Significance of accurate HER2 testing as a new biomarker in advanced gastric cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 106-106
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Kusumoto ◽  
Hajime Ohtsu ◽  
Hiroyuki Kawano ◽  
Koji Ando ◽  
Satoshi Ida ◽  
...  

106 Background: The Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer (ToGA) study is the first international trial to include Japanese patients with human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced or recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer, which demonstrated that trastuzumab plus chemotherapy improved overall survival in the overall population (hazard ratio 0.74). HER2 testing in gastric cancer differs from testing in breast cancer due to inherent differences in tumor biology; gastric cancer more frequently shows HER2 heterogeneity and incomplete membrane staining. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the frequency of HER2-positive cases by application of the standard criteria in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and to investigate the relationships between HER2 expression and therapeutic responses. Methods: A total of 199 tumor samples were assessed for HER2 expression both by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HER2 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). HER2-positive status was defined as IHC2+ and FISH-positive or IHC3+. Objective responses were evaluated in the patients with AGC who were treated with chemotherapy plus trastuzumab or chemotherapy alone based on the HER2 expression status. Results: HER2-positive tumors were identified in 12 patients (5.5%), less than 28.1% in the Japanese subgroup analyses of ToGA study. The positive rates varied with histological type; 14%, 5.3% and 0.95% in the well, moderately and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, respectively. Although high concordance between the results of IHC and FISH in all samples was found, IHC2+ samples retested here showed FISH-negative. Of all 10 patients with AGC, 3 patients with HER2-positive tumor were treated with capecitabine/cisplatin plus trastuzumab, and partial response was found in 2 cases; response rates were 67%. Conclusions: Specific consideration and scoring modification are required before embarking on HER2 testing in gastric cancer. Accurate and reliable HER2 testing and scoring will allow appropriate selection of patients eligible for treatment with trastuzumab.

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-82
Author(s):  
Md Azizur Rahman ◽  
Abdullah Md Abu Ayub Ansari ◽  
Kazi Mazharul Islam ◽  
Md Aminur Rahman ◽  
ABM Abdul Matin ◽  
...  

Background: Carcinoma of the stomach is a major cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Due to social impact of gastric carcinoma (GC), there is a need to stratify patients into appropriate screening, surveillance and treatment programs. Although histopathology remains the most reliable and less expensive method, numerous efforts have been made to identify and validate novel biomarkers to accomplish the goals. In recent years, several molecules have been identified and tested for their clinical relevace in GC management. Among the biomarkers with the exception of HER2, none of the biomarkers is currently used in clinical practice, and some of them were described in single studies. Materials and Methods: This prospective type of observational study was performed in the Department of Surgery, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, 6 months from approval of protocol. Total 45 consecutive patients aged 18 years and above without consideration of gender were selected purposefully. Every patient was evaluated by clinical examination, appropriate investigations and after a confirm diagnosis of the tissue from the cancer. All patients have undergone operative intervention and Gastrectomy specimens were subtotal (including cardiac and pylorus), subtotal (including the pylorus), total radical gastrectomy and oesophago-gastrectomy sample. All specimens obtained were immersed in 10% formalin. Samples of whom were sent to the department of pathology, DMCH for histopathology examination. Portion of representative tissue/block was sent to AFIP (Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Dhaka) for immunohistochemistry to find out the HER2 expression in gastric cancer and gastro-oesophageal cancer. Data was collected in a pre-designed questionnaire by face to face interview. Result and observation: In this study when 45 cases were categorized according to WHO grading system it was observed that majority (30) patients were found in grade II, among them 3(10%) were HER2 positive. But with grade III tumour the HER2 positivity were found more i,e; 37.5% (3/8). Grade- I tumor show HER2 neu expression 28.57% (2/7) and according to location most of the cases with HER2 positive expression was located in the gastro-esophageal junction which is 27.27% (3/11) than gastric carcinoma which is 14.70% (5/34). Conclusion: Most of the patients of gastric and gastrooesophageal junction adenocarcinoma are diagnosed at a very late stage, so they require special attention in treatment protocol, including chemotherapy and immunotherapy for increasing their survivability. The study showed with poorly differentiated (high grade) tumour, the HER2 positivity were found more. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2018) Vol. 22 (2) : 79-82


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 142-142
Author(s):  
Montserrat Mangas ◽  
Alberto Carmona Bayonas ◽  
Maria Luisa Sanchez Lorenzo ◽  
Avinash Ramchandani ◽  
Teresa Garcia ◽  
...  

