scholarly journals Evaluation of a Finite-Element Sea-Ice Ocean Model (FESOM) set-up to study the interannual to decadal variability in the deep-water formation rates

2013 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Scholz ◽  
Gerrit Lohmann ◽  
Qiang Wang ◽  
Sergey Danilov
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Deep Water ◽  
Decadal Variability ◽  
Ocean Model ◽  
Deep Water Formation ◽  
Water Formation ◽  
Set Up

scholarly journals Arctic–North Atlantic Interactions and Multidecadal Variability of the Meridional Overturning Circulation

2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (19) ◽  
pp. 4013-4031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johann H. Jungclaus ◽  
Helmuth Haak ◽  
Mojib Latif ◽  
Uwe Mikolajewicz
Keyword(s):  
North Atlantic ◽  
Deep Water ◽  
Ocean Model ◽  
Meridional Overturning Circulation ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Deep Water Formation ◽  
Overturning Circulation ◽  
Multidecadal Variability ◽  
Water Formation ◽  
Meridional Overturning

Abstract Analyses of a 500-yr control integration with the non-flux-adjusted coupled atmosphere–sea ice–ocean model ECHAM5/Max-Planck-Institute Ocean Model (MPI-OM) show pronounced multidecadal fluctuations of the Atlantic overturning circulation and the associated meridional heat transport. The period of the oscillations is about 70–80 yr. The low-frequency variability of the meridional overturning circulation (MOC) contributes substantially to sea surface temperature and sea ice fluctuations in the North Atlantic. The strength of the overturning circulation is related to the convective activity in the deep-water formation regions, most notably the Labrador Sea, and the time-varying control on the freshwater export from the Arctic to the convection sites modulates the overturning circulation. The variability is sustained by an interplay between the storage and release of freshwater from the central Arctic and circulation changes in the Nordic Seas that are caused by variations in the Atlantic heat and salt transport. The relatively high resolution in the deep-water formation region and the Arctic Ocean suggests that a better representation of convective and frontal processes not only leads to an improvement in the mean state but also introduces new mechanisms determining multidecadal variability in large-scale ocean circulation.

scholarly journals North Atlantic deep water formation and AMOC in CMIP5 models

Ocean Science ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 609-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Céline Heuzé
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Ocean Circulation ◽  
North Atlantic ◽  
Deep Water ◽  
Deep Convection ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Subpolar Gyre ◽  
Deep Water Formation ◽  
Nordic Seas ◽  
Water Formation

Abstract. Deep water formation in climate models is indicative of their ability to simulate future ocean circulation, carbon and heat uptake, and sea level rise. Present-day temperature, salinity, sea ice concentration and ocean transport in the North Atlantic subpolar gyre and Nordic Seas from 23 CMIP5 (Climate Model Intercomparison Project, phase 5) models are compared with observations to assess the biases, causes and consequences of North Atlantic deep convection in models. The majority of models convect too deep, over too large an area, too often and too far south. Deep convection occurs at the sea ice edge and is most realistic in models with accurate sea ice extent, mostly those using the CICE model. Half of the models convect in response to local cooling or salinification of the surface waters; only a third have a dynamic relationship between freshwater coming from the Arctic and deep convection. The models with the most intense deep convection have the warmest deep waters, due to a redistribution of heat through the water column. For the majority of models, the variability of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is explained by the volumes of deep water produced in the subpolar gyre and Nordic Seas up to 2 years before. In turn, models with the strongest AMOC have the largest heat export to the Arctic. Understanding the dynamical drivers of deep convection and AMOC in models is hence key to realistically forecasting Arctic oceanic warming and its consequences for the global ocean circulation, cryosphere and marine life.

