scholarly journals Correction to: Developing real-world comparators for clinical trials in chemotherapy-refractory patients with gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 142-142
Author(s):  
Ian Chau ◽  
Dung T. Le ◽  
Patrick A. Ott ◽  
Beata Korytowsky ◽  
Hannah Le ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Real World ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer

ping real-world comparators for

scholarly journals Developing real-world comparators for clinical trials in chemotherapy-refractory patients with gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Chau ◽  
Dung T. Le ◽  
Patrick A. Ott ◽  
Beata Korytowsky ◽  
Hannah Le ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Real World ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Background There are few third-line or later (3L+) treatment options for advanced/metastatic (adv/met) gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancers (GC/GEJC). 3L+ Nivolumab demonstrated encouraging results in Asian patients in the ATTRACTION-2 study compared with placebo (12-month survival, 26% vs 11%), and in Western patients in the single-arm CheckMate 032 study (12-month survival, 44%). This analysis aimed to establish comparator cohorts of US patients receiving routine care in real-world (RW) clinical practice. Methods A 2-step matching process generated RW cohorts from Flatiron Health’s oncology database (January 1, 2011–April 30, 2017), for comparison with each trial: (1) clinical trial eligibility criteria were applied; (2) patients were frequency-matched with trial arms for baseline variables significantly associated with survival. Median overall survival (OS) was calculated by Kaplan–Meier analysis from last treatment until death. Results Of 742 adv/met GC/GEJC patients with at least 2 prior lines of therapy, matching generated 90 US RW ATTRACTION-2-matched patients (median OS: 3.5 months) versus 163 ATTRACTION-2 placebo patients (median OS: 4.1 months), and 100 US RW CheckMate 032-matched patients (median OS: 2.9 months) versus 42 CheckMate 032 nivolumab-treated patients (median OS: 8.5 months). Baseline characteristics were generally similar between clinical trial arms and RW-matched cohorts. Conclusions We successfully developed RW cohorts for comparison with data from clinical trials, with comparable baseline characteristics. Survival in US patients receiving RW care was similar to that seen in Asian patients receiving placebo in ATTRACTION-2; survival with nivolumab in CheckMate 032 appeared favorable compared with US RW clinical practice.

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC): Results of nivolumab plus chemotherapy (NIVO+chemo) versus chemo from CheckMate 649.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 167-167
Author(s):  
Elena Elimova ◽  
Lucjan Wyrwicz ◽  
Steven I. Blum ◽  
Hong Xiao ◽  
Mingshun Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Mean Differences

167 Background: CheckMate 649 (NCT02872116) is a randomized, open label phase 3 study in first line (1L) treatment of pts with advanced GC/GEJC/EAC. Primary analysis results showed statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS) for NIVO+chemo vs. chemo in all randomized pts. We present HRQOL results for these pts, included as an exploratory study objective. Methods: HRQOL was assessed using EQ-5D-3L (EQ-5D) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Gastric Cancer (FACT-Ga). Assessments were performed at baseline (BL), every 6 weeks during treatment and during follow-up. Change from BL EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Utility Index (UI) and FACT-Ga scores were analyzed using mixed models. Time to first symptom deterioration (TTSD), time until definitive deterioration (TuDD), and time to improvement (TTI) were estimated with Kaplan-Meier estimators and stratified Cox models; deterioration/improvement was based on prespecified meaningful change thresholds. Results: 1581 pts were randomized to NIVO+chemo (n = 789) or chemo (n = 792). Among 1359 pts with BL and post-BL patient-reported outcomes (NIVO+chemo, n = 693; chemo, n = 666), BL scores for FACT-Ga total were similar between treatment groups. Least squares mean differences from BL favored NIVO+chemo at most visits for EQ-5D, FACT-Ga total, and Gastric Cancer Subscale (GaCS), and were comparable for other subscales (not shown). TTI generally favored NIVO+chemo (most HR > 1) but was not significantly different between arms. TTSD was longer in NIVO+chemo arm compared with chemo alone (all HRs < 1), except for Emotional Well-Being (WB); only GaCS and FACT-Ga total were significantly different between arms. TuDD showed statistically significant delays in deterioration (HR with CI < 1) for all scores expect Social WB. Conclusions: Compared with chemo alone, the addition of NIVO to chemo maintained HRQoL with a decreased risk of symptom deterioration in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC/EAC. Together with improved OS, these data support NIVO+chemo as a new 1L standard treatment for GC/GEJC/EAC. Clinical trial information: NCT02872116. [Table: see text]

