scholarly journals The clinical value and usage of inflammatory and nutritional markers in survival prediction for gastric cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and D2 lymphadenectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 540-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziyu Li ◽  
Shuangxi Li ◽  
Xiangji Ying ◽  
Lianhai Zhang ◽  
Fei Shan ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 90-90
Author(s):  
Tao Li ◽  
Lin Chen

90 Background: RESONANCE trial aims to improve 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and D2 surgery with chemotherapy postoperatively. We also evaluated the postoperative complications with and without preoperative chemotherapy to reveal the safety of SOX regimen. Methods: In this phase III multicenter study, patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC,7thed)stage II-IIII advanced gastric cancer are treated with two to four cycles of preoperative SOX chemotherapy, followed by gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy, and then another four to six postoperative cycles of SOX chemotherapy. Surgical and pathological quality control is performed. The primary endpoint is 3-year DFS, secondary endpoints are 3-year OS, D2/R0 rate, and toxicity and recurrence risk. The RESONANCE trial has been registered internationally, and twenty hospitals have participated in this trial. Results: Between February 2012 and to August 2013, 128 patients were enrolled in the neoadjuvant group , 103 patients were enrolled in the adjuvant group. Seventy-four of 128 patients underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy after preoperative chemotherapy. In these 74 patients, 52 (70%) patients had clinical tumor response and 10 (14%) patients achieved histological response. Operative mortality was never encountered. R0 resection rate was 90.5% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with 94.2% in adjuvant group (p=0.23). Postoperative complication rates in neoadjuvant and adjuvant groups were 33.8% and 37.9% respectively (p=0.58). Conclusions: Results of this study will demonstrate whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategy will be superior to adjuvant chemotherapy when combined with D2 surgery for AJCC stage II-III gastric cancer patients. Furthermore, it might be an important clinical evidence to verify benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01583361.


2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. S157
Author(s):  
I. Shchepotin ◽  
O. Kolesnik ◽  
A. Lukashenko ◽  
A. Burlaka ◽  
Y. Gukov ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 133-133
Author(s):  
Haruhiko Cho ◽  
Takaki Yoshikawa

133 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after D2 gastrectomy has become a standard treatment for stage 2/3 gastric cancer in Japan and Korea; however, the results remain unsatisfactory due to insufficient risk reduction in patients with stage 3 disease and low compliance. Although the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a promising approach associated with a high rate of compliance and a downstage effect, the long-term survival benefits of this modality are unclear. Moreover, the impact of the pathological response on survival has not been evaluated. Based on the hypothesis that the pathological response grade is associated with survival, we conducted a search for reports of a pathological complete response (pCR) obtained with NAC. Methods: A total of 27 gastric cancer patients who achieved a pCR following NAC therapy were identified using PubMed and the Japanese medical search engine “Ichu-shi,” with the search words “gastric cancer,” “NAC,” and “pCR.” A questionnaire regarding the patients’ prognoses was posted in 23 institutions in Japan in July 2013. Results: Answers regarding 22 patients were obtained from 20 institutions. The subjects included 13 males and nine females. The mean age was 67.5 years. Tumors with stage 3/4 (95.4%: 21/22) and a diffuse-type histology (61.9%: 13/21) were dominant. S1/CDDP was the most frequently selected NAC regimen. A total of 77.2% (17/22) of the patients required combined resection of adjacent organs, and all patients underwent R0 resection and D2 lymphadenectomy. At present, 86.3% (19/22) of the patients are alive without recurrence; none of the ten patients who received postoperative AC demonstrated any recurrence, while three of twelve patients who did not receive postoperative AC developed recurrence, and two patients died of the disease after surgery (at 71 months and nine months, respectively). The overall and recurrence-free survival rates at three/five years were 95.5%/85.1% and 90.9%/75.1%, respectively. Conclusions: Patients with gastric cancer who achieve a pCR with NAC are rare; however, their prognoses are excellent. It is therefore important to develop a NAC regimen focusing on a high pCR rate.


2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-255
Author(s):  
Tomaz Jagric ◽  
Bojan Ilijevec ◽  
Vaneja Velenik ◽  
Janja Ocvirk ◽  
Stojan Potrc

Abstract Background To determine the effects of perioperative treatment of gastric cancer patients, we conducted an analysis with propensity score matched patient groups to determine the role of perioperative chemotherapy in patients after D2 lymphadenectomy. Patients and methods From our database of 1563 patients, 482 patients were selected with propensity score matching and divided into two balanced groups: 241 patients in the surgery only group and 241 patients in the perioperative group. The long-term results of treatment were compared between the two groups. Results Most of the included patients received radio-chemotherapy with capecitabine (n = 111; 46%) and perioperative chemotherapy with epirubicin, oxalliplatin and capecitabine (n = 91; 37.7%). 92.9% of the patients received a D2 lymph node dissection. Perioperative morbidity was similar between surgery only (18.3%) and perioperative treatment groups (20.7%) (p = 0.537). The perioperative mortality was not influenced by perioperative treatment. A pathological response was observed in 12.5% of patients. The overall 5-year and median survivals were significantly higher in the perioperative treatment group (50.5%; 51.7 moths) compared to surgery only group (41.8%; 34.9 months; p = 0.038). The subgroup analysis revealed that only patients with the TNM stages T3 (p = 0.028), N2 (p = 0.009), N3b (p = 0.043), and UICC stages IIIb (p = 0.003) and IIIc (p = 0.03) significantly benefit from perioperative treatment. Conclusions Perioperative treatment in radically resected gastric cancer patients after D2 lymphadenectomy was beneficial in stages IIIb and IIIc. The effects of perioperative treatment in lower stages could be negated by the effects of the radical surgery in lower stages and in higher stages by the biology of the disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document