Influence of Nordic Seas dynamics on the Atlantic Water propagation and its impacts on sea ice concentration.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sourav Chatterjee ◽  
Roshin P Raj ◽  
Laurent Bertino ◽  
Nuncio Murukesh
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Deep Water ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Deep Water Formation ◽  
Sea Ice Concentration ◽  
Nordic Seas ◽  
Ice Concentration ◽  
Water Formation

<p>Enhanced intrusion of warm and saline Atlantic Water (AW) to the Arctic Ocean (AO) in recent years has drawn wide interest of the scientific community owing to its potential role in ‘Arctic Amplification’. Not only the AW has warmed over the last few decades , but its transfer efficiency have also undergone significant modifications due to changes in atmosphere and ocean dynamics at regional to large scales. The Nordic Seas (NS), in this regard, play a vital role as the major exchange of polar and sub-polar waters takes place in this region. Further, the AW and its significant modification on its way to AO via the Nordic Seas has large scale implications on e.g., deep water formation, air-sea heat fluxes. Previous studies have suggested that a change in the sub-polar gyre dynamics in the North Atlantic controls the AW anomalies that enter the NS and eventually end up in the AO. However, the role of NS dynamics in resulting in the modifications of these AW anomalies are not well studied. Here in this study, we show that the Nordic Seas are not only a passive conduit of AW anomalies but the ocean circulations in the Nordic Seas, particularly the Greenland Sea Gyre (GSG) circulation can significantly change the AW characteristics between the entry and exit point of AW in the NS. Further, it is shown that the change in GSG circulation can modify the AW heat distribution in the Nordic Seas and can potentially influence the sea ice concentration therein. Projected enhanced atmospheric forcing in the NS in a warming Arctic scenario and the warming trend of the AW can amplify the role of NS circulation in AW propagation and its impact on sea ice, freshwater budget and deep water formation.</p>

scholarly journals Changes in Mediterranean circulation and water characteristics due to restriction of the Atlantic connection: a high-resolution ocean model

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. P. M. Topper ◽  
P. Th. Meijer
Keyword(s):  
Deep Water ◽  
Ocean Model ◽  
Messinian Salinity Crisis ◽  
Deep Water Formation ◽  
Western Basin ◽  
Eastern Basin ◽  
Water Characteristics ◽  
Water Formation ◽  
Sill Depth ◽  
The Mediterranean

Abstract. A high-resolution parallel ocean model is set up to examine how the sill depth of the Atlantic connection affects circulation and water characteristics in the Mediterranean Basin. An analysis of the model performance, comparing model results with observations of the present-day Mediterranean, demonstrates its ability to reproduce observed water characteristics and circulation (including deep water formation). A series of experiments with different sill depths in the Atlantic–Mediterranean connection is used to assess the sensitivity of Mediterranean circulation and water characteristics to sill depth. Basin-averaged water salinity and, to a lesser degree, temperature rise when the sill depth is shallower and exchange with the Atlantic is lower. Lateral and interbasinal differences in the Mediterranean are, however, largely unchanged. The strength of the upper overturning cell in the western basin is proportional to the magnitude of the exchange with the Atlantic, and hence to sill depth. Overturning in the eastern basin and deep water formation in both basins, on the contrary, are little affected by the sill depth. The model results are used to interpret the sedimentary record of the Late Miocene preceding and during the Messinian Salinity Crisis. In the western basin, a correlation exists between sill depth and rate of refreshment of deep water. On the other hand, because sill depth has little effect on the overturning and deep water formation in the eastern basin, the model results do not support the notion that restriction of the Atlantic–Mediterranean connection may cause lower oxygenation of deep water in the eastern basin. However, this discrepancy may be due to simplifications in the surface forcing and the use of a bathymetry different from that in the Late Miocene. We also tentatively conclude that blocked outflow, as found in experiments with a sill depth ≤10 m, is a plausible scenario for the second stage of the Messinian Salinity Crisis during which halite was rapidly accumulated in the Mediterranean. With the model setup and experiments, a basis has been established for future work on the sensitivity of Mediterranean circulation to changes in (palaeo-)bathymetry and external forcings.