142 Background: A prognostic model in advanced gastric cancer that integrates the Her2 status,histopathological classifications and other patient’s or treatment-dependent parameters is lacking. The aim is to identify clinicopathological factors for overall survival in a cohort of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods: 526 consecutive patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus, gastroesophageal junction or stomach were analyzed. All patients were treated with poly-chemotherapy ( ≥ 2 drugs) at 19 Spanish and one Chilean centers between 2012 and 2015. Characteristics of patients, tumors, therapies and pathological factors, were analyzed by a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: The median overall survival was 10.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.5-11.1], and the time to progression was 6.7 months (95% CI, 6.1-7.2). Independent prognostic factors associated with overall survival were: distal non-diffuse histopathological subtype (hazard ratio, (HR) 0.73), Her2 positive 3+ (HR 0.54), Her2 positive 2+ with FISH + (HR 0.68), surgery of metastases (HR 0.34), Eastern Cooperative Group performance status (ECOG PS) 2 (HR 2.5), ECOG PS 3 (HR 7.37), and only distant lymph node metastases (HR 0.63) (Table 1). Conclusions: We have identified clinicopathological prognostic factors that could be important to stratify advanced gastric cancer, with potential implications in research and treatment. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e003580
Author(s):  
Manish A Shah ◽  
David Cunningham ◽  
Jean-Philippe Metges ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Zev Wainberg ◽  
...  

BackgroundMatrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9) selectively cleaves extracellular matrix proteins contributing to tumor growth and an immunosuppressive microenvironment. This study evaluated andecaliximab (ADX), an inhibitor of MMP9, in combination with nivolumab (NIVO), for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.MethodsPhase 2, open-label, randomized multicenter study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and pharmacodynamics of ADX+NIVO versus NIVO in patients with pretreated metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). We explored the correlation of efficacy outcomes with biomarkers.Results144 patients were randomized; 141 were treated: 81% white, 69% male, median age was 61 years in the ADX+NIVO group and 62 years in the NIVO-alone group. The ORR was 10% (95% CI 4 to 19) in the ADX+NIVO group and 7% (95% CI 2 to 16) in the NIVO-alone group (OR: 1.5 (95% CI 0.4 to 6.1; p=0.8)). There was no response or survival benefit associated with adding ADX. AE rates were comparable in both treatment groups; the most common AEs were fatigue, decreased appetite, nausea, and vomiting. Programmed cell death ligand 1, interferon-γ (IFN), and intratumoral CD8+ cell density were not associated with treatment response or survival. The gene signature most correlated with shorter survival was the epithelial-to-mesenchymal gene signature; high transforming growth factor (TGF)-β fibrosis score was negatively associated with OS (p=0.036). Gene expression analysis of baseline tumors comparing long-(1+ years) and short-term (<1 year) survivors showed that GRB7 was associated with survival beyond 1 year. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive disease was associated with significantly longer survival (p=0.0077). Median tumor mutation burden (TMB) was 2.01; patients with TMB ≥median had longer survival (p=0.0025) and improved PFS (p=0.016). Based on a model accounting for TMB, TGF-β fibrosis, and HER2, TMB was the main driver of survival in this patient population.ConclusionCombination of ADX+NIVO had a favorable safety profile but did not improve efficacy compared with NIVO alone in patients with pretreated metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma. HER2 positivity, higher TMB or GRB7, and lower TGF-β were associated with improved outcomes.Trial registration numberNCT02864381 or GS-US-296–-2013.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Cheol Chung ◽  
Yung-Jue Bang ◽  
Charles S Fuchs ◽  
Shu-Kui Qin ◽  
Taroh Satoh ◽  
...  

