scholarly journals Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on quality of life and emotional wellbeing in patients with bone metastases treated with radiotherapy: a prospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-217
Author(s):  
M. M. T. J. Bartels ◽  
R. Gal ◽  
J. M. van der Velden ◽  
J. J. C. Verhoeff ◽  
J. J. Verlaan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Emotional Functioning ◽  
Disease Patient ◽  
Strong Increase ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
General Quality

AbstractImplementation of COVID-19 measures may have induced concerns about access and quality of health care for cancer patients with bone metastases, and it may have affected their quality of life. In this study, we evaluated the effect of the first COVID-19 lockdown on quality of life and emotional functioning of patients with stage IV cancer treated for painful bone metastases in the UMC Utrecht, the Netherlands. A COVID-19 specific questionnaire was sent to active participants in the Prospective Evaluation of interventional StudiEs on boNe meTastases (PRESENT) cohort, consisting of patients irradiated for metastatic bone disease. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) were compared with the last two PROs collected within the PRESENT cohort before the COVID-19 lockdown in the Netherlands on the 16th of March. For the 169 (53%) responders, median age at start of lockdown was 68 years (range 38–92) and 62% were male. Patients reported a statistically significant decrease in emotional functioning (83.6 to 79.2, P = 0.004) and in general quality of life score during the COVID-19 lockdown (72.4 to 68.7, P = 0.007). A steep increase in feeling isolated was reported (18% before and 67% during lockdown). This study has shown a strong increase in the experience of isolation and a decrease of emotional functioning and general quality of life during the COVID-19 lockdown in cancer patients with bone metastases. Due to the nature of the treatment of this patient population, efforts should be made to minimize these changes during future lockdowns.

Assessing the impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting on patients’ quality of life: An Arabic version of the Functional Living Index-Emesis

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522199844
Author(s):  
Abdullah M Alhammad ◽  
Nora Alkhudair ◽  
Rawan Alzaidi ◽  
Latifa S Almosabhi ◽  
Mohammad H Aljawadi
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Arabic Language ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Arabic Version ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Arabic Speaking ◽  
The Impact

Introduction Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is a serious complication of cancer treatment that compromises patients’ quality of life and treatment adherence, which necessitates regular assessment. Therefore, there is a need to assess patient-reported nausea and vomiting using a validated scale among Arabic speaking cancer patient population. The objective of this study was to translate and validate the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) instrument in Arabic, a patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess the influence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting on patients’ quality of life. Methods Linguistic validation of an Arabic-language version was performed. The instrument was administered to cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in a tertiary hospital's cancer center in Saudi Arabia. Results One-hundred cancer patients who received chemotherapy were enrolled. The participants’ mean age was 53.3 ± 14.9 years, and 50% were female. Half of the participants had a history of nausea and vomiting with previous chemotherapy. The Cronbach coefficient alpha for the FLIE was 0.9606 and 0.9736 for nausea and vomiting domains, respectively, which indicated an excellent reliability for the Arabic FLIE. The mean FLIE score was 110.9 ± 23.5, indicating no or minimal impact on daily life (NIDL). Conclusions The Arabic FLIE is a valid and reliable tool among the Arabic-speaking cancer population. Thus, the Arabic version of the FLIE will be a useful tool to assess the quality of life among Arabic speaking patients receiving chemotherapy. Additionally, the translated instrument will be a useful tool for future research studies to explore new antiemetic treatments among cancer patients.

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Outcomes, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Clinical Outcomes for Urothelial Cancer Patients Receiving Chemo- or Immunotherapy: A Real-Life Experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1852
Author(s):  
Gry Assam Taarnhøj ◽  
Henriette Lindberg ◽  
Christoffer Johansen ◽  
Helle Pappot
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Life Experience ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Oncological Treatment ◽  
Patient Reported

