceptability, perceived usefulness and reaction to the pedagogical approach. All outcomes were self-assessed through online questionnaires including space for written comments. No blinding was performed. We used Student's t test and Fisher's exact test to compare continuous and categorical variables between groups. RESULTS Results: Of 57 participants assessed for eligibility, 40 were allocated to the intervention (n=20) or control group (n=20) and 36 (n=18 in each) completed the training program. Mean age of participants was 41 years (SD 9). Most were women (97.5%), Caucasian (95%), clinical nurses (70%), and had completed a baccalaureate degree (65%). Post-intervention, the mean score of intention was 6.3 (5.9; 6.7) for the intervention group and 6.0 (5.42; 6.64) for the control group. The difference in intention score and other psychosocial variables score between groups was not statistically significant. Knowledge scores about SDM were significantly different (79% in the intervention group, 64% in the control group, p=0.009). There was no significant difference in overall satisfaction [4.4 (SD 0.7) in the intervention group and 4.5 (SD 0.9)] in the control group and perceived usefulness [4.6 (SD 0.4) in the intervention group and 4.4 (SD 0.5)] in the control group. Acceptability of the training program showed a statistically significant difference [4.6 (SD 0.4) in the intervention group and 4.3 (SD 0.4) in the control group; p=0.02] as well as reaction to the pedagogical approach [4.7 (SD 0.4) in the intervention group and 4.4 (SD 0.4) in the control group; p=0.02]. Seventeen participants also gave written comments on the training. CONCLUSIONS Conclusions: Nurses’ intention to use SDM in prenatal care is already high, with training or without, but their knowledge about SDM could be improved with SDM training. Our results will inform future strategies to implement shared decision-making among nurses. CLINICALTRIAL Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04162288; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04162288?term=NCT04162288&draw=2&rank=1

scholarly journals Use of a patient decision aid for prenatal screening for Down syndrome: what do pregnant women say?

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Esther Leiva Portocarrero ◽  
Anik M. C. Giguère ◽  
Johanie Lépine ◽  
Mirjam M. Garvelink ◽  
Hubert Robitaille ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Decision Aid ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Patient Decision Aid ◽  
Patient Decision

Evaluating a Web-Based Training Program for Nurses on Shared Decision-Making and Screening for Down Syndrome: Protocol for a Randomized Control Trial (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Poulin Herron ◽  
Titilayo Tatiana Agbadjé ◽  
Mélissa Côté ◽  
Codjo-Djignefa Djade ◽  
Geneviève Roch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Training Program ◽  
Decision Aid ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Intention To Use ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Web Based ◽  
The Impact

BACKGROUND Pregnant women have difficulty choosing from amongst the wide variety of available prenatal screening options. To help pregnant women and their partners make informed decisions based on their values, needs, and preferences, a decision aid (DA) and a web-based shared decision making (SDM) training program for health professionals have been developed. In Canada, nurses have responsibilities regarding maternity care and thus the potential to do decision coaching on prenatal screening. However, there is a gap of knowledge concerning the effectiveness of SDM interventions in this area of nursing practice. OBJECTIVE This study aims to assess the impact of an SDM training program on nurses’ intention to use a decision aid for prenatal screening as well as their knowledge and overall appreciation of the training. METHODS This is a two-arm parallel randomized trial. Nurses working with pregnant women from the province of Quebec, and speaking in French, will be recruited online by a private survey firm. They will be randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to either an experimental group, which will complete a web-based SDM training program for prenatal screening, or to a control group, which will complete a web-based training program focusing on prenatal screening alone. The experimental intervention consists of a three hour web-based and fully automated training activity hosted on the University Laval platform and has four modules: 1) SDM; 2) Down syndrome prenatal screening; 3) DA; and 4) Communication between healthcare professionals and the patient. For the control group, the topic of SDM in Module 1 has been replaced with “Context and history of prenatal screening” and the topic of DA in Module 3 has been replaced with “Consent in prenatal screening.” In addition to sociodemographic questions using a self-administered questionnaire with closed ended questions, we will assess 1) intention to use a DA in prenatal screening clinical practice; 2) knowledge; 3) satisfaction with the training; 4) acceptability; and 5) perceived usefulness. The randomization will be done by a predetermined sequence and include 36 nurses. Participants and researchers will be blinded. Intention to use DA will be assessed by a Student t test and bivariate and multivariate analysis will be performed to assess knowledge and overall appreciation of the training. RESULTS This study is ongoing and results will be available at the end of 2020 CONCLUSIONS This study results will inform on the impact of an SDM training program on nurses’ intention to use a decision aid for prenatal screening as well as their knowledge and overall appreciation of the training. It will also provide feedback on ways to upgrade the SDM training program, if needed. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04162288

