Impact of race on outcomes in intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia

Author(s):  
Ivy Elizabeth Abraham ◽  
Anand Ashwin Patel ◽  
Heidy Wang ◽  
John Patrick Galvin ◽  
Olga Frankfurt ◽  
...  
Haematologica ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 96 (9) ◽  
pp. 1310-1317 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J. M. de Jonge ◽  
P. J. M. Valk ◽  
E. S. J. M. de Bont ◽  
J. J. Schuringa ◽  
G. Ossenkoppele ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (6) ◽  
pp. 971-978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Röllig ◽  
Christian Thiede ◽  
Martin Gramatzki ◽  
Walter Aulitzky ◽  
Heinrich Bodenstein ◽  
...  

Abstract We present an analysis of prognostic factors derived from a trial in patients with acute myeloid leukemia older than 60 years. The AML96 trial included 909 patients with a median age of 67 years (range, 61-87 years). Treatment included cytarabine-based induction therapy followed by 1 consolidation. The median follow-up time for all patients is 68 months (5.7 years). A total of 454 of all 909 patients reached a complete remission (50%). Five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were 9.7% and 14%, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that karyotype, age, NPM1 mutation status, white blood cell count, lactate dehydrogenase, and CD34 expression were of independent prognostic significance for OS. On the basis of the multivariate Cox model, an additive risk score was developed that allowed the subdivision of the largest group of patients with an intermediate-risk karyotype into 2 groups. We are, therefore, able to distinguish 4 prognostic groups: favorable risk, good intermediate risk, adverse intermediate risk, and high risk. The corresponding 3-year OS rates were 39.5%, 30%, 10.6%, and 3.3%, respectively. The risk model allows further stratification of patients with intermediate-risk karyotype into 2 prognostic groups with implications for the therapeutic strategy. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00180115.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 207-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun Wu ◽  
Yifeng Dai ◽  
Yuan Zhang ◽  
Xiufeng Wang ◽  
Lihua Wang ◽  
...  

Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (44) ◽  
pp. 76003-76014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Pallarès ◽  
Montserrat Hoyos ◽  
M. Carmen Chillón ◽  
Eva Barragán ◽  
M. Isabel Prieto Conde ◽  
...  

Hematology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstanze Döhner ◽  
Peter Paschka

Abstract In recent years, research in molecular genetics has been instrumental in deciphering the molecular heterogeneity of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), in particular the subset of patients with “intermediate-risk” cytogenetics. However, at present, only the markers NPM1, CEBPA, and FLT3 have entered clinical practice. Treatment of intermediate-risk AML patients eligible for intensive therapy has not changed substantially. The “3 + 7” induction therapy still represents the standard of care. The addition of the immunoconjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin to therapy has been shown to improve outcome; however, the drug is not approved for this use. A common standard for postremission therapy is the administration of repeated cycles of intermediate- to high-dose cytarabine. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation may offer a survival benefit for many patients with intermediate-risk AML. Patients are best selected based on the genetic profile of the leukemia cells and the risk associated with the transplantation itself. A myriad of novel agents targeting mutant leukemia drivers or deregulated pathways are in clinical development. In the past, many novel compounds have not met expectations; nonetheless, with the rapid developments in comprehensive molecular profiling and new drug design, there is the prospect of personalizing therapy and improving patient outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document