Laser ablation of fistula tract (LAFT) and complex fistula-in-ano: “the ideal indication” is becoming clearer…

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 695-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. de Bonnechose ◽  
J. H. Lefevre ◽  
M. Aubert ◽  
N. Lemarchand ◽  
N. Fathallah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Fistula Tract ◽  
Fistula In Ano ◽  
Complex Fistula ◽  
The Ideal

scholarly journals LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF LIGATION OF INTERSPHINCTERIC FISTULA TRACT FOR COMPLEX FISTULA-IN-ANO: MODIFIED OPERATIVE PROCEDURE EXPERIENCE

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ke WEN ◽  
Yun-Fei GU ◽  
Xue-Liang SUN ◽  
Xiao-Peng WANG ◽  
Shuai YAN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Cleveland Clinic ◽  
Fistula Tract ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Fistula In Ano ◽  
Complex Fistula ◽  
Intersphincteric Fistula

ABSTRACT Background: It is important but difficult to treat complex fistula-in-ano due to the high recurrent rate and following incontinence. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT), a novel surgical procedure with the advantage of avoiding anal incontinence, has a variable success rate of 57-94.4 %. Aim: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of modified LIFT operative procedure - ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract - to treat complex fistula-in-ano. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 62 cases of complex fistula-in-ano. The group was treated with the modified approach of LIFT (curved incision was made in the anal canal skin; purse-string suture was performed around the fistula; the residual fistulas were removed in a tunnel-based way) and had a follow-up time of more than one year. Patient´s preoperative general condition, postoperative efficacy and their anal function were compared. Results: The median age of the participants was 34, and 43 (69.4%) cases were male. Forty-one (66.1%) cases were of high transsphincteric fistula, four (6.5%) cases of high intrasphincter fistula, and 17 (27.4%) cases of anterior anal fistula in female. The median follow-up duration was 24.5 (range, 12-51) months. The success rate in the end of follow-up was 83.9% (52/62). The anorectal pressure and Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence (CCF-FI) evaluated three months before and after the operation did not find apparent changes. Conclusions: Compared with LIFT, the modified LIFT remarkably reduces postoperative failure and the recurrence rate of complex fistula with acceptable long-term outcomes.

Long-term Outcomes of Laser Ablation of Fistula Tract for Fistula-in-Ano

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 831-836
Author(s):  
Ozgen Isik ◽  
Baris Gulcu ◽  
Ersin Ozturk
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Fistula Tract ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Fistula In Ano

scholarly journals Management of Complex Fistula in Ana with Fistulotomy and Stage Procedure

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-87
Author(s):  
MNH Masum ◽  
A Yazdani ◽  
M Masum ◽  
MS Biswas ◽  
MA Bhuiyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anal Verge ◽  
Advancement Flap ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Fistula Tract ◽  
Internal Opening ◽  
Fistula In Ano ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Stool Incontinence ◽  
Complex Fistula

Background: Complex fistula in ano is a troublesome disease and is difficult to treat. Complex fistula in ano occurs in various forms like multiple external and/or internal openings, internal opening above the dentate line, external opening far away from anal verge, anterior tract etc. They are almost invariably recurrent and frequently associated with other systemic diseases like tuberculosis, inflammatory bowel disease, malignancy etc.A complex fistula in ano has various modalities of treatments like application of setons, fistulotomy or fistulectomy, endorectal advancement flap, anocutaneous advancement flap, fistula plug, fibrin glue, electrocauterization of tract/laser and ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT). Objective: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the outcome of complex fistula in ano by fistulotomy and staged procedure. Methods: The study was held in Dhaka medical college Hospital and various private hospitals located in Dhaka and Brahmonbaria within duration of 8 years (from January, 2011 to January, 2018). Among 256 patients (221 male, 35 female) with median age 48 years (30 to 72 years) with the diagnosis of complex fistula in ano, 135 underwent fistulotomy with application of Seton with stage procedure. 121 patients underwent single stage fistulotomy. 158 patients had history of previous operations. After stage procedure, regular follow up was done every week until wound healing occurred. Result: Among 256 patients 121 patients (47%) underwent single stage, 133 (52%) patients underwent two stage and 2 patients underwent three stage procedure during the trial period. Majority of the patients had minor incontinence; that is flatus and/or loose stool incontinence. But they only persisted for an average of 10 to 16 days and subsided spontaneously. None of the patient had any major (solid stool) incontinence. 4 patients (2%) had recurrence of fistula on an average of 3-6 months after complete healing. Recurrence occurred in the form of abscess, automatically burst internally, recurrent fistula.2 patients developed bleeding after single stage procedure and was managed by cauterization. Conclusion: With adequate postoperative care and regular follow up, application of Seton with ‘staged procedure’ in cases of complex fistula in ano is very effective and has very minimal complications. Chance of major incontinence and recurrence is also less. J Dhaka Medical College, Vol. 27, No.1, April, 2018, Page 83-87

Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract: a Sphincter-Sparing Option for Complex Fistula-in-Ano

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 439-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin O. Lange ◽  
Linda Ferrari ◽  
Mukta Krane ◽  
Alessandro Fichera
Keyword(s):  
Fistula Tract ◽  
Fistula In Ano ◽  
Complex Fistula ◽  
Intersphincteric Fistula

scholarly journals Outcome of Seton in the Management of Complex Fistula in Ano in a Tertiary Care Center in Bangladesh

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-19
Author(s):  
Md Armanul Islam ◽  
Md Mahfuzur Rahman Khan ◽  
Md Mustafizur Rahman ◽  
SM Quamrul Akther ◽  
Md Mozammel Hoque ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anal Fistula ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Fistulous Tract ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Fistula Tract ◽  
Internal Opening ◽  
Narcotic Analgesics ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Fistula In Ano ◽  
Complex Fistula

Background: The management of high and complex anal fistulas remain a therapeutic challenge as it is often associated with recurrence and anal incontinence. The oldest and theoretically the simplest technique is to use a seton. The aim of this study is to find out the outcome of seton in the treatment of complex fistula in ano. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was done in surgical units of ShSMCH and colorectal surgery units of BSMMU from September 2014 to August 2015. Fifty patients with high anal fistula having internal opening above dentate line and with multiple fistulas tract were included by purposive sampling. Patients with low anal fistula, fistula in ano associated with Crohn’s disease, active abdominal tuberculosis, carcinoma of rectum, previous radiation therapy, with recurrent fistula in ano and in whom the internal opening could not be located were excluded. After initial evaluation, the fistula tract and opening were located. The skin and anoderm overlying the fistulous tract were incised. This double-strand seton was then tied over itself on the sphincter without excessive tension. The long end of each suture was tapped to the patient’s medial thigh. Postoperatively warm sitz bath after each bowel movement was advised. The patients were informed in detail about the presence of seton prosthesis and they were warned about the possible serous discharge that would continue until the seton dropped, and the wound healed. Data were recorded on the predesigned questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS version 16. Results: Among 50 cases mean age was 41 years, M: F was 4.5:1. Discharge from perianal sinus, pain, swelling and itching were common clinical presentation. All of the patients were discharged on the third postoperative day. None required readmission or needed narcotic analgesics after discharge. The average time for the seton to cut through the sphincter was 1 to 3 months. 28% had complete healing at 1 month and 66% at 3 months postoperatively. Flatus Incontinence was noted 16% cases followed by recurrence (6%), liquid stool incontinence (4%) and postoperative anal stricture was (2%) of cases. Conclusion: This study found that the seton is a safe and low morbidity option for the treatment of high and complex fistula-in-ano, having higher healing rates, with good quality of life. It can therefore be recommended as the standard treatment for complex fistula-in-ano. J Shaheed Suhrawardy Med Coll, December 2020, Vol.12(1); 15-19

scholarly journals Outcome of fecal incontinence in the two-staged seton fistulotomy for complex fistula in ANO.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (08) ◽  
pp. 1061-1066
Author(s):  
Rabia Ikram ◽  
◽  
Shafique ur Rehman ◽  
Haroon Javaid Majid ◽  
Arif Javed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fecal Incontinence ◽  
Feeding Tube ◽  
Fistula Tract ◽  
Ethical Review ◽  
Lithotomy Position ◽  
Internal Opening ◽  
Suitable Alternative ◽  
Fistula In Ano ◽  
Complex Fistula ◽  
Second Procedure

Objective: To determine the frequency of fecal incontinence in the two-staged Seton fistulotomy in complex fistula in ano. Study Design: Prospective Cohort study. Setting: Surgical Out-patient Department at Shaikh Zayed Hospital Lahore. Period: September 2015 till March 2016. Material & Methods: After ethical review board approval, data was collected from 100 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All the procedures were conducted in the lithotomy position, under spinal or general anesthesia. A rigid sigmoidoscopy and proctoscopy was done prior to intervention. Fistula tract was marked using hydrogen peroxide (H202) for the identification of the internal opening. The external opening was gently probed using a standard 3 mm blunt-tipped probe till the internal opening was reached. The portion of the track outside the sphincter mechanism and any lateral tracts were laid open. A feeding tube of size 5 French was loosely tied around the remaining muscular portion of the sphincter complex. The seton was left in place for six weeks followed by secondary fistulotomy. Patients were evaluated for incontinence one month after the second procedure. Results: In our study, mean age was calculated as 47.38+10.96 years, 73%(n=73) were male and 27%(n=27) were females, frequency of fecal incontinence in the two-staged Seton fistulotomy in complex fistula in ano was recorded in 17%(n=17). Conclusion: The frequency of fecal incontinence in the two-staged seton fistulotomy for complex fistula in ano was acceptable in our study population and in tandem with literature. The procedure may be a suitable alternative to loose-seton placement alone.

