The value of the left atrial appendage orifice perimeter of 3D model based on 3D TEE data in the choice of device size of LAmbre™ occluder

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 1841-1851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Jia ◽  
Qing Zhou ◽  
Hong-ning Song ◽  
Lan Zhang ◽  
Jin-ling Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Atrial ◽  
3D Model ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Device Size

scholarly journals Safety and effects of volume loading during transesophageal echocardiography in the pre-procedural work-up for left atrial appendage closure

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Afonso B. Freitas-Ferraz ◽  
Mathieu Bernier ◽  
Kim O’Connor ◽  
Jonathan Beaudoin ◽  
Jean Champagne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Maximum Diameter ◽  
Volume Loading ◽  
Fluid Bolus ◽  
Work Up ◽  
Device Size ◽  
Laa Closure

Abstract Background In patients undergoing left atrial appendage (LAA) closure, an accurate sizing of the LAA is key to optimize device sizing, procedural success and reduce complications. Previous studies have shown that intraprocedural volume loading increases LAA dimensions and improves device sizing. However, the safety and effects on LAA and device sizing of administering a fluid bolus during pre-procedural transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and impact on LAA dimensions and device sizing of an intravenous (IV) fluid bolus administered during TEE in the setting of the pre-procedural work-up for LAA closure. Methods The study included a total of 72 patients who underwent TEE to assess suitability for LAAC and received a 500 ml IV bolus of normal saline. The LAA landing zone (LZ) and depth were measured by TEE before and after volume loading, and these measurements were used to predict the device size implanted during a subsequent percutaneous LAAC procedure. Results There were no complications associated with volume loading. The baseline mean LZ was 19.6 ± 3.6 mm at 90o, and 20.2 ± 4.1 mm at 135o. Following fluid bolus, the maximum diameter increased 1.5 ± 1.0 mm at 90o (p<0.001), and 1.3 ± 1.0 mm at 135o (p<0.001). The baseline mean depth of the LAA was 26.5 ± 5.5 mm at 90o, and 23.9 ± 5.8 mm at 135o. After fluid bolus, the mean depth increased by 1.5 ± 1.8 mm (p<0.001) and 1.6 ± 2.0 (p<0.001), at 90o and 135o, respectively. Sizing based on post-bolus measurements of the LZ significantly improved the agreement with the final device size selection during the procedure in 71.0% of cases (vs. 42.0% with pre-bolus measurements). Conclusions Volume loading during ambulatory TEE as part of the pre-procedural work-up of LAAC is safe and significantly increases LAA dimensions. This strategy may become the new standard, particularly in centers performing LAAC with no TEE guidance, as it improves LAA sizing and more accurately predicts the final device size.

P3730Left atrial appendage perimeter measurement by cardiac CT is superior to transesophageal echocardiography for Watchman device sizing

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Seibolt ◽  
D Verma ◽  
W Mulroy ◽  
A Loli
Keyword(s):  
Left Atrial ◽  
Cardiac Ct ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Landing Zone ◽  
Pearson Coefficient ◽  
Watchman Device ◽  
Very High ◽  
Device Size

Abstract Background Left atrial appendage occlusion with Watchman device traditionally relies on accurate left atrial appendage (LAA) ostium diameter measurement by 2D or 3D transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE). Alternate methods of ostium measurement including area-derived diameter and perimeter-derived diameter using cardiac computed tomography (CT) have been proposed. Purpose We aim to use CT technology with an advanced medical imaging application to measure LAA ostium perimeter for improved pre-procedural device sizing. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 92 patients with atrial fibrillation (Afib) who underwent Watchman implantation with pre-procedural TEE and cardiac CT between May 2015 and December 2018. LAA characteristics including ostial or landing zone perimeter, minimum and maximum diameters were acquired utilizing 3mensio Structural Heart Imaging Program. Proposed Watchman device size was estimated utilizing ostium perimeter by CT and compared to the current standard utilizing ostium diameter by 2D-TEE. Both measurements were then compared to actual implanted Watchman device size which met the P.A.S.S. criteria of position, anchor, size and seal. Results Watchman device sizing based on novel LAA landing zone perimeter size by CT had a very high correlation with the actual implanted Watchman size (Pearson coefficient r=0.94, p<0.001). Traditional TEE based Watchman sizing only had a modest correlation with the implanted Watchman size (Pearson coefficient r=0.66, p<0.001). CT predicted Watchman size had a significantly higher agreement compared to current standard TEE based sizing (93.4% vs 47.8%), inter-rater agreement was very high for CT based Watchman sizing compared to current standard TEE based sizing (Cohen's kappa = 0.91 vs Cohen's kappa = 0.32, p<0.001, p<0.001 respectively). Bland-Altman analysis also showed better correlation with CT based sizing compared to TEE (see Figure 1). Figure 1 Conclusion CT LAA perimeter sizing is superior to the current standard TEE based Watchman sizing. Larger, multi-center studies may be necessary to further validate our results.

