Dry Needling and Antithrombotic Drugs

Many clinicians increasingly use dry needling in clinical practice. However, whether patients’ intake of antithrombotic drugs should be considered as a contraindication for dry needling has not been investigated to date. As far as we know, there are no publications in analyzing the intake of antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents in the context of dry needling techniques. A thorough analysis of existing medications and how they may impact various needling approaches may contribute to improved evidence-informed clinical practice. The primary purpose of this paper is to review the current knowledge of antithrombotic therapy in the context of dry needling. In addition, reviewing guidelines of other needling approaches, such as electromyography, acupuncture, botulinum toxin infiltration, and neck ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy, may provide specific insights relevant for dry needling. Based on published data, taking antithrombotic medication should not be considered an absolute contraindication for dry needling techniques. As long as specific dry needling and individual risks are properly considered, it does not change the risk and safety profile of dry needling. Under specific circumstances, the use of ultrasound guidance is recommended when available.

Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke

After an ischemic stroke is diagnosed, a diagnostic evaluation ensues to determine the mechanism of the stroke and contributing risk factors. The appropriate antithrombotic is selected in accordance with the mechanism of the stroke, and the contributing risk factors are treated with pharmacologic agents and lifestyle changes. This chapter discusses the selection of antithrombotic medication, medical treatment, and lifestyle changes for contributing risk factors.

Serotonergic Antidepressants and Risk for Traumatic Intracranial Bleeding

Background: Serotonergic antidepressants may predispose to bleeding but the effect on traumatic intracranial bleeding is unknown.Methods: The rate of intracranial bleeding in patients with antidepressant medication was compared to patients not antidepressants in a cohort of patients with acute head injury. This association was examined by using a consecutive cohort of head trauma patients from a Finnish tertiary center emergency department (Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland). All consecutive (2010–2012) adult patients (n = 2,890; median age = 58; male = 56%, CT-positive = 22%, antithrombotic medication users = 25%, antidepressant users = 10%) who underwent head CT due to head trauma in the emergency department were included.Results: Male gender, GCS <15, older age, and anticoagulation were associated with an increased risk for traumatic intracranial bleeding. There were 17.8% of patients not taking antidepressants and 18.3% of patients on an antidepressant who had traumatic intracranial bleeding (p = 0.830). Among patients who were taking antithrombotic medication, 16.6% of the patients not taking antidepressant medication, and 22.5% of the patients taking antidepressant medication, had bleeding (p = 0.239). In a regression analysis, traumatic intracranial hemorrhage was not associated with antidepressant use.Conclusions: Serotonergic antidepressant use was not associated with an increased risk of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.

Caudal Epidural Steroid Injections in the Setting of Remaining on Antithrombotics: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND: The American Society of Regional Anesthesia currently recommends ceasing antithrombotic medications for all spinal epidural steroid injections, however there is a paucity of data on the true risk of spinal epidurals via various approaches versus the risk of cessation of an agent as it relates to the underlying medical condition. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the complication rate of caudal epidural steroid injections in patients who remain on antithrombotic medications. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Physiatric Spine Clinic in Orthopedic Specialty Office and Surgical Center. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed identifying patients (n = 335) who received a caudal epidural steroid injection (n = 673) from June 2015 through April 2020. Patients were included if they had received the injection while taking an antithrombotic medication. Patients were excluded if they were not taking an antithrombotic. The patient’s age, indication for the injection including magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography findings, antithrombotic medication, the medical condition requiring an antithrombotic, and any complications following the injection were collected via chart review. RESULTS: Of the 443 injections included in the study, 51 encounters were lost to follow-up. Of the other 392 injections, there were no reported complications, regardless of the patient’s imaging findings, age, the antithrombotic medication used, or the underlying medical condition for which an antithrombotic medication was indicated. LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective study. Therefore, a prospective study may have yielded fewer encounters lost to follow-up. Patients were not contacted directly after the procedure and chart reviews were utilized to evaluate for complications, which was limited to a patient’s reporting of perceived complications without any imaging. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that caudal epidural steroid injections can be performed safely in patients while taking antithrombotic medications. Catastrophic events have been observed in patients who have discontinued antithrombotic agents preceding procedures. Thus, discontinuing antithrombotic medications may pose a greater risk than benefit for patients on an antithrombotic medication who have painful lumbar radiculopathy. KEY WORDS: Epidural injection, caudal, antithrombotic, safety, steroids, anticoagulant, antiplatelet, epidural hematoma