Evaluation of a prenatal screening decision aid: A mixed methods pilot study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Titilayo Tatiana Agbadje ◽  
Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi ◽  
Mélissa Côté ◽  
Andrée-Anne Tremblay ◽  
Mariama Penda Diallo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Decision Aid ◽  
Prenatal Screening

scholarly journals A Shared Decision-Making Toolkit for Mode of Birth After Cesarean

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-49
Author(s):  
Somphit Chinkam ◽  
Courtney Steer-Massaro ◽  
Karla Damus ◽  
Brett Shorten ◽  
Allison Shorten
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Decision Aid ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Racially Diverse ◽  
Provider Perspectives ◽  
Mode Of Birth ◽  
Women's Knowledge

This study evaluated a shared decision-making (SDM) Toolkit (decision aid, counseling guide, and provider scripts) designed to prepare and engage racially diverse women in shared decision-making discussions about the mode of birth after cesarean. The pilot study, involving 27 pregnant women and 63 prenatal providers, assessed women's knowledge, preferences, and satisfaction with decision making, as well as provider perspectives on the Toolkit's acceptability. Most women experienced knowledge improvement, felt more in control and that providers listened to their concerns and supported them. Providers reported that the Toolkit helped women understand their options and supported their counseling. The SDM Toolkit could be used to help women and providers improve their SDM regarding mode of birth after cesarean.

scholarly journals Theory-based approach to developing an implementation plan to support the adoption of a patient decision aid for Down syndrome prenatal screening

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Titilayo Tatiana Agbadjé ◽  
Matthew Menear ◽  
Marie-Pierre Gagnon ◽  
France Légaré
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Care ◽  
Knowledge Translation ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Decision Aid ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Clinical Implementation ◽  
Implementation Plan ◽  
Translation Strategies ◽  
Knowledge To Action ◽  
Knowledge Translation Strategies

Abstract Background Our team has developed a decision aid to help pregnant women and their partners make informed decisions about Down syndrome prenatal screening. However, the decision aid is not yet widely available in Quebec’s prenatal care pathways. Objective We sought to identify knowledge translation strategies and develop an implementation plan to promote the use of the decision aid in prenatal care services in Quebec, Canada. Methods Guided by the Knowledge-to-Action Framework and the Theoretical Domains Framework, we performed a synthesis of our research (11 publications) on prenatal screening in Quebec and on the decision aid. Two authors independently reviewed the 11 articles, extracted information, and mapped it onto the Knowledge-to-Action framework. Using participatory action research methods, we then recruited pregnant women, health professionals, managers of three prenatal care services, and researchers to (a) identify the different clinical pathways followed by pregnant women and (b) select knowledge translation strategies for a clinical implementation plan. Then, based on all the information gathered, the authors established a consensus on strategies to include in the plan. Results Our knowledge synthesis showed that pregnant women and their partners are not sufficiently involved in the decision-making process about prenatal screening and that there are numerous barriers and facilitators of the use of the decision aid in clinical practice (e.g., low intention to use it among health providers). Using a participatory action approach, we met with five pregnant women, three managers, and six health professionals. They informed us about three of Quebec’s prenatal care pathways and helped us identify 20 knowledge translation strategies (e.g., nurse discusses decision aid with women before they meet the doctor) to include in a clinical implementation plan. The research team reached a consensus about the clinical plan and also about broader organizational strategies, such as training healthcare providers in the use of the decision aid, monitoring its impact (e.g., measure decisional conflict) and sustaining its use (e.g., engage key stakeholders in the implementation process). Conclusion Next steps are to pilot our implementation plan while further identifying global strategies that target institutional, policy, and systemic supports for implementation.