Printed MDCT 3D models for prediction of left atrial appendage (LAA) occluder device size: a feasibility study

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. e1076-e1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orly Goitein ◽  
Noam Fink ◽  
Victor Guetta ◽  
Roy Beinart ◽  
Yafim Brodov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Feasibility Study ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
3D Models ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Occluder Device ◽  
Device Size

scholarly journals Clinical Impact of Preprocedural CT-Based 3D Computational Simulation of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion with Amulet

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Ian Buysschaert ◽  
Dries Viaene
Keyword(s):  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Computational Simulation ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Size Selection ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion ◽  
Degree Of Confidence ◽  
Implanted Device ◽  
Device Size

Aims. Standard of care (SoC) device size selection with transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) and computed tomography (CT) in LAAO can be challenging due to a certain degree of variability at both patient and device levels. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical impact of 3D computational modelling software in the decision-making of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with Amplatzer Amulet. Methods and Results. SoC preprocedural assessments as well as CT-based 3D computational simulations (FEops) were performed in 15 consecutive patients scheduled for LAAO with Amulet. Preprocedural device size selection and degree of confidence were determined after SoC and after FEops-based assessments and compared to the implanted device. FEops-based preprocedural assessment correctly selected the implanted device size in 11 out of 15 patients (73.3%), compared to 7 patients (46.7%) for SoC-based assessment. In 4 patients (26.7%), FEops induced a change in device size initially selected by SoC. In the 7 patients (46.7%) in which FEops confirmed the SoC device size selection, the degree of confidence of the size selection increased from 6.4 ± 1.4 for SoC to 8.1 ± 0.7 for FEops. One patient (6.7%) could not be implanted for anatomical reason, as correctly identified by FEops. Conclusions. Preprocedural 3D computational simulation by FEops impacts Amulet size selection in LAAO compared to TOE and CT-based SoC assessment. Operators could consider FEops computational simulation in their preprocedural device size selection.

scholarly journals Pre-procedural Determination of Device Size in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Using Three-dimensional Cardiac Computed Tomography

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iksung Cho ◽  
William D. Kim ◽  
Oh Hyun Lee ◽  
Min Jae Cha ◽  
Jiwon Seo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Cardiac Ct ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Cardiac Computed Tomography ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Landing Zone ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion ◽  
Device Size

Abstract Background: The two-dimensional-based LAAO size prediction system using transesophageal echocardiography is limited by the complex structure of the left atrial appendage (LAA). The LAA anatomy can be evaluated more precisely using three-dimensional images from cardiac CT; however, a CT-based sizing method has not been established. We aimed to assess the accuracy of measurements derived from cardiac computed tomography (CT) images for selecting left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 62 patients with Amplatzer Cardiac Plug and Amulet LAAO devices who underwent implantation from 2017 to 2020. The minimal, maximal, average, area-derived, and perimeter-derived diameters of the LAA landing zone were measured using CT-based images. Predicted device sizes using sizing charts were compared with actual successfully implanted device sizes.Results: The mean size of implanted devices was 27.1 ± 3.7 mm. The perimeter-derived diameter predicted device size most accurately (mean error = -0.8 ± 2.4 mm). All other parameters showed significantly larger error (mean error; minimal diameter = -4.9 ± 3.3 mm, maximal diameter = 1.0 ± 2.9 mm, average diameter = -1.6 ± 2.6 mm, area-derived diameter = -2.0 ± 2.6 mm) than the perimeter-derived diameter (all p for difference <0.05). The error for other parameters were larger in cases with more eccentrically-shaped landing zones, while the perimeter-derived diameter had minor error regardless of eccentricity. When oversizing was used, all parameters showed significant disagreement.Conclusions: The perimeter-derived diameter on cardiac CT images provided the most accurate estimation of LAAO device size regardless of landing zone eccentricity. Oversizing was unnecessary when using cardiac CT to predict an accurate LAAO size.