Relevance of comorbidities and antithrombotic medication as risk factors for reoperation in patients with chronic subdural hematoma

In an aging Western society, the incidence of chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH) is continuously increasing. In this study, we reviewed our clinical management of cSDH patients and identified predictive factors for the need of reoperation due to residual or recurrent hematomas with a focus on the use of antithrombotic drugs. In total, 623 patients who were treated for cSDH with surgical evacuation between 2006 and 2016 at our department were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and radiological characteristics and laboratory parameters were investigated as possible predictors of reoperation with univariate and multivariate analyses. Additionally, clinical outcome measures were compared between patients on anticoagulants, on antiplatelets, and without antithrombotic medication. In univariate analyses, patients on anticoagulants and antiplatelets presented significantly more often with comorbidities, were significantly older, and their risk for perioperative complications was significantly increased. Nevertheless, their clinical outcome was comparable to that of patients without antithrombotics. In multivariate analysis, only the presence of comorbidities, but not antithrombotics, was an independent predictor for the need for reoperations. Patients on antithrombotics do not seem to necessarily have a significantly increased risk for residual hematomas or rebleeding requiring reoperation after cSDH evacuation. More precisely, the presence of predisposing comorbidities might be a key independent risk factor for reoperation. Importantly, the clinical outcomes after surgical evacuation of cSDH are comparable between patients on anticoagulants, antiplatelets, and without antithrombotics.

Access Site Complications of Peripheral Endovascular Procedures: A Large, Prospective Registry on Predictors and Consequences

Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate predictors and consequences of acute vascular access site complications (ASCs) related to peripheral endovascular diagnostic or interventional procedures. Despite improvement of puncture techniques, access site–related morbidity and mortality is still considerable. Materials and Methods A total of 5263 participants who underwent 5385 endovascular procedures at a single center were consecutively included in this prospective, observational study. Primary outcomes were ASCs defined as composite of puncture site hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, and overt puncture site bleeding on the first day after procedure. Results ASCs occurred in 16.6% of peripheral endovascular procedures (78.6% hematomas, 18.9% pseudoaneurysms, 1.4% arteriovenous fistulas, 1.1% overt bleedings). Independent predictors were advanced age [odds ratio (OR) per 10 years: 1.12, p=0.004], female sex (OR men, 0.77; p=0.001), lysis (OR 3.56; p<0.001), periprocedural heparin (OR 5000 IU, 1.96; p=0.001; OR >5000 IU, 3.56; p=0.02), time to access (OR per 10 seconds, 1.01; p<0.001), sheath size (OR per French, 1.59; p<0.001), brachial artery access (OR vs retrograde transfemoral, 4.58; p<0.001), and compression only (OR Angio-Seal, 0.57, p=0.02; ProGlide, 0.36, p<0.001; FemoSeal, 0.57, p<0.001). Treatment was required in 20.2% and prolonged hospitalization in 17.7% of ASC. Three participants died from access site–related bleeding. Conclusion ASCs after peripheral endovascular procedures are associated with advanced age, female sex, periprocedural antithrombotic medication, brachial artery access, postinterventional bleeding, and nonuse of vascular closure devices.

Von Willebrand factor, ADAMTS13 and mortality in dialysis patients

Background Von Willebrand Factor (VWF) multimers are cleaved into smaller and less coagulant forms by the metalloprotease ADAMTS13. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between VWF and ADAMTS13 and mortality in dialysis patients. Methods We prospectively followed 956 dialysis patients. VWF levels and ADAMTS13 activity were measured. Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) to investigate the association between quartiles of VWF levels and ADAMTS13 activity and all-cause mortality. HRs were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, cardiovascular disease, dialysis modality, primary kidney disease, use of antithrombotic medication, systolic blood pressure, albumin, C-reactive protein and residual GFR. Results Of the 956 dialysis patients, 288 dialysis patients died within three years (mortality rate 151 per 1000 person-years). The highest quartile of VWF as compared with lower levels of VWF was associated with a 1.4-fold (95 %CI 1.1–1.8) increased mortality risk after adjustment. The lowest quartile of ADAMTS13 activity as compared with other quartiles was associated with a 1.3-fold (95 %CI 1.0-1.7) increased mortality risk after adjustment. The combination of the highest VWF quartile and lowest ADAMTS13 quartile was associated with a 2.0-fold (95 %CI 1.3-3.0) increased mortality risk as compared with the combination of the lowest VWF quartile and highest ADAMTS13 quartile. Conclusions High VWF levels and low ADAMTS13 activity were associated with increased mortality risks in dialysis patients.