Southern ocean–sea-ice interaction: implications for climate and modelling

1990 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas G. Martinson
Keyword(s):  
Surface Water ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Water Column ◽  
Deep Water ◽  
Stable Region ◽  
Deep Water Formation ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Water Column Stability ◽  
Water Formation ◽  
Ocean Region

ABSTRACTThe ocean/sea-ice interaction of the Antarctic open ocean region is described through a one-dimensional model. The model includes processes responsible for maintaining stability in this marginally stable region and reveals the importance of the various processes controlling deep water formation/ventilation and sea-ice thickness and their sensitivity to climate change. This information is used to estimate changes, as they impact water column stability, induced by glacial conditions. Increased stability is conducive to greater ice cover and less deep water formation/ventilation; decreased stability conducive to the opposite.Sensitivity studies show that the system is destabilised given: (1) shallowing of the pycnocline (induced by increased gyre vigor); (2) decrease in the ratio of heat to salt through the pycnocline (induced by introducing a colder and/or saltier deep water or by increasing the salinity of the surface water); (3) decreased pycnocline strength (induced by a fresher deep water or saltier surface water) and (4) increased atmospheric heat loss. Most of the assumed glacial conditions drive the system toward destabilisation, but the critical effect of changes in NADW characteristics depends strongly on the temperature and salinity of the replacement water. The importance of this deep water influence is evident today—as little as 3Wm−2 in the upper ocean heat balance or an additional 15 cm of ice growth is sufficient to overturn the water column in some regions.

scholarly journals North Atlantic deep water formation and AMOC in CMIP5 models

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Céline Heuzé
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Ocean Circulation ◽  
North Atlantic ◽  
Deep Water ◽  
Deep Convection ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Subpolar Gyre ◽  
Deep Water Formation ◽  
Nordic Seas ◽  
Water Formation

Abstract. Deep water formation in climate models is indicative of their ability to simulate future ocean circulation, carbon and heat uptake, and sea level rise. Present-day temperature, salinity, sea ice concentration and ocean transport in the North Atlantic subpolar gyre and Nordic Seas from 23 CMIP5 (Climate Model Intercomparison Project, phase 5) models are compared with observations to assess the biases, causes and consequences of North Atlantic deep convection in models. The majority of models convect too deep, over too large an area, too often, and too far south. Deep convection occurs at the sea ice edge and is most realistic in models with accurate sea ice extent, mostly those using the CICE model. Half of the models convect in response to local cooling or salinification of the surface waters; only a third have a dynamic relationship between freshwater coming from the Arctic and deep convection. The models with the most intense deep convection have the warmest deep waters, due to a redistribution of heat through the water column. For the majority of models, the variability of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is explained by the volumes of deep water produced in the subpolar gyre and Nordic Seas up to 2 years before. In turns, models with the strongest AMOC have the largest heat export to the Arctic. Understanding the dynamical drivers of deep convection and AMOC in models is hence key to realistically forecast Arctic oceanic warming and its consequences on the global ocean circulation, cryosphere and marine life.

scholarly journals Multi-model based estimation of sea ice volume variations in the Baffin Bay

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Min ◽  
Qinghua Yang ◽  
Longjiang Mu ◽  
Frank Kauker ◽  
Robert Ricker
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Deep Water ◽  
Meridional Overturning Circulation ◽  
Deep Water Formation ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Baffin Bay ◽  
Ice Volume ◽  
Water Formation ◽  
Ensemble Mean ◽  
Meridional Overturning

Abstract. Sea ice in Baffin Bay plays an important role in the deep water formation in the Labrador Sea and contributes to the variation of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) on larger scales. To quantify the sea ice volume variations in Baffin Bay, a major driver of the deep water formation, three state-of-the-art sea ice models (CMST, NAOSIM, and PIOMAS) are investigated in the melt and freezing season from 2011 to 2016. An ensemble of three estimates of the sea ice volume fluxes in Baffin Bay is generated from the three modeled sea ice thickness and NSIDC satellite derived ice drift data. Results show that the net increase of the ensemble mean sea ice volume (SIV) in Baffin Bay occurs from October to April with the largest SIV increase in December (116 ± 16 km3 month−1) and the reduction occurs from May to September with the largest SIV decline in July (−160 ± 32 km3 month−1). The maximum SIV inflow occurs in winter in all the model data consistently. The ensemble mean SIV inflow (322 ± 4 km3) reaches its maximum in winter 2013 caused by high ice velocities while the largest SIV outflow (244 ± 61 km3) occurs in spring of 2014. The long-term annual mean ice volume inflow and outflow are 437(± 53) km3 and 339(± 68) km3, respectively. Our analysis also reveals that on average, sea ice in Baffin Bay melts from May to October with a net reduction of 335 km3 in volume while it freezes from November to April with a net increase of 251 km3.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document