Patients with urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC) often have comorbidities, which cause trouble for the completion of oncological treatment, and little is known about their quality of life (QoL). The aim of the present study was to obtain and describe patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and QoL data from UCC patients in the treatment for locally advanced muscle-invasive or metastatic UCC. A total of 79 patients with UCC completed four questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BLM30, HADS, and select PRO-CTCAE™ questions) once weekly during their treatment. From those, 26 patients (33%) underwent neoadjuvant treatment for local disease while 53 patients (67%) were treated for metastatic disease. Of all patients, 54% did not complete the planned treatment due to progression, nephrotoxicity, death, or intolerable symptoms during treatment. The five most prevalent PRO-CTCAE grade ≥ 2 symptoms were frequent urination (37%), fatigue (35%), pain (31%), dry mouth (23%), and swelling of the arms or legs (23%). The baseline mean overall QoL was 61 (±SD 24) for all patients (neoadjuvant (73, ±SD 19) and metastatic (54, ±SD 24)) and remained stable over the course of treatment for both groups. A stable overall QoL was observed for the patients in this study. More than half of the patients did not, however, complete the planned treatment. Further supportive care is warranted for bladder cancer patients.

scholarly journals Improving quality of life in cancer patients through higher participation and health literacy: study protocol for evaluating the oncological social care project (OSCAR)

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johann Frick ◽  
Daniel Schindel ◽  
Pimrapat Gebert ◽  
Ulrike Grittner ◽  
Liane Schenk
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Social Care ◽  
The Social ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Mixed Method Design ◽  
Insurance Funds ◽  
Health Insurance Funds

Abstract Background Cancer patients experience psychological and social distress due to their medical treatment and social issues. However, continuous and specialized social support is still lacking. In Germany, a group of company health insurance funds has developed an approach to support cancer patients with monthly structured interviews conducted by specially trained Social Care Nurses. The nurses will identify patient needs in order to provide help with medical, personal, and social matters. One aim of the scientific evaluation is to analyze the effect of the consultations on various patient-reported outcomes, especially quality of life. The evaluation concept will be described in this study protocol. Methods/design The evaluation is a non-randomized, controlled, multi-center intervention study with a mixed-method design. It consists of three research modules which include primary data from questionnaires, and claims data from the health insurance funds. In Module 1, cancer patients will be recruited to form an intervention group (OSCAR, n = 150) and a control group (n = 200) in four study centers for a period of 1 year. One baseline and three follow-up questionnaires will be conducted to survey the patient-reported outcomes. Relevant secondary outcomes are health literacy, participation, and physician-patient communication. In Module 2, claims data will be used to analyze cost effects and thereby assess effectivity and hospitalization. Module 3 will involve a qualitative analysis of project diaries kept by the Social Care Nurses. The diaries will record the nurses’ practical experiences and the benefits of deploying OSCAR across the German healthcare system. Discussion OSCAR is an innovative way of providing cancer patients with continuous support to improve their quality of life. The evaluation concept aims to assess the effects of the monthly consultations by the Social Care Nurses on the patients, and will use a mixed-method design. The results are important for assessing the transferability of OSCAR to the healthcare system as a whole. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00013640). Registered 29 December 2017.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Quality of Life of Gynecological Cancer Patients Submitted to Antineoplastic Chemotherapy

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 849-855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lívia Loamí Ruyz Jorge ◽  
Sueli Riul da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gynecological Cancer ◽  
World Health ◽  
Outpatient Chemotherapy ◽  
General Quality ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Professional Interventions ◽  
Antineoplastic Chemotherapy

This study aimed to evaluate the quality of life of female gynecological cancer patients submitted to antineoplastic chemotherapy Between August 2007 and April 2009, 50 patients who were undergoing chemotherapy at an outpatient chemotherapy unit in Uberaba - MG were interviewed, by applying the instrument of evaluation of Quality of Life of the World Health Organization, WHOQOL-BREF. The results showed that the domain most affected was the Physical and the more preserved, the Social, with the mean of the general quality of life above the means obtained in other studies. All domains correlated significantly with the general quality of life. It was evident then that the quality of life of these women is satisfactory, however it is suggested that the domains with lower scores be the targets of more accurate observations during multi-professional interventions in order to provide a better quality of life during the chemotherapy treatment.

Automatic inpatient palliative care consultation (PCC): Too little, too late to impact quality of life for advanced cancer patients?