A multicountry chart review of treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 184-184
Author(s):  
Prianka Singh ◽  
Joseph Gricar ◽  
deMauri S Mackie ◽  
Hong Xiao ◽  
Marc DeCongelio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Real World ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Pathological Response ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer

184 Background: Global neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment patterns among patients with resected Esophageal Cancer (EC) and Gastroesophageal Junction cancer (GEJC) remain unclear. This study describes real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for patients receiving surgery for Stage II or III EC or GEJC. Methods: Physicians in North America (US, Canada), Asia (China, Japan, Taiwan), and Europe (UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain) provided clinical and treatment data in this retrospective, non-interventional chart review conducted from April-June 2020. Included patients were adults (Japan ≥20 years; elsewhere, ≥18 years), who underwent resection of Stage II or III EC or GEJC between October 2017 and October 2018 and were followed until death, loss to follow up, or end of data collection. Results: Physicians (N = 609) provided data on 1693 patients of mean age of 62.4 years, who received surgery for Stage II or III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) (33.3%), esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) (31.5%), or GEJC (35.2%) and were followed a mean (median) of 17.7 (17) months (to death or end of study period). At diagnosis, 85.6% of patients had performance status of 0/1. The majority of patients received an R0 resection (overall, 70.6%; ESCC, 76.6%, EAC, 67.4%, GEJC, 68.0%; p < 0.05); of these, 32.0% had a complete pathological response and 64.1% had a partial pathological response. Neoadjuvant therapy use differed among the treatment groups (ESCC 56.5%; EAC, 65.9%; GEJC, 62.6%, p < 0.05), as did adjuvant therapy (ESCC: 39.8%; EAC, 40.3%; GEJC, 44.5%; p = 0.023). Recurrence rate following surgery did not differ between groups for any recurrence (overall, 21.0%; ESCC 18.5%, EAC 23.6%, GEJC 21.1%); for local or regional recurrence (overall, 11.6%; ESCC, 10.3%; EAC, 12.7%; GEJC, 11.7%); or for metastatic recurrence (overall, 9.5%; ESCC, 8.2%; EAC, 10.9%; GEJC, 9.4%). The median time to local or regional recurrence (for those who progressed during the reporting period) was 8 months from date of initial surgery (overall, 8 mo; ESCC, 8 mo; EAC, 7 mo; GEJC, 8.5 mo; p > 0.05). The frequency of 1L systemic therapy for advanced disease at the time of survey completion was 16.1% overall and differed among patients with ESCC (14.6%); EAC (17.8%); and GEJC (15.9%); p > 0.05. Conclusions: This large multi-country real world data study shows that over half of all patients received neoadjuvant therapy, and over a third received adjuvant treatment. The high unmet need in this population is evident from the post-resection recurrence rate of 21.1% at median 8 months and the high proportion of patients who went on to require advanced disease treatment.