Treatment options for patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer are limited, and the prognosis for these patients is poor. Pembrolizumab has demonstrated promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma as monotherapy, in combination with chemotherapy and in combination with trastuzumab. Combining pembrolizumab with trastuzumab and chemotherapy may therefore provide a benefit for patients with advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer. Here we aimed to describe the design of and rationale for the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III KEYNOTE-811 study, which will evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab or placebo in combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Clinical trial registration: NCT03615326 ( ClinicalTrials.gov )


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-311
Author(s):  
Kohei Shitara ◽  
Hiroki Hara ◽  
Takaki Yoshikawa ◽  
Kazumasa Fujitani ◽  
Tomohiro Nishina ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The phase III JACOB trial (NCT01774786) compared the efficacy and safety of pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus chemotherapy with placebo and trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. We conducted a subgroup analysis in Japanese patients. Methods Patients were randomized 1:1 to pertuzumab 840 mg or placebo, plus trastuzumab (loading dose, 8 mg/kg; maintenance dose, 6 mg/kg) and chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m2, and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 28 doses or 5-fluorouracil 800 mg/m2 every 24 h for 120 h), every 3 weeks. Continuation of chemotherapy after 6 cycles was at the discretion of the patient and the treating physician. Results A total of 40 Japanese patients were included in each arm. Median overall survival was 22.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.8–not evaluable) and 15.6 months (95% CI 9.7–19.2) in the pertuzumab and placebo arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64 [95% CI 0.37–1.10]). Median progression-free survival was 12.4 months (95% CI 6.1–14.1) in the pertuzumab arm and 6.3 months (95% CI 4.3–8.1) in the placebo arm (HR 0.50 [95% CI 0.30–0.82]). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events and serious adverse events were more frequent in the pertuzumab arm than the placebo arm. Conclusions Results from this subgroup analysis of the JACOB trial suggest similar efficacy of pertuzumab in Japanese patients and patients in the overall population, encouraging continued investigation of new agents for gastric cancer in Japanese patients.


Author(s):  
Kensei Yamaguchi ◽  
Nozomu Fuse ◽  
Yoshito Komatsu ◽  
Hirofumi Fujii ◽  
Shuichi Hironaka ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective We evaluated the efficacy and safety of first-line S-1 plus cisplatin in combination with cetuximab for Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer, including gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Methods This open-label, single arm, multicenter, phase 2 trial was conducted to assess first-line cetuximab plus S-1 plus cisplatin for advanced gastric cancer. A total of 40 patients from 10 centers were enrolled. Cetuximab was administered weekly, with the initial infusion at 400 mg/m2 and then 250 mg/m2 each subsequent week. S-1 plus cisplatin chemotherapy was concomitantly conducted in a 5-week cycle: S-1 (40–60 mg, adjusted for body surface area) was given twice daily for 3 consecutive weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period, and cisplatin (60 mg/m2) was given on day 8 of each cycle for a maximum of 8 cycles. Treatment continued until the occurrence of radiographically confirmed progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was the best overall response. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and safety. Results A total of 40 patients were evaluable. One patient (2.5%) had a complete response; 15 patients (37.5%) had a partial response. The observed overall response rate according to the independent review committee was 40.0% (95% confidence interval, 24.9–56.7; P = 0.7043 [one-sided null hypothesis: overall response rate ≤ 43%]); median PFS was 5.6 months (95% confidence intervals, 4.2–8.3). No adverse events leading to death were reported during the study, and no specific safety concerns were observed. Conclusions Overall, the addition of cetuximab to S-1 plus cisplatin was well tolerated in patients with advanced gastric cancer but provided no additional clinical benefit in this study. ClinicalTrials.gov  identifier: NCT01388790.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document