scholarly journals A platform for real-3d visualization and planning of left atrial appendage occlusion through mixed reality

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
O Pappalardo ◽  
M Pasquali ◽  
A Maltagliati ◽  
G Rossini ◽  
G Italiano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Atrial ◽  
Morphological Analysis ◽  
3D Model ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Mixed Reality ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Slice Thickness ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion ◽  
Planning Phase ◽  
Marching Cube Algorithm

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background In left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO), pre-procedural computed tomography (CT) is pivotal to describe the complex and highly variable LAA anatomy and to guide the operator in accurate planning of the intervention. Multiplanar reconstruction and 3D rendering are used for the navigation and analysis of the 3D datasets but they share some limitations that are due to the use of 2D screens; Mixed Reality (MxR) technology aims at overcoming such limitations by allowing for real-3D visualizations with holographic replicas of anatomical models while preserving a sense of presence within the true physical environment by the operator. Purpose To develop and test a MxR platform that provides a more intuitive and informative tool for the morphological analysis during the planning phase of LAAO. Methods Patients (n = 4) were randomly selected among those referred for a CT scan prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement, each one characterized by a specific LAA morphology (cauliflower, bilobular, chicken wing, wind-sock). CT scans were performed in diastole at 75% of the R-R interval on a 64-slice scanner, with in-plane resolution 0.38-0.64 mm and slice thickness 0.62 mm. Firstly, the acquisition was cropped to contain the left atrium, the circumflex artery, the left upper pulmonary ridge. Subsequently, an isosurface with high coincidence between the blood cavity border and the endocardium was identified by the user and processed using a marching cube algorithm to obtain the 3D model. Finally, the 3D model was optimized for a MxR platform that allows for moving, zooming and cutting the model, measuring the main LAA linear dimensions and simulating the implant of a virtual replica of a transcatheter occluder. Results   The workflow was successfully applied for all the patients independently from the morphology. All the models were successfully uploaded in the MxR platform (Fig 1.a) and for all the patients the morphological analysis was performed (Fig 1.b) in less than 10 minutes. The four different morphologies of the LAA were correctly identified allowing a very detailed holographic modeling of the structure, including the neck, the landing zone, the curvature and the position and size of lobes. For both the identified ostium and landing planes, using a dedicated measuring tool (Fig. 1.c), the operator measured the minimum and maximum diameters, which were later used to define the size of the occluder device to be used in the virtual implant simulation (Fig. 1.d). Conclusions The tested MxR platform suggested the potential to overcome the limits of the standard technologies in planning of LAAO thanks to the real-3D perception, potentially leading to a more accurate and faster planning phase. Furthermore, the use of MxR technology may enhance the ability to predict the optimal device size and position within the anatomy to obtain LAA complete sealing. Abstract Figure.

scholarly journals Left Atrial Appendage Morphology With The Progression of Atrial Fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoichi Takaya ◽  
Rie Nakayama ◽  
Fumi Yokohama ◽  
Norihisa Toh ◽  
Koji Nakagawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Transesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Therapeutic Strategy ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Determining The Indication ◽  
Device Size ◽  
Laa Closure

Abstract Left atrial appendage (LAA) size is crucial for determining the indication of transcatheter LAA closure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in LAA morphology according to the types of atrial fibrillation (AF). A total of 340 patients (mean age: 65 ± 15 years) who underwent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) were included. Patients were classified into non-AF (n = 105), paroxysmal AF (n = 86), persistent AF (n = 87), or long-standing persistent AF (n = 62). LAA morphology, including LAA ostial diameter and depth, was assessed using TEE. Patients with long-standing persistent AF had larger LAA ostial diameter and depth, greater LAA lobes, and lower LAA flow velocity. The maximum LAA ostial diameter was 19 ± 4 mm in patients with non-AF, 21 ± 4 mm in patients with paroxysmal AF, 23 ± 5 mm in patients with persistent AF, and 26 ± 5 mm in patients with long-standing persistent AF. LAA ostial diameter was increased by 2 or 3 mm with the progression of AF. LAA ostial diameter was correlated with LA volume index (r = 0.37, p < 0.01) and the duration of continuous AF (r = 0.30, p < 0.01), but not with age or the period from the onset of AF. In conclusion, LAA size, which is the determinant for selecting device size of transcatheter LAA closure, was increased with the progression of AF. Our findings have potential implications for therapeutic strategy of transcatheter LAA closure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document