Significance of accurate HER2 testing as a new biomarker in advanced gastric cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 106-106
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Kusumoto ◽  
Hajime Ohtsu ◽  
Hiroyuki Kawano ◽  
Koji Ando ◽  
Satoshi Ida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Tumor Biology ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Her2 Expression ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Her2 Testing ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Her2 Heterogeneity

106 Background: The Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer (ToGA) study is the first international trial to include Japanese patients with human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced or recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer, which demonstrated that trastuzumab plus chemotherapy improved overall survival in the overall population (hazard ratio 0.74). HER2 testing in gastric cancer differs from testing in breast cancer due to inherent differences in tumor biology; gastric cancer more frequently shows HER2 heterogeneity and incomplete membrane staining. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the frequency of HER2-positive cases by application of the standard criteria in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and to investigate the relationships between HER2 expression and therapeutic responses. Methods: A total of 199 tumor samples were assessed for HER2 expression both by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HER2 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). HER2-positive status was defined as IHC2+ and FISH-positive or IHC3+. Objective responses were evaluated in the patients with AGC who were treated with chemotherapy plus trastuzumab or chemotherapy alone based on the HER2 expression status. Results: HER2-positive tumors were identified in 12 patients (5.5%), less than 28.1% in the Japanese subgroup analyses of ToGA study. The positive rates varied with histological type; 14%, 5.3% and 0.95% in the well, moderately and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, respectively. Although high concordance between the results of IHC and FISH in all samples was found, IHC2+ samples retested here showed FISH-negative. Of all 10 patients with AGC, 3 patients with HER2-positive tumor were treated with capecitabine/cisplatin plus trastuzumab, and partial response was found in 2 cases; response rates were 67%. Conclusions: Specific consideration and scoring modification are required before embarking on HER2 testing in gastric cancer. Accurate and reliable HER2 testing and scoring will allow appropriate selection of patients eligible for treatment with trastuzumab.

Preclinical activity of MM-111, a bispecific ErbB2/ErbB3 antibody in previously treated ErbB2-positive gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 48-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Lahdenranta ◽  
Violette Paragas ◽  
Arthur J. Kudla ◽  
Ryan Overland ◽  
Victor M. Moyo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Resistance Mechanism ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Her2 Overexpression ◽  
Multiple Time ◽  
Gastric Cancers ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Erbb3 Signaling

48 Background: ErbB2 (HER2) overexpression has been reported in 7-34% of gastric cancers. ErbB3 (HER3) is the preferred dimerization partner of ErbB2, and ErbB2/ErbB3 heterodimer activation is implicated in the progression and metastasis of ErbB2+ tumors. Activation of ErbB3 signaling is a postulated resistance mechanism to current ErbB2-directed therapies and select chemotherapies. In line with this research, ErbB3 levels are associated with poor prognosis in gastric cancers. MM-111 is a bi-specific antibody that docks to ErbB2 and inhibits ErbB3 signaling in cells that overexpress ErbB2. In this study, MM-111 was evaluated in ErbB2+ gastric cancer by testing the activity of MM-111 in ErbB2+ pre-clinical models of gastric cancer, and by assessing the prevalence of potentially predictive biomarkers in a panel of archived gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tumors. Methods: MM-111 was tested in ErbB2+ gastric cancer xenografts that were either untreated or after tumors ceased to respond to trastuzumab/5-FU. Xenografts were analyzed at multiple time points for the expression of ErbB-receptor family members and their downstream signaling by Luminex -assays. Preclinical data indicate that ErbB2, ErbB3, and heregulin are predictive biomarkers for MM-111. In order to determine the prevalence of our potentially predictive biomarkers in gastric and GEJ cancers, we obtained commercially archived tumor tissue and assayed the tissue for ErbB2 and ErbB3 expression levels using quantitative IHC, and measured heregulin transcript levels by RT-PCR. Results: MM-111 synergizes with various treatment regimens in the 2nd line treatment setting in ErbB2+ gastric cancer xenografts. In our models, the combination of MM-111, trastuzumab, and paclitaxel is particularly effective after tumors progressed on trastuzumab/5-FU. MM-111 inhibits the activity of the ErbB –signaling axis in these models. In addition, 23% of GEJ tumor samples and 20% of gastric samples were positive for potentially predictive biomarkers. Conclusions: ErbB2+xenograft tumors that stop responding to trastuzumab-based therapies benefit from MM-111–based regimens.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document