Do statins reduce the rate of revision surgery after chronic subdural hematoma drain?

Background With chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), surgery is the therapeutic mainstay for large or symptomatic cases. Statins are reported to be effective as the primary therapy of CSDH to obviate the need for surgery. However, the effect of statins on the postoperative course of CSDH is largely unclear. We therefore sought to determine whether statins reduce the rate of repeat surgery after CSDH drain. Methods We performed an analysis of all patients who underwent surgery for CSDH at our institution between 2012 and 2018. The patients were separated into those who received statins as part of their previous medication (statin group) and those who did not (control group). The medical records were reviewed for repeat surgeries and complications. Additionally, patients or their relatives were contacted via phone to obtain missing data and inquire about possible repeat surgeries at other institutions. Results We identified 407 patients who received CSDH evacuation via burr hole craniotomy. In total, 123 patients were treated with statins as part of their daily medication. Repeat surgery was performed in 26 patients in the statin group (21.1%) and 57 patients in the non-statin group (20.1%, p = 0.81). Upon multivariate logistic regression analysis, neither of the variables statins, age, antithrombotic medication, Charlson comorbidity index, or Markwalder grading score yielded a statistically significant effect upon the revision rate. Conclusions We found no evidence for the protective effect of statins in patients who underwent surgery for CSDH. We thus conclude that statin therapy is not warranted for CSDH perioperatively.

An Update for UK Podiatrists Performing Toenail Surgery on Patients Who Are Taking Antithrombotic Medications: It’s About Bleeding Time

Nail surgery for the permanent removal of all or part of the nail unit can be performed via incisional or physically ablative techniques for conditions such as ingrown, mycotic, or dystrophic toenails. In the United Kingdom podiatric community, where phenol techniques are the standard of care for ablation of the matrix, there remains confusion about the management of patients undergoing nail surgery who are concurrently taking antithrombotic medication(s). The aim of this paper was to review the literature describing treatment strategies for antithrombosed patients undergoing nail surgery. However, having found limited evidence, the authors considered relevant and associated literature in the field of cutaneous/dermatological surgery and extrapolated those findings for patients undergoing nail avulsion surgery. A case-by-case risk assessment is warranted in all patients but as a general rule, the podiatrist can perform nail surgery without the patientceasing their antithrombotic medication.

The Effect of Symptom Onset-to-needle time on Ischemic Outcomes in Patients Treated with Primary Angioplasty in the Era of Potent Antiplatelets

Purpose: Based on previous studies with clopidogrel, the time between onset of symptoms and primary PCI was proven as an important prognostic factor. Our aim was to assess the effect of symptoms onset to needle time (SNT) on procedural results and on the occurrence of ischemic endpoints in primary angioplasty patients treated with potent P2Y12 inhibitors. Methods: A total of 1,131 out of 1,230 patients randomized to the PRAGUE 18 study (prasugrel vs. ticagrelor in primary angioplasty) were divided into a high and a low-risk group. The effect of defined SNT on patients' ischemic endpoints and prognosis by their risk status at admission was tested.Results: The median SNT was 3.2 hours. Longer SNTs resulted in a more frequent incidence of TIMI flow < 3 post PCI (p = 0.015). There were significant differences in the occurrence of the combined ischemic endpoint among the compared SNT groups at 30 days (p=0.032), and 1 year (p=0.011), with the highest incidence in the ≤ 1 h SNT group of patients. "Latecomers" (SNT > 4 hs) in the high-risk group experienced more reMI within 1 year [OR (95% CI) 3.23 (1.09–9.62) p = 0.035]; no difference was found in the low-risk group. Conclusion: In the era of intense antithrombotic medication, stratification of STEMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty, based on initial ischemic risk assessment affected prognosis more than symptom onset to needle time. Longer time delay significantly increased the incidence of ischemic events and all-cause mortality only in patients with high ischemic risk.