scholarly journals The Use of Seton as a Bridge to Definitive Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract Procedure for Fistula-in-ano: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Placer-Galán ◽  
Jose Mª Enriquez-Navascués ◽  
Tania Pastor-Bonel ◽  
Ignacio Aguirre-Allende ◽  
Yolanda Saralegui-Ansorena
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anal Fistula ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Fistula Tract ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Fistula In Ano ◽  
Intersphincteric Fistula ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Seton Placement ◽  
Primary Healing

Abstract Background There is still controversy over the usefulness of seton placement prior to the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) surgery in the management of anal fistula. Objective To evaluate the impact of preoperative seton placement on the outcomes of LIFT surgery for the management of fistula-in-ano. Design systematic review and meta-analysis. Data Sources A search was performed on the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar databases. Study Selection Original studies without language restriction reporting the primary healing rates with and without seton placement as a bridge to definitive LIFT surgery were included. Intervention The intervention assessed was the LIFT with and without prior seton placement. Main Outcome Measures The main outcome was defined as the primary healing rate with and without the use of seton as a bridge to definitive LIFT surgery. Results Ten studies met the criteria for systematic review, all retrospective, with a pooled study population of 772 patients. There were no significant differences in the percentages of recurrence between patients with and without seton placement (odds ratio [OR] 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73–1.43: p = 0.35). The I2 value was 9%, which shows the homogeneity of the results among the analyzed studies. The 10 included studies demonstrated a weighted average overall recurrence of 38% (interquartile range [IQR] 27–42.7%), recurrence with the use of seton was 40% (IQR 26.6–51.2%), and without its use, the recurrence rate was 51.3% (IQR 31.3–51.3%) Limitations The levels of evidence found in the available literature were relatively fair, as indicated after qualitative evaluation using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Attitude Heading Reference System (AHRS) evidence levels. Conclusions Our meta-analysis suggests that the placement of seton as a bridge treatment prior to LIFT surgery does not significantly improve long-term anal fistula healing outcomes. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract surgery can be performed safely and effectively with no previous seton placement.International prospective register of systematic reviews—PROSPERO registration number: CDR42020149173.

Modified Lift Versus Cutting Seton for Transphincteric Fistula -Experience at Tertiary Care Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 3257-3260
Author(s):  
Muhammad Najam Iqbal ◽  
Ashfaq Nasir
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Anal Incontinence ◽  
Complete Healing ◽  
Fistula Tract ◽  
Fistula Closure ◽  
Fistula In Ano ◽  
Group A ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Cutting Seton ◽  
Group B

Background: Fistula in ano is a common disease which has high recurrence rate and high fecal incontinence rate after surgery. We compared modified LIFT (Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) through lateral approach ) with cutting seton for transphincteric fistula. Aim: This study is aimed at which procedure is better with respect to postoperative complications Study design: It was a prospective comparative study. Methods: This was a prospective comparative study from 01-01-2019 to 30-06-2021 which was conducted on 50 patients who presented with transsphincteric fistula in ano (FIA) in surgical ward of Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur. Patients were divided into two groups .Patients of Group A underwent modified lift procedure and patients of group B underwent cutting seton procedure. Data was collected on a proforma which included patients’ name ,age ,sex, age group, comorbid disease like diabetes mellitus ,chronic liver disease, cardiovascular disease and chronic renal failure, fistula tract involving less than 50% or more than 50% external sphincter ,procedure done, healing time of wound, complications like recurrence and incontinence. Patients were followed for 6 months for healing rate ,recurrence and incontinence. Data was analysed on spss 22 version Results: In Group A, complete healing (fistula closure without recurrence) was achieved in 20 patients (80%) out of 25. There was no case of anal incontinence after the procedure. 5 (20%) patients experienced recurrence in 6 months . In Group B, complete healing (fistula closure without recurrence) was achieved in 21 patients (84%), in 6 months follow up . 4(16%) patients were diagnosed as a case of anal incontinence. There were 4 (16%) patients with recurrence. Conclusion: Modified LIFT is better in terms of incontinence where as cutting seton is better in terms of recurrence.it is suggested that for high lying fistula modified LIFT is better procedure and for low lying fistula involving less than 50% sphincter cutting seton is better procedure.. Keywords: Modified LIFT (ligation of ineter sphincteric fistula tract) ,Cutting seton , transphincteric fistula.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document