Contaminant exposure as an additional stressor to bats affected by white-nose syndrome: current evidence and knowledge gaps

Ecotoxicology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashleigh B. Cable ◽  
Emma V. Willcox ◽  
Christy Leppanen
2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 315-319
Author(s):  
Shamsher S. Dalai ◽  
Rajesh Kumar ◽  
Daljit Singh

After more than half a century of use of oxygen in neonates, there are many areas related to oxygen therapy in neonates in which the available information based on current evidence remains inadequate. To address the knowledge gaps that prevent optimal, evidence-based care in this critical field, National Neonatology forum, India is bringing out a set of guidelines on Oxygen therapy in neonates. The present article, which is based on these guidelines, proposes to review oxygen therapy in neonates including what is presently known on this topic, gaps in knowledge and researchable issues.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 2177
Author(s):  
Victor Garcia-Bustos ◽  
Marta D. Cabanero-Navalon ◽  
Amparo Ruiz-Saurí ◽  
Alba C. Ruiz-Gaitán ◽  
Miguel Salavert ◽  
...  

Candida auris has unprecedently emerged as a multidrug resistant fungal pathogen, considered a serious global threat due to its potential to cause nosocomial outbreaks and deep-seated infections with staggering transmissibility and mortality, that has put health authorities and institutions worldwide in check for more than a decade now. Due to its unique features not observed in other yeasts, it has been categorised as an urgent threat by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other international agencies. Moreover, epidemiological alerts have been released in view of the increase of healthcare-associated C. auris outbreaks in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. This review summarises the current evidence on C. auris since its first description, from virulence to treatment and outbreak control, and highlights the knowledge gaps and future directions for research efforts.


2018 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. 76-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Leader ◽  
H. ten Cate ◽  
G. Spectre ◽  
E.A.M. Beckers ◽  
A. Falanga

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 665-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Akers ◽  
Rustam Al-Shahi Salman ◽  
Issam A. Awad ◽  
Kristen Dahlem ◽  
Kelly Flemming ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: Despite many publications about cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs), controversy remains regarding diagnostic and management strategies. OBJECTIVE: To develop guidelines for CCM management. METHODS: The Angioma Alliance (www.angioma.org), the patient support group in the United States advocating on behalf of patients and research in CCM, convened a multidisciplinary writing group comprising expert CCM clinicians to help summarize the existing literature related to the clinical care of CCM, focusing on 5 topics: (1) epidemiology and natural history, (2) genetic testing and counseling, (3) diagnostic criteria and radiology standards, (4) neurosurgical considerations, and (5) neurological considerations. The group reviewed literature, rated evidence, developed recommendations, and established consensus, controversies, and knowledge gaps according to a prespecified protocol. RESULTS: Of 1270 publications published between January 1, 1983 and September 31, 2014, we selected 98 based on methodological criteria, and identified 38 additional recent or relevant publications. Topic authors used these publications to summarize current knowledge and arrive at 23 consensus management recommendations, which we rated by class (size of effect) and level (estimate of certainty) according to the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association criteria. No recommendation was level A (because of the absence of randomized controlled trials), 11 (48%) were level B, and 12 (52%) were level C. Recommendations were class I in 8 (35%), class II in 10 (43%), and class III in 5 (22%). CONCLUSION: Current evidence supports recommendations for the management of CCM, but their generally low levels and classes mandate further research to better inform clinical practice and update these recommendations. The complete recommendations document, including the criteria for selecting reference citations, a more detailed justification of the respective recommendations, and a summary of controversies and knowledge gaps, was similarly peer reviewed and is available on line www.angioma.org/CCMGuidelines.


2014 ◽  
Vol 204 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 55-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.K. Nielsen ◽  
C.R. Reinemeyer ◽  
J.M. Donecker ◽  
D.M. Leathwick ◽  
A.A. Marchiondo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document