Effects of field storage method on E. coli concentrations measured in storm water runoff

Author(s):  
Daren Harmel ◽  
Kevin Wagner ◽  
Emily Martin ◽  
Doug Smith ◽  
Pauline Wanjugi ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (21) ◽  
pp. 6357-6366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachery R. Staley ◽  
Josey Grabuski ◽  
Ed Sverko ◽  
Thomas A. Edge

ABSTRACTStorm water runoff is a major source of pollution, and understanding the components of storm water discharge is essential to remediation efforts and proper assessment of risks to human and ecosystem health. In this study, culturableEscherichia coliand ampicillin-resistantE. colilevels were quantified and microbial source tracking (MST) markers (including markers for generalBacteroidalesspp., human, ruminant/cow, gull, and dog) were detected in storm water outfalls and sites along the Humber River in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and enumerated via endpoint PCR and quantitative PCR (qPCR). Additionally, chemical source tracking (CST) markers specific for human wastewater (caffeine, carbamazepine, codeine, cotinine, acetaminophen, and acesulfame) were quantified. Human and gull fecal sources were detected at all sites, although concentrations of the human fecal marker were higher, particularly in outfalls (mean outfall concentrations of 4.22 log10copies, expressed as copy numbers [CN]/100 milliliters for human and 0.46 log10CN/100 milliliters for gull). Higher concentrations of caffeine, acetaminophen, acesulfame,E. coli, and the human fecal marker were indicative of greater raw sewage contamination at several sites (maximum concentrations of 34,800 ng/liter, 5,120 ng/liter, 9,720 ng/liter, 5.26 log10CFU/100 ml, and 7.65 log10CN/100 ml, respectively). These results indicate pervasive sewage contamination at storm water outfalls and throughout the Humber River, with multiple lines of evidence identifying Black Creek and two storm water outfalls with prominent sewage cross-connection problems requiring remediation. Limited data are available on specific sources of pollution in storm water, though our results indicate the value of using both MST and CST methodologies to more reliably assess sewage contamination in impacted watersheds.IMPORTANCEStorm water runoff is one of the most prominent non-point sources of biological and chemical contaminants which can potentially degrade water quality and pose risks to human and ecosystem health. Therefore, identifying fecal contamination in storm water runoff and outfalls is essential for remediation efforts to reduce risks to public health. This study employed multiple methods of identifying levels and sources of fecal contamination in both river and storm water outfall sites, evaluating the efficacy of using culture-based enumeration ofE. coli, molecular methods of determining the source(s) of contamination, and CST markers as indicators of fecal contamination. The results identified pervasive human sewage contamination in storm water outfalls and throughout an urban watershed and highlight the utility of using both MST and CST to identify raw sewage contamination.


2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory T. Kleinheinz ◽  
Colleen M. McDermott ◽  
Sarah Hughes ◽  
Amanda Brown

Rainfall and its associated storm water runoff have been associated with transport of many pollutants into beach water. Fecal material, from a variety of animals (humans, pets, livestock, and wildlife), can wash into beach water following rainfall and result in microbial contamination of the beach. Many locales around the world issue pre-emptive beach closures associated with rainfall. This study looked at eight beaches located in Door County, Wisconsin, on Lake Michigan to determine the impact of rainfall onE. coliconcentrations in beach water. Water samples were collected from beach water and storm water discharge pipes during rainfall events of 5 mm in the previous 24 hours. Six of the eight beaches showed a significant association between rainfall and elevated beach waterE. coliconcentrations. The duration of the impact of rainfall on beach waterE. coliconcentrations was variable (immediate to 12 hours). Amount of rainfall in the days previous to the sampling did not have significant impact on theE. coliconcentrations measured in beach water. Presence of storm water conveyance pipes adjacent to the beach did not have a uniform impact on beach waterE. coliconcentrations. This study suggests that each beach needs to be examined on its own with regard to rain impacts onE coliconcentrations in beach water.


1990 ◽  
Vol 22 (10-11) ◽  
pp. 69-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Durchschlag

As a result of urbanization, the pollutant discharges from sources such as treatment plant effluents and polluted stormwaters are responsible for an unacceptable water quality in the receiving waters.In particular, combined sewer system overflows may produce great damage due to a shock effect. To reduce these combined sewer overflow discharges, the most frequently used method is to build stormwater storage tanks. During storm water runoff, the hydraulic load of waste water treatment plants increases with additional retention storage. This might decrease the treatment efficiency and thereby decrease the benefit of stormwater storage tanks. The dynamic dependence between transport, storage and treatment is usually not taken into account. This dependence must be accounted for when planning treatment plants and calculating storage capacities in order to minimize the total pollution load to the receiving waters. A numerical model will be described that enables the BOD discharges to be continuously calculated. The pollutant transport process within the networks and the purification process within the treatment plants are simulated. The results of the simulation illustrate; a statistical balance of the efficiency of stormwater tanks with the treatment plant capacity and to optimize the volume of storm water tanks and the operation of combined sewer systems and treatment plants.


2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ljubisa Kalaba ◽  
Bruce G. Wilson ◽  
Katy Haralampides

2012 ◽  
Vol 138 (7) ◽  
pp. 734-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Nason ◽  
Don J. Bloomquist ◽  
Matthew S. Sprick

2003 ◽  
Vol 129 (5) ◽  
pp. 409-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hale W. Thurston ◽  
Haynes C. Goddard ◽  
David Szlag ◽  
Beth Lemberg

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 39-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidetoshi Kumata ◽  
Kouji Masuda ◽  
Junya Yamada ◽  
Hideshige Takada

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document