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20565-e20565
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Betty Rocque ◽  
Toby Christopher Campbell ◽  
Anne Elizabeth Barnett ◽  
Renae M Quale ◽  
Jens C. Eickhoff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Small Patient Population

e20565 Background: Patients with advanced cancer who are hospitalized have high symptom burden and a short life expectancy, which may warrant PCC. Methods: Using sequential cohorts, we prospectively assessed implementation of automatic PCC for hospitalized cancer patients. The primary outcome was hospice utilization. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of changes in quality of life (FACIT-PAL), symptoms (ESAS), satisfaction (FAMCARE), and anxiety and depression (HADS). Surveys were administered at baseline, 2 weeks and 3 months post-hospitalization. Chart abstraction was utilized to assess demographics, resource use, and survival information. Results: Patients were evaluated consecutively (65 in the control group, 70 in the intervention). At admission, 91% reported uncontrolled symptoms: 52% pain; 15% dyspnea. 60% of intervention patients received PCC during their first admission. 54 patients completed surveys (29 control group, 25 PCC group), 64 patients declined or were unable to complete surveys, 16 patients were excluded due to language barriers, physician preference, or not receiving surveys. Using an intent-to-treat analysis, there was no difference between patients in the control and the intervention group in FACIT-PAL (119 ± 29 vs 123 ± 30, p = 0.68 ), ESAS (28 ± 14 vs 26 ± 15, p = 0.74) HADS (13 ± 6.6 vs. 12.± 4.7, p = 0.58), or FAMCARE (58 ± 9.1 vs 59 ± 8.6, p = 0.61). In both groups, patients had modest worsening of symptoms and quality of life over the course of the study. Survival and Health Services data analysis, including hospice referral, is proceeding. Conclusions: Automatic PPC had little impact on patient-reported symptoms and quality of life. Limitations included: small patient population; high rate of incomplete surveys, likely due to illness burden; penetration of the PCC was limited to 60% by patient or provider preference and consultant availability. Our primary outcome analysis (hospice utilization) is forthcoming, as are data on survival and Health Services outcomes.

Implementation of the VA Symptom Assessment Scale (VSAS): Five-year experience.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23120-e23120
Author(s):  
Daphne Ruth Friedman ◽  
Vikas Patil ◽  
Kelli Marie Rasmussen ◽  
Brian C Sauer ◽  
Michael J. Kelley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Assessment Scale ◽  
Veterans Health ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Clinical Tool ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Symptom Assessment Scale

e23120 Background: Cancer patients experience symptoms which may precede diagnosis, occur during therapy, and persist into survivorship. Symptom assessments and patient reported outcomes have been shown to improve quality of life and extend survival in cancer patients. The Veterans Administration Symptom Assessment Scale (VSAS) is a clinical tool to document cancer-related symptoms. Here, we report VSAS adoption in five Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hematology-oncology sites during a five-year period. Methods: Data was collected from the Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW): VSAS data, date of birth, gender, race, ethnicity, vital status, year of cancer diagnosis, ICD-O-3, VHA facility, and clinic stop codes. Descriptive analyses of patient demographics, disease characteristics, and VSAS utilization was performed. VSAS is comprised of 13 symptoms, rated on a 0 to 10 scale. A VSAS visit was defined as the date the VSAS was administered to a patient. Results: From January 2013 through June 2018, there were 41,917 instances of VSAS administered to 9,409 unique patients at five VHA facilities: 8,512 (90.5%) were male; 5,241 (56%) were non-Hispanic White, 3,743 (40%) were Black, and 297 (3%) were other racial categories or not available. The median age at the first VSAS visit was 67 years. In patients whose oncologic diagnosis was recorded by a cancer registrar (4,536), the most common diagnoses were prostate cancer, lung cancer (all histologies), colon cancer, and multiple myeloma. The number of VSAS administrations increased annually, from 866 in 2013 to 12,775 in 2017, which may be attributed to increased adoption of VSAS across and within VHA facilities. Individual patients completed the VSAS 1-57 times (median 2). At the five VHA facilities utilizing VSAS in 2017, VSAS was administered at 56% of hematology-oncology clinic visits. Conclusions: VSAS is a tool to measure and document patient symptom burden, and has been successfully adopted in the last five years at select VHA facilities. Expanded use of VSAS throughout the VHA is an important step in improving the quality of life and extending survival of veterans with cancer and blood disorders.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document