scholarly journals Routinization of prenatal screening with the non-invasive prenatal test: pregnant women’s perspectives

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karuna R. M. van der Meij ◽  
Annabel Njio ◽  
Linda Martin ◽  
Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal ◽  
Mireille N. Bekker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Informed Choice ◽  
Aneuploidy Screening ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Fetal Aneuploidy ◽  
Societal Pressure ◽  
Prenatal Test

AbstractDue to the favorable test characteristics of the non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) in the screening of fetal aneuploidy, there has been a strong and growing demand for implementation. In the Netherlands, NIPT is offered within a governmentally supported screening program as a first-tier screening test for all pregnant women (TRIDENT-2 study). However, concerns have been raised that the test’s favorable characteristics might lead to uncritical use, also referred to as routinization. This study addresses women’s perspectives on prenatal screening with NIPT by evaluating three aspects related to routinization: informed choice, freedom to choose and (personal and societal) perspectives on Down syndrome. Nationwide, a questionnaire was completed by 751 pregnant women after receiving counseling for prenatal screening. Of the respondents, the majority (75.5%) made an informed choice for prenatal screening as measured by the multidimensional measure of informed choice (MMIC). Education level and religious affiliation were significant predictors of informed choice. The main reason to accept screening was “seeking reassurance” (25.5%), and the main reason to decline was “every child is welcome” (30.6%). The majority of respondents (87.7%) did not perceive societal pressure to test. Differences between test-acceptors and test-decliners in personal and societal perspectives on Down syndrome were found. Our study revealed high rates of informed decision-making and perceived freedom to choose regarding fetal aneuploidy screening, suggesting that there is little reason for concern about routinization of NIPT based on the perspectives of Dutch pregnant women. Our findings highlight the importance of responsible implementation of NIPT within a national screening program.

scholarly journals Impact of Race and Sex on Pain Management by Medical Trainees: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study of Decision Making and Awareness of Influence

Pain Medicine ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 280-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole A. Hollingshead ◽  
Marianne S. Matthias ◽  
Matthew J. Bair ◽  
Adam T. Hirsh
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Medical Trainees

scholarly journals Health literacy in pregnant women facing prenatal screening may explain their intention to use a patient decision aid: a short report

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agathe Delanoë ◽  
Johanie Lépine ◽  
Maria Esther Leiva Portocarrero ◽  
Hubert Robitaille ◽  
Stéphane Turcotte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Literacy ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Decision Aid ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Intention To Use ◽  
Short Report ◽  
Patient Decision Aid ◽  
Patient Decision

scholarly journals Experts' views on the implementation of the prenatal screening decision aid in Iran: A qualitative study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Razieh Zahedi ◽  
Leila Nemati-Anaraki ◽  
Shahram Sedghi ◽  
Mamak Shariat
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Decision Aid ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Decision Aids ◽  
Personal Factors ◽  
Snowball Sampling ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Patient Decision Aids ◽  
Patient Decision

Background & Aim: Patient decision aids are detailed and personalized health education materials that assist patients in decision making. According to expert viewpoints, this study aimed to determine important factors in implementing the prenatal screening decision aid in Iran. Methods & Materials: In this qualitative study, 24 experts, including seven obstetricians, four information scientists, five managers or policymakers, and eight midwives, were selected using purposive and snowball sampling approaches. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect the data between January 2020 and June 2020 in Tehran, Iran. A prenatal screening decision aid was presented to the participants, and we asked them to raise their concerns and thoughts regarding the factors influencing the implementation of patient decision aids. We used MAXQDA 10 and applied conventional content analysis for data analysis. Results: Two organizational and personal factors themes were identified to implement Iran's prenatal screening decision aids. Conclusion: We identified the viewpoints of experts regarding major factors in patient decision aids implementation for prenatal screening. Before implementing prenatal screening decision aids in Iran, it would be helpful to consider these organizational and personal factors. Prenatal screening decision aids can provide better information for pregnant women and strengthen their decision-making ability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document